
La herramienta retro que piensa junto con su equipo
Best for: Developer-leaning agile teams and startups that want AI-assisted retros wired into Jira, GitHub and GitLab, an official MCP server their AI clients can drive, and flat pricing that doesn't grow with headcount — and that don't need anonymous input, card grouping, recurring retros or a procurement-grade security story.
LetRetro se presenta como «retrospectivas basadas en inteligencia artificial para equipos de ingeniería», dirigidas al ingeniero, no al Scrum Master. La página de inicio comienza con una queja en lugar de una lista de características:
«Las mejores conclusiones de la retrospectiva de su equipo, olvidadas para el martes. En cada sprint: excelentes comentarios, cero seguimiento».
La solución que ofrece es un proceso que va de la retrospectiva a la resolución: la IA agrupa las tarjetas, redacta las acciones y las abre en Jira o GitHub antes de que finalice la reunión. El precio es el segundo pilar: una tarifa plana de 15 dólares al mes por 200 puestos compartidos, que se presenta como «aproximadamente 0,08 dólares por desarrollador al mes» frente a los competidores que cobran por puesto. MCP, Canvas y Voice Mode apuestan por la rapidez de lanzamiento, y el historial de cambios lo respalda.
LetRetro ships faster than almost anything else in this category. Between June and September 2026 it landed AI board summaries, an official MCP server, GitLab linking, Canvas boards, workspace-enforced 2FA, Voice Mode and CSV/Google Sheets board export. The AI is the real product: board docs at three depth settings, and Pro trend analyses that track themes, blockers and burnout signals across retros.
The retro mechanics have started to catch up. A new Facilitation mode, on every plan but off by default, runs host-led phases: private reflection until the host reveals, then discussion, a vote-budget round with hidden totals, and actions, all on a shared countdown. Anonymity is still marketing only, since revealed cards show their authors, and there's no card grouping, no recurring retros and no in-app action list. And behind it sit four people, no SOC 2, and SAML only as a line on the Enterprise tier.
Best for a small engineering team that lives in Jira and wants its AI tooling to read the board. Not for a team that needs anonymity, or a procurement sign-off.