Spreo
5.9Pizarra colaborativa y lúdica para equipos ágiles
Spreo (formerly Metro Retro, then Ludi — renamed Spreo on 1 July 2026 after a US trademark cease-and-desist) is a visual agile collaboration whiteboard with 150+ templates spanning retros, planning poker, icebreakers and futurespectives. Its illustrated canvas and board gadgets — a shared Jukebox music player, timers, spinners, buzzers, confetti, throwable hats — make ceremonies feel engaging. Since late October 2026 it is priced by role: $13 a month for each Editor who runs sessions, $3 for regular team members and nothing for visitors on open boards, with Jira, Linear, SSO, PDF export and a beta MCP server all on the one Team plan. In-product AI still stops at beta sticky-note clustering.
Full review →
Neatro
5.5Retrospectivas estructuradas basadas en la seguridad psicológica
Neatro lleva a cabo retrospectivas mediante un marco guiado de cuatro pasos que incluye la opción de mantener el anonimato en cada comentario, sugerencias de agrupación basadas en IA, una encuesta ROTI automática y evaluaciones de estado «Team Radar» dirigidas a equipos ágiles distribuidos.
Full review →Summary
Spreo scores 5.9 overall and is best for agile teams who want retros, planning and workshops to feel visual and fun on a Jira or Linear backlog, with a few paid facilitators and everyone else on cheap Collaborator seats or free visitor links — and who would get real value from driving boards with an AI assistant over MCP. It offers paid plans from $13/Editor/mo billed annually ($16 monthly); Collaborators $3/user/mo ($4), visitors free.
Neatro scores 5.5 overall and is best for los Scrum Masters que deseen un proceso de facilitación guiado, en el que prime la seguridad, y que incorpore un seguimiento del bienestar del equipo. It offers a free tier.
Spreo es líder en factor de diversión y plataforma abierta. Neatro es líder en facilidad de uso, kit de herramientas retro, valor y integraciones.
En nuestras ocho dimensiones de evaluación, Spreo se sitúa a la cabeza con una puntuación global de 5.9. No obstante, la elección más adecuada dependerá de su equipo; consulte a continuación el desglose por dimensiones.
Scores compared
| Detail | Spreo | Neatro |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Retrospectives | Retrospectives |
| Team size | Small | Mid-market |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Free limit | No free plan for teams — 15-day Team trial. Spreo Lite (one board stored in your browser, up to 3 people, no sign-in) is a free taster, not a team plan | Free forever for 1 team of up to 10 members (no guest links): unlimited retrospectives and Team Radars, all 30+ ready-to-use templates, 1 custom template, 40 of the 400+ Question Game icebreaker questions, basic facilitation tools, 30-day data history — no exports, integrations or AI grouping |
| Starting price | $13/Editor/mo billed annually ($16 monthly); Collaborators $3/user/mo ($4), visitors free | $23.20/team/mo billed annually ($29/team/mo billed monthly), USD |
| Est. 3 teams × 8 people | $102/mo billed annually (Team plan — 3 Editors x $13 + 21 Collaborators x $3); $132/mo billed monthly | $69.60/mo billed annually (3 teams x Premium at $23.20; members per team are unlimited) — $87/mo if billed monthly |
| Enterprise | Yes | Yes |
| Founded | 2019 | 2020 |
| HQ | UK | Quebec, Canada |
| Data residency | European Union | Canada |
| Languages | English only | 2 (English, French) |
| Export formats | PDF · CSV · HTML · Markdown · JSON · Jira | PDF · CSV · Jira |
| Features | 46 | 33 |
| Integrations | 2 | 5 |
Feature & integration comparison
Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.
| Capability | Spreo | Neatro |
|---|---|---|
| Features | ||
| Custom templates | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anonymous input | ✓note | ✓ |
| Health Checks | — | ✓ |
| Action tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Async mode | — | ✓note |
| Whiteboard | ✓ | — |
| Independent voting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Polling | ✓note | — |
| Icebreaker games | ✓note | — |
| Agile Estimations | ✓ | — |
| Team Kudos | ✓note | — |
| AI grouping/clustering | ✓note | ✓note |
| AI action items | — | — |
| AI Summaries | — | — |
| Team Insights | — | — |
| In-meeting AI assistant | — | — |
| Action dashboard | ✓note | ✓ |
| Integrations | ||
| Asana | — | ✓note |
| Azure DevOps | — | ✓note |
| Basecamp | — | — |
| ClickUp | — | — |
| Confluence | — | — |
| GitHub | — | ✓note |
| GitLab | — | — |
| Jira | ✓note | ✓note |
| Linear | ✓note | — |
| Microsoft Teams | — | — |
| Monday.com | — | ✓note |
| Notion | — | — |
| Shortcut | — | — |
| Slack | — | — |
| Trello | — | — |
| Security & Privacy | ||
| SOC 2 | — | — |
| GDPR | ✓ | — |
| SSO / SAML | ✓note | ✓note |
| SCIM provisioning | — | — |
| ISO 27001 | — | — |
| On-premises | ✓note | — |
| Public API | ✓note | — |
| Webhooks | — | — |
| MCP server | ✓note | — |
Spreo — pros
- + Genuinely delightful, illustrated UI with a gadget shelf built for live sessions: a shared Jukebox, timers, spinners, buzzers and a Voter panel, plus confetti and throwable hats
- + Broad template library (150+) covering retros, icebreakers, planning poker, futurespectives, planning and estimation
- + Hide Identities and Private Writing make writing <em>and</em> voting anonymous, with fully configurable voting rounds
- + Actions carry owners and due dates, with daily and weekly reminder emails on by default and a cross-board Action Items dashboard
- + Role-based Team plan keeps big teams cheap ($3 Collaborators, free visitors on open boards) and includes two-way Jira, Linear cards, SSO, PDF export and the beta MCP server
Spreo — cons
- − No async retro mode, no recurring or scheduled retros, and no health-check product; mood and radar work happen on whiteboard templates only
- − Integrations stop at Jira and Linear — no Slack, Teams, Confluence or GitHub; Azure DevOps is on the pricing page but was still <em>"coming soon"</em> in the October 2026 release notes
- − In-product AI limited to beta sticky-note clustering — no summaries, action-item extraction, sentiment or coaching; MCP moves the AI into your own assistant rather than the board
- − Every facilitator needs a $13/month Editor seat, and the free Lite board holds three people and lives in one browser
- − Desktop and laptop only, and no SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own: the certifications on its security page are DigitalOcean's
Neatro — pros
- + Marco guiado de cuatro pasos con la posibilidad de realizar comentarios anónimos y un temporizador en cada paso
- + Team Radar es una verdadera evaluación periódica del estado del sistema con hasta 10 dimensiones personalizadas, no una plantilla adaptada a otros fines.
- + Las sugerencias de agrupación generadas por IA en el paso 2, que el moderador acepta o rechaza una por una: son de carácter auxiliar, no automático.
- + El tablero Kanban de acciones, una encuesta automática sobre el ROTI y un recordatorio sobre las acciones pendientes de la última retrospectiva permiten que el seguimiento sea visible
- + Precio económico por persona: <strong>23,20 $ al mes por equipo, con un número ilimitado de miembros</strong>, y el plan gratuito permite tener 10 miembros de forma indefinida
Neatro — cons
- − No hay integración nativa con Slack ni con Microsoft Teams: los recordatorios y los resúmenes aparecen dondequiera que pegue el enlace
- − La IA se limita a ofrecer sugerencias de agrupación; no incluye resúmenes, análisis de opiniones ni medidas a tomar extraídas por la IA
- − El plan gratuito no incluye <em>exportaciones, integraciones, enlaces para invitados ni agrupación mediante IA</em>; todas estas funciones están disponibles a partir del plan Premium
- − La tarificación por equipo resulta poco práctica cuando se supera un número reducido de equipos; los descuentos por volumen solo se aplican a partir de 20 equipos o más.
- − No cuenta con certificaciones SOC 2 ni ISO 27001 propias (en la sección de preguntas frecuentes sobre seguridad se hace referencia a las de Azure), el alojamiento se limita a Quebec y no dispone de SCIM, registros de auditoría, API pública ni resúmenes entre equipos.
Keep comparing
Other Spreo comparisons
Other Neatro comparisons
Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.