Retrospective Tools

Echometer vs Spreo

Una comparación detallada de puntuaciones, precios, funciones e integraciones para ayudarle a elegir la herramienta de retrospectiva más adecuada.

Echometer logo

Echometer

5.6

Retrospectivas basadas en la psicología y evaluaciones del bienestar del equipo para equipos de ingeniería

Echometer es una plataforma alemana dedicada a las retrospectivas, las evaluaciones de estado y las reuniones individuales, basada en encuestas periódicas, retrospectivas estructuradas y el seguimiento longitudinal del desarrollo de los equipos. Se dirige a jefes de equipo con una agenda apretada —directores de ingeniería, Scrum Masters y coaches ágiles— que prefieren contar con bibliotecas de preguntas basadas en estudios de investigación en lugar de una pizarra en blanco.

Full review →
Spreo logo

Spreo

5.9

Pizarra colaborativa y lúdica para equipos ágiles

Spreo (formerly Metro Retro, then Ludi — renamed Spreo on 1 July 2026 after a US trademark cease-and-desist) is a visual agile collaboration whiteboard with 150+ templates spanning retros, planning poker, icebreakers and futurespectives. Its illustrated canvas and board gadgets — a shared Jukebox music player, timers, spinners, buzzers, confetti, throwable hats — make ceremonies feel engaging. Since late October 2026 it is priced by role: $13 a month for each Editor who runs sessions, $3 for regular team members and nothing for visitors on open boards, with Jira, Linear, SSO, PDF export and a beta MCP server all on the one Team plan. In-product AI still stops at beta sticky-note clustering.

Full review →

Summary

Echometer scores 5.6 overall and is best for directores de ingeniería y coaches ágiles que deseen realizar evaluaciones periódicas vinculadas a las reuniones retrospectivas, con residencia de datos en la UE y una biblioteca de preguntas de carácter investigativo. It offers a free tier.

Spreo scores 5.9 overall and is best for agile teams who want retros, planning and workshops to feel visual and fun on a Jira or Linear backlog, with a few paid facilitators and everyone else on cheap Collaborator seats or free visitor links — and who would get real value from driving boards with an AI assistant over MCP. It offers paid plans from $13/Editor/mo billed annually ($16 monthly); Collaborators $3/user/mo ($4), visitors free.

Echometer es líder en kit de herramientas retro, valor, IA y análisis de datos y de nivel empresarial. Spreo es líder en facilidad de uso, factor de diversión y plataforma abierta.

En nuestras ocho dimensiones de evaluación, Spreo se sitúa a la cabeza con una puntuación global de 5.9. No obstante, la elección más adecuada dependerá de su equipo; consulte a continuación el desglose por dimensiones.

Scores compared

Echometer
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit8.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor5.5
AI & Insights4.0
Integrations4.0
Open Platform3.0
Enterprise-grade5.0
Spreo
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit6.5
Value7.5
Fun Factor8.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations4.0
Open Platform6.0
Enterprise-grade4.5
DetailEchometerSpreo
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketSmall
Free tierYesNo
Free limitStarter: 1 team, 25 workspace members, unlimited retro guests, 1 retro/month after trial, 2-retro archive per teamNo free plan for teams — 15-day Team trial. Spreo Lite (one board stored in your browser, up to 3 people, no sign-in) is a free taster, not a team plan
Starting price€29/team/mo$13/Editor/mo billed annually ($16 monthly); Collaborators $3/user/mo ($4), visitors free
Est. 3 teams × 8 people€87/mo billed annually, excl. VAT (3 teams × €29 Pro); €105/mo billed monthly$102/mo billed annually (Team plan — 3 Editors x $13 + 21 Collaborators x $3); $132/mo billed monthly
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20192019
HQMünster, GermanyUK
Data residencyGermanyEuropean Union
Languages2 (English, German)English only
Export formatsCSV · PDF · Markdown · EmailPDF · CSV · HTML · Markdown · JSON · Jira
Features4946
Integrations32

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityEchometerSpreo
Features
Custom templates✓✓
Anonymous input✓✓note
Health Checks✓—
Action tracking✓✓
Async mode✓—
Whiteboard✓✓
Independent voting✓✓
Polling✓✓note
Icebreaker games✓note✓note
Agile Estimations—✓
Team Kudos—✓note
AI grouping/clustering—✓note
AI action items✓note—
AI Summaries——
Team Insights——
In-meeting AI assistant——
Action dashboard✓✓note
Integrations
Asana——
Azure DevOps——
Basecamp——
ClickUp——
Confluence——
GitHub——
GitLab——
Jira✓✓note
Linear—✓note
Microsoft Teams✓note—
Monday.com——
Notion——
Shortcut——
Slack✓note—
Trello——
Security & Privacy
SOC 2——
GDPR✓✓
SSO / SAML✓note✓note
SCIM provisioning——
ISO 27001——
On-premises—✓note
Public API—✓note
Webhooks✓note—
MCP server—✓note

Echometer — pros

  • + Más de 200 preguntas de evaluación del bienestar basadas en estudios de investigación, modelos personalizados y encuestas periódicas programadas automáticamente
  • + Radares longitudinales de equipo, mapas de calor y un panel de control del espacio de trabajo interdepartamental vinculado a las reuniones retrospectivas
  • + Alojamiento exclusivamente en Alemania (Open Telekom Cloud, Magdeburgo/Biere) con un acuerdo de tratamiento de datos conforme al RGPD
  • + Open actions resurface automatically in the next retro, with opt-in email reminders and one-click push to Jira
  • + Tarifas por equipo, no por usuario: 87 € al mes para tres equipos de ocho personas, con facturación anual

Echometer — cons

  • − Aparte de Jira, Slack y Teams solo reciben notificaciones de «inicio de la retrospectiva» y «encuesta enviada»; no se envían resúmenes, ni se utiliza Confluence ni Linear.
  • − No dispone de API pública; los webhooks se activan únicamente ante dos eventos, y la exportación se realiza en formato PDF, CSV, Markdown o mediante un resumen enviado por correo electrónico.
  • − No se dispone de la certificación SOC 2: el certificado ISO 27001 abarca el centro de datos, pero no a Echometer en sí.
  • − Retro-side AI is limited to suggested measures and a prep-chat assistant. No clustering, no AI session summary
  • − No hay reuniones retrospectivas programadas: los recordatorios de periodicidad avisan al administrador del equipo, pero cada sesión se inicia manualmente.

Spreo — pros

  • + Genuinely delightful, illustrated UI with a gadget shelf built for live sessions: a shared Jukebox, timers, spinners, buzzers and a Voter panel, plus confetti and throwable hats
  • + Broad template library (150+) covering retros, icebreakers, planning poker, futurespectives, planning and estimation
  • + Hide Identities and Private Writing make writing <em>and</em> voting anonymous, with fully configurable voting rounds
  • + Actions carry owners and due dates, with daily and weekly reminder emails on by default and a cross-board Action Items dashboard
  • + Role-based Team plan keeps big teams cheap ($3 Collaborators, free visitors on open boards) and includes two-way Jira, Linear cards, SSO, PDF export and the beta MCP server

Spreo — cons

  • − No async retro mode, no recurring or scheduled retros, and no health-check product; mood and radar work happen on whiteboard templates only
  • − Integrations stop at Jira and Linear — no Slack, Teams, Confluence or GitHub; Azure DevOps is on the pricing page but was still <em>"coming soon"</em> in the October 2026 release notes
  • − In-product AI limited to beta sticky-note clustering — no summaries, action-item extraction, sentiment or coaching; MCP moves the AI into your own assistant rather than the board
  • − Every facilitator needs a $13/month Editor seat, and the free Lite board holds three people and lives in one browser
  • − Desktop and laptop only, and no SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own: the certifications on its security page are DigitalOcean's

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.