Spreo
5.9Interaktywna tablica do współpracy dla zespołów stosujących metodologię agile
Spreo (formerly Metro Retro, then Ludi — renamed Spreo on 1 July 2026 after a US trademark cease-and-desist) is a visual agile collaboration whiteboard with 150+ templates spanning retros, planning poker, icebreakers and futurespectives. Its illustrated canvas and board gadgets — a shared Jukebox music player, timers, spinners, buzzers, confetti, throwable hats — make ceremonies feel engaging. Since late October 2026 it is priced by role: $13 a month for each Editor who runs sessions, $3 for regular team members and nothing for visitors on open boards, with Jira, Linear, SSO, PDF export and a beta MCP server all on the one Team plan. In-product AI still stops at beta sticky-note clustering.
Full review →
RetroTeam
4.6AI-first retro tool, now shut down: its website and app are offline
RetroTeam was a focused, AI-first retrospective app — capture, group, vote, act, with Jira hand-off. Its vendor announced a wind-down and moved to ChannelPulse, an unrelated interview-coaching product, and by 5 November 2026 both the website and the app were offline.
Full review →Summary
Spreo scores 5.9 overall and is best for agile teams who want retros, planning and workshops to feel visual and fun on a Jira or Linear backlog, with a few paid facilitators and everyone else on cheap Collaborator seats or free visitor links — and who would get real value from driving boards with an AI assistant over MCP. It offers paid plans from $13/Editor/mo billed annually ($16 monthly); Collaborators $3/user/mo ($4), visitors free.
RetroTeam scores 4.6 overall and is best for nobody: the app is offline. Former users need a replacement, and there is no published way to recover old boards or reports. It is no longer available.
Spreo zajmuje czołową pozycję w kategorii zestaw narzędzi w stylu retro, czynnik zabawy, integracje, otwarta platforma oraz klasy korporacyjnej. RetroTeam zajmuje czołową pozycję w kategorii wartość oraz Sztuczna inteligencja i analizy.
W ośmiu ocenianych przez nas kategoriach Spreo zajmuje czołową pozycję, uzyskując ogólny wynik 5.9. Niemniej jednak właściwy wybór zależy od Państwa zespołu — poniżej przedstawiamy szczegółową analizę poszczególnych kategorii.
Scores compared
| Detail | Spreo | RetroTeam |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Retrospectives | Retrospectives |
| Team size | Small | Small |
| Free tier | No | No |
| Free limit | No free plan for teams — 15-day Team trial. Spreo Lite (one board stored in your browser, up to 3 people, no sign-in) is a free taster, not a team plan | — |
| Starting price | $13/Editor/mo billed annually ($16 monthly); Collaborators $3/user/mo ($4), visitors free | N/A — shut down |
| Est. 3 teams × 8 people | $102/mo billed annually (Team plan — 3 Editors x $13 + 21 Collaborators x $3); $132/mo billed monthly | N/A — shut down |
| Enterprise | Yes | Yes |
| Founded | 2019 | 2022 |
| HQ | UK | Oakland, California, US |
| Data residency | European Union | United States |
| Languages | English only | English only |
| Export formats | PDF · CSV · HTML · Markdown · JSON · Jira | |
| Features | 46 | 22 |
| Integrations | 2 | 1 |
Feature & integration comparison
Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.
| Capability | Spreo | RetroTeam |
|---|---|---|
| Features | ||
| Custom templates | ✓ | ✓note |
| Anonymous input | ✓note | ✓ |
| Health Checks | — | — |
| Action tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Async mode | — | — |
| Whiteboard | ✓ | — |
| Independent voting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Polling | ✓note | — |
| Icebreaker games | ✓note | — |
| Agile Estimations | ✓ | — |
| Team Kudos | ✓note | — |
| AI grouping/clustering | ✓note | ✓ |
| AI action items | — | ✓ |
| AI Summaries | — | ✓ |
| Team Insights | — | ✓ |
| In-meeting AI assistant | — | — |
| Action dashboard | ✓note | ✓ |
| Integrations | ||
| Asana | — | — |
| Azure DevOps | — | — |
| Basecamp | — | — |
| ClickUp | — | — |
| Confluence | — | — |
| GitHub | — | — |
| GitLab | — | — |
| Jira | ✓note | ✓note |
| Linear | ✓note | — |
| Microsoft Teams | — | — |
| Monday.com | — | — |
| Notion | — | — |
| Shortcut | — | — |
| Slack | — | — |
| Trello | — | — |
| Security & Privacy | ||
| SOC 2 | — | — |
| GDPR | ✓ | ✓note |
| SSO / SAML | ✓note | — |
| SCIM provisioning | — | — |
| ISO 27001 | — | — |
| On-premises | ✓note | — |
| Public API | ✓note | — |
| Webhooks | — | — |
| MCP server | ✓note | — |
Spreo — pros
- + Genuinely delightful, illustrated UI with a gadget shelf built for live sessions: a shared Jukebox, timers, spinners, buzzers and a Voter panel, plus confetti and throwable hats
- + Broad template library (150+) covering retros, icebreakers, planning poker, futurespectives, planning and estimation
- + Hide Identities and Private Writing make writing <em>and</em> voting anonymous, with fully configurable voting rounds
- + Actions carry owners and due dates, with daily and weekly reminder emails on by default and a cross-board Action Items dashboard
- + Role-based Team plan keeps big teams cheap ($3 Collaborators, free visitors on open boards) and includes two-way Jira, Linear cards, SSO, PDF export and the beta MCP server
Spreo — cons
- − No async retro mode, no recurring or scheduled retros, and no health-check product; mood and radar work happen on whiteboard templates only
- − Integrations stop at Jira and Linear — no Slack, Teams, Confluence or GitHub; Azure DevOps is on the pricing page but was still <em>"coming soon"</em> in the October 2026 release notes
- − In-product AI limited to beta sticky-note clustering — no summaries, action-item extraction, sentiment or coaching; MCP moves the AI into your own assistant rather than the board
- − Every facilitator needs a $13/month Editor seat, and the free Lite board holds three people and lives in one browser
- − Desktop and laptop only, and no SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own: the certifications on its security page are DigitalOcean's
RetroTeam — pros
- + Zwięzły, zdecydowany przebieg w stylu retro — zebranie, podział na grupy za pomocą sztucznej inteligencji, głosowanie, podjęcie działania — z limitem czasowym na każdym etapie
- + Sugestie grupowania generowane przez sztuczną inteligencję można akceptować lub odrzucać dla poszczególnych kart; nie są one nakładane na całość
- + Stała opłata miesięczna: 30 USD miesięcznie obejmuje 5 zespołów i 50 użytkowników, co stanowi kwotę znacznie niższą niż w przypadku konkurencyjnych rozwiązań opartych na opłatach za stanowisko
- + Uczestnicy dołączają za pomocą linku – nie jest wymagane zakładanie konta
- + Panel działań obejmujący całą organizację, zawierający informacje o osobie odpowiedzialnej, statusie i terminie realizacji, a także jednokierunkowe linki do Jira
RetroTeam — cons
- − <strong>Shut down:</strong> the website and the app at main.retroteam.ai were both offline when checked on 5 November 2026; the team has moved to ChannelPulse, an unrelated interview-coaching product
- − No shutdown date, export window or migration guidance was ever published; the only export had been a PDF report, with no API, webhooks or MCP to pull history out another way
- − Jira jest jedyną dostępną integracją — nie ma integracji ze Slackiem, Teams, GitHubem, Linearem ani Azure DevOps
- − Brak kontroli stanu, cyklicznych podsumowań, planowania, trybu asynchronicznego ani wyrażania uznania
- − Brak obsługi SSO, SCIM, certyfikatu SOC 2 ani dzienników audytowych; hosting jest dostępny wyłącznie w Stanach Zjednoczonych, bez możliwości wyboru lokalizacji w UE
Keep comparing
Other Spreo comparisons
Other RetroTeam comparisons
Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.