Spreo
5.9Quadro branco colaborativo e interativo para equipes ágeis
Spreo (formerly Metro Retro, then Ludi — renamed Spreo on 1 July 2026 after a US trademark cease-and-desist) is a visual agile collaboration whiteboard with 150+ templates spanning retros, planning poker, icebreakers and futurespectives. Its illustrated canvas and board gadgets — a shared Jukebox music player, timers, spinners, buzzers, confetti, throwable hats — make ceremonies feel engaging. Since late October 2026 it is priced by role: $13 a month for each Editor who runs sessions, $3 for regular team members and nothing for visitors on open boards, with Jira, Linear, SSO, PDF export and a beta MCP server all on the one Team plan. In-product AI still stops at beta sticky-note clustering.
Full review →
ScatterSpoke
5.4AI interview surveys with free retro boards
O ScatterSpoke foi reconstruído do zero como versão 3 em agosto de 2026: painéis de retrospectiva guiados, pesquisas estáticas e pesquisas de entrevista conduzidas por IA, além do Ask, que responde a perguntas em retrospectivas fechadas e pesquisas com evidências citadas. Um servidor MCP oficial do OAuth está incluído em todos os planos, inclusive no plano Gratuito.
Full review →Summary
Spreo scores 5.9 overall and is best for agile teams who want retros, planning and workshops to feel visual and fun on a Jira or Linear backlog, with a few paid facilitators and everyone else on cheap Collaborator seats or free visitor links — and who would get real value from driving boards with an AI assistant over MCP. It offers paid plans from $13/Editor/mo billed annually ($16 monthly); Collaborators $3/user/mo ($4), visitors free.
ScatterSpoke scores 5.4 overall and is best for organizações de engenharia que desejam que a IA sintetize o feedback de várias equipes e pesquisas — e desenvolvedores de agentes que precisam de um back-end de pesquisa baseado no MCP. It offers a free tier.
Spreo lidera em facilidade de uso, valor, fator de diversão, integrações e plataforma aberta. ScatterSpoke lidera em kit de ferramentas retrô, IA e insights e de nível empresarial.
Em nossas oito dimensões de avaliação, Spreo se destaca com uma pontuação geral de 5.9. Dito isso, a escolha certa depende da sua equipe — confira a análise detalhada por dimensão abaixo.
Scores compared
| Detail | Spreo | ScatterSpoke |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Retrospectives | Retrospectives |
| Team size | Small | Mid-market |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Free limit | No free plan for teams — 15-day Team trial. Spreo Lite (one board stored in your browser, up to 3 people, no sign-in) is a free taster, not a team plan | 1 seat and 1 team; unlimited static surveys and responses; retro boards with manual grouping and voting but no AI; 10 Agent Surveys and 50 Ask queries one-time; MCP connection but no reading results over it |
| Starting price | $13/Editor/mo billed annually ($16 monthly); Collaborators $3/user/mo ($4), visitors free | $29/user/mo |
| Est. 3 teams × 8 people | $102/mo billed annually (Team plan — 3 Editors x $13 + 21 Collaborators x $3); $132/mo billed monthly | $149/mo on Business (monthly list price) — 3 teams exceed Pro's 2-team cap; the 5 included seats cover the facilitators, since participants and guests never take a seat |
| Enterprise | Yes | Yes |
| Founded | 2019 | 2019 |
| HQ | UK | USA |
| Data residency | European Union | — |
| Languages | English only | English only |
| Export formats | PDF · CSV · HTML · Markdown · JSON · Jira | CSV |
| Features | 46 | 39 |
| Integrations | 2 | 0 |
Feature & integration comparison
Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.
| Capability | Spreo | ScatterSpoke |
|---|---|---|
| Features | ||
| Custom templates | ✓ | ✓note |
| Anonymous input | ✓note | ✓ |
| Health Checks | — | ✓note |
| Action tracking | ✓ | — |
| Async mode | — | ✓ |
| Whiteboard | ✓ | — |
| Independent voting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Polling | ✓note | ✓note |
| Icebreaker games | ✓note | — |
| Agile Estimations | ✓ | — |
| Team Kudos | ✓note | — |
| AI grouping/clustering | ✓note | ✓note |
| AI action items | — | — |
| AI Summaries | — | ✓note |
| Team Insights | — | ✓ |
| In-meeting AI assistant | — | — |
| Action dashboard | ✓note | — |
| Integrations | ||
| Asana | — | — |
| Azure DevOps | — | — |
| Basecamp | — | — |
| ClickUp | — | — |
| Confluence | — | — |
| GitHub | — | — |
| GitLab | — | — |
| Jira | ✓note | — |
| Linear | ✓note | — |
| Microsoft Teams | — | — |
| Monday.com | — | — |
| Notion | — | — |
| Shortcut | — | — |
| Slack | — | — |
| Trello | — | — |
| Security & Privacy | ||
| SOC 2 | — | — |
| GDPR | ✓ | ✓ |
| SSO / SAML | ✓note | ✓note |
| SCIM provisioning | — | ✓note |
| ISO 27001 | — | — |
| On-premises | ✓note | — |
| Public API | ✓note | ✓note |
| Webhooks | — | — |
| MCP server | ✓note | ✓ |
Spreo — pros
- + Genuinely delightful, illustrated UI with a gadget shelf built for live sessions: a shared Jukebox, timers, spinners, buzzers and a Voter panel, plus confetti and throwable hats
- + Broad template library (150+) covering retros, icebreakers, planning poker, futurespectives, planning and estimation
- + Hide Identities and Private Writing make writing <em>and</em> voting anonymous, with fully configurable voting rounds
- + Actions carry owners and due dates, with daily and weekly reminder emails on by default and a cross-board Action Items dashboard
- + Role-based Team plan keeps big teams cheap ($3 Collaborators, free visitors on open boards) and includes two-way Jira, Linear cards, SSO, PDF export and the beta MCP server
Spreo — cons
- − No async retro mode, no recurring or scheduled retros, and no health-check product; mood and radar work happen on whiteboard templates only
- − Integrations stop at Jira and Linear — no Slack, Teams, Confluence or GitHub; Azure DevOps is on the pricing page but was still <em>"coming soon"</em> in the October 2026 release notes
- − In-product AI limited to beta sticky-note clustering — no summaries, action-item extraction, sentiment or coaching; MCP moves the AI into your own assistant rather than the board
- − Every facilitator needs a $13/month Editor seat, and the free Lite board holds three people and lives in one browser
- − Desktop and laptop only, and no SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own: the certifications on its security page are DigitalOcean's
ScatterSpoke — pros
- + Servidor oficial do MCP em todos os planos, incluindo o gratuito — login via OAuth, 33 ferramentas que abrangem pesquisas e quadros de retrospectiva; a versão paga se destaca na visualização dos resultados
- + Apenas os facilitadores precisam de vagas — os membros da equipe e os convidados com e-mail confirmado participam dos painéis gratuitamente; assim, cabem 3 equipes de 8 pessoas no plano básico do Business, de US$ 149/mês
- + A opção “Escrita privada até a revelação” e a “Votação cega” estão ativadas por padrão, e a função “Agrupar com IA” não altera os grupos criados manualmente
- + O Ask cita a pesquisa retrospectiva ou o levantamento por trás de suas respostas, e os resumos de pesquisas retrospectivas fechadas rastreiam quais temas se repetem ao longo das rodadas (planos pagos)
- + As pesquisas de entrevista conduzidas por IA dão continuidade a cada resposta — uma opção viável para avaliações de saúde assíncronas entre as retrospectivas
ScatterSpoke — cons
- − <strong>Sem itens de ação</strong> — o quadro da v3 não possui objeto de ação, portanto as decisões são registradas nos comentários dos cartões
- − No retro-loop integrations: nothing pushes to Jira, GitHub or Azure DevOps or posts to Slack or Teams; the Jira, GitHub and Linear connections behind Pro's "Integrations" line only pull metrics in, from a settings page hidden from the menu
- − Uma exportação em CSV de um retro encerrado; os registros de auditoria estão disponíveis apenas na versão Enterprise
- − O Retro AI é um serviço pago e o Ask é cobrado por uso — um pacote mensal compartilhado de 250 consultas no plano Pro e 2.000 no plano Business
- − A documentação descreve as páginas “Sinais” e “Automações”, que não estão incluídas no aplicativo web fornecido até outubro de 2026
Keep comparing
Other Spreo comparisons
Other ScatterSpoke comparisons
Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.