Retrospective Tools

Spreo vs TeamRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Spreo logo

Spreo

5.3

Playful collaborative whiteboard for agile teams

Spreo (formerly Metro Retro, then Ludi — renamed Spreo on 1 July 2026 for trademark reasons) is a visual agile collaboration whiteboard with 100+ templates spanning retros, planning poker, icebreakers and futurespectives. Its signature illustrated canvas and gadgets make ceremonies feel engaging, and a first AI feature — sticky-note clustering — shipped February 2026.

Full review →
TeamRetro logo

TeamRetro

8.2

Retrospectives, health checks and agile estimations in one suite

TeamRetro pairs structured retrospectives with longitudinal team health checks and planning-poker estimations, aimed at agile organisations running multiple teams under a coach or programme.

Full review →

Summary

Spreo scores 5.3 overall and is best for agile teams who want retros, planning and workshops to feel visual and fun, with a solid Jira-backed delivery loop. It offers paid plans from $4/user/mo.

TeamRetro scores 8.2 overall and is best for agile coaches and engineering managers running ongoing health-check programmes alongside sprint retros. It offers paid plans from $25/mo.

Spreo leads on fun factor. TeamRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, TeamRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.2. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Spreo
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit6.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor9.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations3.0
Open Platform2.0
Enterprise-grade3.5
TeamRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit9.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights8.0
Integrations9.0
Open Platform7.0
Enterprise-grade9.5
DetailSpreoTeamRetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallAny
Free tierNoNo
Free limit30-day free trial; boards become read-only when the trial expires30-day free trial, no credit card required
Starting price$4/user/mo$25/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$96/mo billed annually$50/mo billed annually (Small Organization plan — a 3-team bundle, cheaper than 3 × Single Team)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20202017
HQUKAustralia
Data residencyEuropean UnionUnited States · European Union
LanguagesEnglish only30 (English, Arabic, Bengali, …)
Export formatsPDF · CSV · HTML · Markdown · JSON · JiraExcel · CSV · PDF · Markdown · Email
Features3365
Integrations115

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilitySpreoTeamRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clusteringnote
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Pollingnote
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous inputnote
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudosnote
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001note
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooksnote
MCP servernote

Spreo — pros

  • + Genuinely delightful, illustrated UI that energises in-person and remote retros
  • + Broad template library (100+) covering retros, icebreakers, planning poker, futurespectives, planning and estimation
  • + Solid two-way Jira integration: backlog refinement, estimation and issue creation in-board
  • + Facilitator controls, private writing mode and shareable team spaces
  • + First AI feature shipped Feb 2026 — Sort into Topics auto-groups stickies into labelled topics
  • + EU-hosted (Amsterdam) and GDPR-aligned (SOC 2 / ISO 27001 sit at the Digital Ocean infrastructure layer, not Spreo)

Spreo — cons

  • No async retro mode, no recurring or scheduled retros
  • No team health check or longitudinal pulse product; mood/radar work via whiteboard templates only
  • Integrations limited to Jira — no Slack, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • AI limited to one clustering feature — no summaries, action-item extraction, sentiment or coaching
  • No ongoing free plan; expired trials become read-only
  • SSO gated to a paid/Enterprise plan; no SCIM or audit logs advertised

TeamRetro — pros

  • + Health checks with custom models, longitudinal tracking and cross-team reporting
  • + Three modules in one suite (retros, health checks, planning poker)
  • + Complete enterprise stack: SAML SSO, SCIM and audit logs, SOC 2 Type 2 held directly, US/EU data residency
  • + AI grouping, template suggestions, action items and sentiment built in
  • + Broad agile-tool integrations including Jira, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence

TeamRetro — cons

  • No free tier — 30-day trial only, then a paid plan is required
  • SCIM provisioning and the full account-level Read/Write API stay Enterprise-only
  • ISO 27001 is inherited via AWS, not held directly
  • Data residency limited to US and EU (no APAC region)

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.