Retrospective Tools

FigJam vs Spreo

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

FigJam logo

FigJam

7.3

Figma's whiteboard with AI sticky clustering, an official MCP server that reaches FigJam boards, and a $3 Collab seat — free tier caps at 3 boards

FigJam is the whiteboard product inside Figma — sticky notes, timer, music, stamps and emotes, voting sessions, one-click AI that sorts and summarises stickies, and 300+ ready-made templates including community retro boards. Design and product teams already living in Figma get retros without buying a second tool, backed by Figma's SAML/SCIM, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and Enterprise data residency in the EU, Australia, India, Brazil and Japan. Figma's official MCP server reads FigJam boards on every plan; letting an agent write to them is a beta that needs a Full seat. Voting sessions, open guest sessions, audio chat and webhooks all require a paid team; publishing custom templates requires Organization.

Full review →
Spreo logo

Spreo

5.9

Playful collaborative whiteboard for agile teams

Spreo (formerly Metro Retro, then Ludi — renamed Spreo on 1 July 2026 after a US trademark cease-and-desist) is a visual agile collaboration whiteboard with 150+ templates spanning retros, planning poker, icebreakers and futurespectives. Its illustrated canvas and board gadgets — a shared Jukebox music player, timers, spinners, buzzers, confetti, throwable hats — make ceremonies feel engaging. Since late October 2026 it is priced by role: $13 a month for each Editor who runs sessions, $3 for regular team members and nothing for visitors on open boards, with Jira, Linear, SSO, PDF export and a beta MCP server all on the one Team plan. In-product AI still stops at beta sticky-note clustering.

Full review →

Summary

FigJam scores 7.3 overall and is best for design and product teams already on Figma who want retros on the same platform as their design files, with playful engagement, AI sticky clustering and an agent-accessible canvas. It offers a free tier.

Spreo scores 5.9 overall and is best for agile teams who want retros, planning and workshops to feel visual and fun on a Jira or Linear backlog, with a few paid facilitators and everyone else on cheap Collaborator seats or free visitor links — and who would get real value from driving boards with an AI assistant over MCP. It offers paid plans from $13/Editor/mo billed annually ($16 monthly); Collaborators $3/user/mo ($4), visitors free.

FigJam leads on value, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade. Spreo leads on ease of use and retro toolkit.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, FigJam edges ahead with an overall score of 7.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

FigJam
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit4.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor8.0
AI & Insights5.0
Integrations7.0
Open Platform9.5
Enterprise-grade9.0
Spreo
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit6.5
Value7.5
Fun Factor8.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations4.0
Open Platform6.0
Enterprise-grade4.5
DetailFigJamSpreo
CategoryWhiteboardRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketSmall
Free tierYesNo
Free limitStarter: 3 FigJam files per team (unlimited personal drafts), 150 AI credits/day up to 500/month, 300+ templates, timer, music, AI Sort/Summarize/Generate, REST API and 20 MCP tool calls/month, 30-day version history — no voting sessions, audio chat, open (no-account) sessions or webhooksNo free plan for teams — 15-day Team trial. Spreo Lite (one board stored in your browser, up to 3 people, no sign-in) is a free taster, not a team plan
Starting price$3/user/mo (Collab seat, billed annually; $5 billed monthly)$13/Editor/mo billed annually ($16 monthly); Collaborators $3/user/mo ($4), visitors free
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$72/mo (24 Collab seats × $3, billed annually; $120/mo billed monthly at $5)$102/mo billed annually (Team plan — 3 Editors x $13 + 21 Collaborators x $3); $132/mo billed monthly
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20122019
HQSan Francisco, USUK
Data residencyUnited States · European Union · Australia · IN · BR · JPEuropean Union
Languages7 (English, Japanese, Korean, …)English only
Export formatsPDF · Image · CSVPDF · CSV · HTML · Markdown · JSON · Jira
Features4246
Integrations102

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityFigJamSpreo
Features
Custom templates✓note✓
Anonymous input—✓note
Health Checks——
Action tracking—✓
Async mode✓—
Whiteboard✓✓
Independent voting✓note✓
Polling✓✓note
Icebreaker games✓note✓note
Agile Estimations✓note✓
Team Kudos—✓note
AI grouping/clustering✓✓note
AI action items✓note—
AI Summaries✓—
Team Insights——
In-meeting AI assistant✓note—
Action dashboard—✓note
Integrations
Asana✓note—
Azure DevOps——
Basecamp——
ClickUp——
Confluence✓note—
GitHub✓note—
GitLab——
Jira✓note✓note
Linear✓note✓note
Microsoft Teams✓note—
Monday.com✓note—
Notion✓note—
Shortcut——
Slack✓note—
Trello✓note—
Security & Privacy
SOC 2✓—
GDPR✓✓
SSO / SAML✓note✓note
SCIM provisioning✓note—
ISO 27001✓—
On-premises—✓note
Public API✓✓note
Webhooks✓—
MCP server✓✓note

FigJam — pros

  • + Cheap $3/user/mo Collab seat (billed annually; $5 monthly) unlocks unlimited boards and full FigJam editing without a Full Figma seat
  • + Free Starter tier includes real AI credits (150/day, 500/month), 300+ templates, the timer, music and AI Sort/Summarize
  • + Playful, engaging UX — stamps, emotes, high-fives, music, cursor chat — lifts retro fun factor
  • + Best open platform of any whiteboard here: REST API on every plan, webhooks on paid, and an <strong>official MCP server that reads FigJam boards</strong> on every plan
  • + Strong enterprise posture inherited from Figma: SAML, SCIM, activity logs, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and Enterprise data residency in the EU, Australia, India, Brazil and Japan

FigJam — cons

  • − No native action-item tracking, recurring retros or health checks
  • − Anonymity is weak — votes reveal who voted once the session ends, and live cursors show who is writing even when a sticky's name tag is switched off
  • − Action items leave the board only by hand: the Jira, GitHub and Asana widgets turn selected stickies into tickets, but Confluence, Linear and Notion are embeds only and there is no Azure DevOps
  • − Free Starter caps a team at 3 FigJam files and excludes voting, audio chat, no-account guest links and webhooks; publishing custom templates needs Organization
  • − Built primarily for designers — the canvas paradigm is fiddly for structured retros, and large boards get sluggish

Spreo — pros

  • + Genuinely delightful, illustrated UI with a gadget shelf built for live sessions: a shared Jukebox, timers, spinners, buzzers and a Voter panel, plus confetti and throwable hats
  • + Broad template library (150+) covering retros, icebreakers, planning poker, futurespectives, planning and estimation
  • + Hide Identities and Private Writing make writing <em>and</em> voting anonymous, with fully configurable voting rounds
  • + Actions carry owners and due dates, with daily and weekly reminder emails on by default and a cross-board Action Items dashboard
  • + Role-based Team plan keeps big teams cheap ($3 Collaborators, free visitors on open boards) and includes two-way Jira, Linear cards, SSO, PDF export and the beta MCP server

Spreo — cons

  • − No async retro mode, no recurring or scheduled retros, and no health-check product; mood and radar work happen on whiteboard templates only
  • − Integrations stop at Jira and Linear — no Slack, Teams, Confluence or GitHub; Azure DevOps is on the pricing page but was still <em>"coming soon"</em> in the October 2026 release notes
  • − In-product AI limited to beta sticky-note clustering — no summaries, action-item extraction, sentiment or coaching; MCP moves the AI into your own assistant rather than the board
  • − Every facilitator needs a $13/month Editor seat, and the free Lite board holds three people and lives in one browser
  • − Desktop and laptop only, and no SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own: the certifications on its security page are DigitalOcean's

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.