Retrospective Tools

Spreo vs Parabol

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Spreo logo

Spreo

5.3

Playful collaborative whiteboard for agile teams

Spreo (formerly Metro Retro, then Ludi — renamed Spreo on 1 July 2026 after a US trademark cease-and-desist) is a visual agile collaboration whiteboard with 100+ templates spanning retros, planning poker, icebreakers and futurespectives. Its illustrated canvas and board gadgets — a shared Jukebox music player, timers, spinners, buzzers, confetti, throwable hats — make ceremonies feel engaging. Both the Jira integration and SSO require the $6/user Business plan, and AI stops at beta sticky-note clustering.

Full review →
Parabol logo

Parabol

7.4

Open-source agile meetings for retros, poker, standups and check-ins

Parabol is an open-source agile meeting platform spanning retrospectives, sprint poker, async standups, team check-ins and lightweight team health, with deep backlog sync to Jira, GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps and Linear, recurring meeting series, and a built-in knowledge base (Pages) that auto-publishes every meeting summary and runs AI queries across past retros.

Full review →

Summary

Spreo scores 5.3 overall and is best for agile teams who want retros, planning and workshops to feel visual and fun, with a solid Jira-backed delivery loop — budget for the Business plan, which is where Jira and SSO actually live. It offers paid plans from $4/user/mo billed annually ($5 monthly).

Parabol scores 7.4 overall and is best for distributed agile teams that want one open-source tool for retros, poker, standups and lightweight team health. It offers a free tier.

Spreo leads on value and fun factor. Parabol leads on retro toolkit, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Parabol edges ahead with an overall score of 7.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Spreo
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit6.5
Value7.0
Fun Factor9.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations3.0
Open Platform2.0
Enterprise-grade4.5
Parabol
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit9.0
Value5.0
Fun Factor7.0
AI & Insights8.0
Integrations9.0
Open Platform5.0
Enterprise-grade8.0
DetailSpreoParabol
CategoryRetrospectivesAll-in-One Agile
Team sizeSmallAny
Free tierNoYes
Free limit30-day free trial; boards become read-only when the trial expiresUnlimited users, 2 teams, 10 meetings/month, 30-day history, 2 custom templates, 3 AI retro summaries/month
Starting price$4/user/mo billed annually ($5 monthly)$8/active user/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$144/mo billed annually (Business — 24 x $6; Starter's $96/mo covers only one shared team space)$192/mo
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20202015
HQUKRemote (San Diego, CA)
Data residencyEuropean UnionUnited States · European Union · Self-hosted
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsPDF · CSV · HTML · Markdown · JSON · JiraCSV · Email
Features4046
Integrations17

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilitySpreoParabol
Features
AI Summariesnote
AI grouping/clusteringnotenote
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insightsnote
Pollingnotenote
Action dashboard
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous inputnote
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checksnote
Team Kudosnote
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001
On-premisesnotenote
Public API
Webhooksnote
MCP server

Spreo — pros

  • + Genuinely delightful, illustrated UI that energises in-person and remote retros
  • + Broad template library (100+) covering retros, icebreakers, planning poker, futurespectives, planning and estimation
  • + Deep gadget shelf that actually serves the session: shared Jukebox music player, timers, spinners, buzzers, confetti, throwable hats
  • + Fully configurable voting rounds — votes per person, duplicate votes, and voting on topics as well as individual stickies
  • + Solid two-way Jira integration: backlog refinement, story points and issue creation in-board
  • + @mentions and a notification centre across stickies, cards, text blocks and comments
  • + EU-hosted (Amsterdam) and GDPR-aligned (SOC 2 / ISO 27001 sit at the Digital Ocean infrastructure layer, not Spreo)

Spreo — cons

  • No async retro mode, no recurring or scheduled retros
  • No team health check or longitudinal pulse product; mood/radar work via whiteboard templates only
  • Integrations limited to Jira — no Slack, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • <strong>Jira and SSO both start at the $6/user Business plan</strong>, so the $4 Starter headline is misleading past a single team space
  • AI limited to beta sticky-note clustering — no summaries, action-item extraction, sentiment or coaching
  • No ongoing free plan; expired trials pause to read-only
  • Desktop and laptop only — the vendor states Spreo runs on <em>"all desktop and laptop devices"</em>, with no mobile or tablet support
  • Two renames in under a year leave the review trail split across three names — G2 files it under <em>Ludi</em>, Capterra and Product Hunt under <em>Metro Retro</em>

Parabol — pros

  • + Open source (AGPL-3.0) with Docker/Kubernetes self-host, on-prem and air-gapped deployment
  • + 40+ retro templates plus poker, standups, check-ins and team health in one tool
  • + Strong backlog write-back to Jira, GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps and Linear
  • + CSV export of reflections, groups, votes and discussion threads on <em>every</em> tier
  • + Recurring retro series with a real recurrence rule and Google Calendar sync
  • + DoD Iron Bank hardened container, cleared to IL4 via Platform One

Parabol — cons

  • Free tier capped at 10 meetings/month, 30-day history and 3 AI summaries
  • No native whiteboard, presentation mode or screen-share mode
  • Health-check is a single emoji poll — no custom radars or trend dashboards
  • AI grouping and team health checks need the paid Team tier; Pages Insights needs org-level enablement
  • Webhooks stop at Mattermost/MS Teams notification URLs — no general event subscriptions and no MCP server
  • No Confluence, Trello or multi-language support

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.