Retrospective Tools

FigJam vs Mural

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

FigJam logo

FigJam

7.2

Figma's whiteboard with AI sticky clustering, voting sessions and a $3 Collab seat — free tier caps at 3 boards

FigJam is the whiteboard product inside Figma — sticky notes, timer, music, expressive cursor stamps, voting sessions, an AI co-pilot that clusters and summarises stickies, and 300+ ready-made templates including community retro boards. Design and product teams already living in Figma get retros without buying a second tool, backed by Figma's SAML/SCIM, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and EU data hosting on Organization and Enterprise plans. Voting sessions, audio chat and no-account guest links all require a paid team.

Full review →
Mural logo

Mural

6.6

Visual collaboration whiteboard with a mature facilitation toolkit and AI-assisted sessions

Mural is a long-established visual collaboration platform — an infinite canvas with sticky notes, anonymous voting, timers, Private Mode, hundreds of workshop templates (eight of them retro-specific), AI clustering, summary and emotional-tone classification, and a Facilitation Superpowers toolkit (Outline, Timer, Voting, Private Mode) refined for over a decade. Best-in-class enterprise posture: SSO, SCIM, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR and NA/EU/APAC data residency.

Full review →

Summary

FigJam scores 7.2 overall and is best for design and product teams already on Figma who want retros on the same platform as their design files, with playful engagement and AI clustering. It offers a free tier.

Mural scores 6.6 overall and is best for workshop-heavy teams (design, product, agile coaching) that want a polished facilitation canvas with strong retro templates and enterprise-grade controls. It offers a free tier.

FigJam leads on value, fun factor, open platform and enterprise-grade. Mural leads on retro toolkit, AI & insights and integrations.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, FigJam edges ahead with an overall score of 7.2. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

FigJam
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit4.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor9.0
AI & Insights5.0
Integrations6.0
Open Platform8.5
Enterprise-grade9.5
Mural
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value5.0
Fun Factor6.5
AI & Insights5.5
Integrations7.5
Open Platform7.0
Enterprise-grade9.0
DetailFigJamMural
CategoryWhiteboardWhiteboard
Team sizeMid-marketMid-market
Free tierYesYes
Free limitStarter: 3 FigJam files per team (unlimited personal drafts), 150 AI credits/day (500/month), templates, timer and music, 30-day version history — no voting sessions, audio chat or open (no-account) sessionsUnlimited murals but only the 3 most recently created stay editable (older go view-only); unlimited members and visitors; no Mural AI
Starting price$3/user/mo$9.99/user/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people~$72/mo (24 Collab seats × $3, annual) — more if hosts need Full seats$240/mo billed annually
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20122011
HQSan Francisco, USSan Francisco, US
Data residencyUnited States · European UnionUnited States · European Union · Asia-Pacific
LanguagesEnglish only9 (English, Spanish, German, …)
Export formatsPDF · Image · CSVImage · PDF · PowerPoint · HTML · CSV
Features3939
Integrations108

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityFigJamMural
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action itemsnote
Action trackingnote
Team Insights
Pollingnote
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous inputnote
Independent votingnote
Async mode
Agile Estimationsnotenote
Health Checks
Team Kudosnote
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asananotenote
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluencenote
GitHubnotenote
GitLab
Jiranotenote
Linearnote
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.comnote
Notionnotenote
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trellonote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioningnotenote
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks
MCP servernotenote

FigJam — pros

  • + Cheap $3/user/mo Collab seat unlocks unlimited boards without a full Figma editor seat
  • + Free Starter tier includes real AI credits (150/day, 500/month), 300+ templates, the timer and music
  • + Same login and platform as Figma — zero friction for design-led teams
  • + Playful, engaging UX — stamps, emotes, high-fives, music, cursor chat — lifts retro fun factor
  • + Strong enterprise posture inherited from Figma: SAML, SCIM, activity logs, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, EU data hosting on Enterprise

FigJam — cons

  • No native action-item tracking, recurring retros or health checks
  • Anonymity is weak — votes reveal who voted once the session ends, and stickies always carry a name
  • Official connectors embed Figma files in Jira/Confluence/Linear/Notion rather than pushing action items out; GitHub-issue creation is a community widget; no Azure DevOps
  • Free Starter caps a team at 3 FigJam files and excludes voting sessions, audio chat and no-account guest links
  • Built primarily for designers — the canvas paradigm is fiddly for structured retros, and large boards get sluggish

Mural — pros

  • + Mature facilitation toolkit — Outline, Timer, Voting, Private Mode — refined over 10+ years
  • + Anonymous where it counts: votes hide who voted, and Private Mode can keep sticky authors hidden even after reveal
  • + Best-in-class enterprise posture: SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, SSO/SAML, SCIM, NA/EU/APAC residency
  • + Two-way Jira and Azure DevOps sync via interactive work-item cards turns sticky notes into tracked issues
  • + Polished UX, especially for facilitators running synchronous workshops

Mural — cons

  • Per-seat pricing: a 24-person org pays ~$240/mo on the Team+ tier (annual), well above retro-native tools at that headcount
  • No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal team-pulse
  • No recurring retros, action carryover or cross-team rollup — facilitators rebuild structure each sprint
  • AI (clustering, summary, tone Classify) helps inside a session but doesn't track trends across retros
  • SSO/SAML needs the $17.99/user/mo Business tier; SCIM, audit logs and data residency are Enterprise-only

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.