Retrospective Tools

Estimioo vs Kollabe

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Estimioo logo

Estimioo

4.6

AI-powered planning poker, retrospectives and standups for agile teams

Estimioo is a lightweight, browser-based agile-ceremony tool that bundles AI-assisted planning poker, a 42-format sprint retrospective board and async daily standups into one shared workspace. The centre of gravity is still estimation, but the retro module is a real one: one-click formats, a 2–25 minute session timer, per-card thumbs-up voting, synced icebreakers, twelve ambient and music tracks, and a Claude-powered summary that returns team mood, key themes and ranked action items. What it is not is a facilitation suite — retro cards carry their author's name and avatar with no anonymity option anywhere in the product, and there is no grouping, no dot-vote budget and no action-item owners or carry-over between sprints.

Full review →
Kollabe logo

Kollabe

6.8

Agile meetings made easy — retros, standups and planning poker

Kollabe began life as a planning poker tool and now runs four rituals from one workspace: estimation, sprint retrospectives, async standups and icebreakers. The retro board is deeper than its marketing suggests — drag-to-group with optional AI clustering, dot voting configurable per board or per column, a phase timer with audio alerts, a guided workflow with auto-advance, and action items carrying owner, due date, priority and a link back to the feedback card. Exports run to PDF, CSV, JSON, Markdown, HTML, JPEG and Confluence, with action items pushed to Jira, GitHub or Linear. Billing is flat per team space rather than per seat. There are no recurring retros, no health-check instrument and no compliance certifications.

Full review →

Summary

Estimioo scores 4.6 overall and is best for small, distributed agile teams who want fast AI-assisted planning poker and async standups at near-zero cost, plus a genuinely usable 42-format retro board — and who don't need anonymity, grouping, or action-item follow-through across sprints. It offers a free tier.

Kollabe scores 6.8 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams running poker, retros and standups who want one cheap, playful tool — and don't need health checks, recurring retros or a compliance story. It offers a free tier.

Estimioo leads on value. Kollabe leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Kollabe edges ahead with an overall score of 6.8. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Estimioo
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit4.5
Value9.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights4.5
Integrations2.5
Open Platform1.0
Enterprise-grade2.0
Kollabe
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor8.5
AI & Insights7.0
Integrations6.0
Open Platform6.0
Enterprise-grade3.0
DetailEstimiooKollabe
CategoryAll-in-One AgileRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limitUp to 10 participants, 5 sessions/month (estimation + retro combined), 5 AI estimates/month, 1 AI retro summary per retro, 1 standup room with 7-day history, 1-hour session expiry, CSV export10 participants per meeting, 4 retrospectives/month, 7-day board history, 1 survey per board; no AI, exports, API or MCP
Starting price$7/workspace/mo$29/mo per space (unlimited members)
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$7/mo (Team plan is flat per-workspace with unlimited participants, not per-seat; separate projects per team need the quote-only Enterprise tier)$87/mo (3 Premium spaces × $29; each space allows unlimited members)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded2023
HQSydney, Australia
Data residencyAustralia
Languages5 (English, German, Spanish, …)6 (English, German, Spanish, …)
Export formatsCSV · JSONCSV · PDF · Markdown · Image · JSON · HTML · Confluence · Jira
Features2550
Integrations46

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityEstimiooKollabe
Features
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous input
Health Checksnotenote
Action trackingnote
Async modenote
Whiteboardnote
Independent votingnote
Polling
Icebreaker gamesnote
Agile Estimationsnote
Team Kudos
AI grouping/clustering
AI action itemsnote
AI Summariesnote
Team Insightsnote
In-meeting AI assistantnote
Action dashboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluencenote
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranote
Linearnote
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknotenote
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooks
MCP servernote

Estimioo — pros

  • + Genuinely cheap — flat <strong>$7/workspace/mo</strong> with unlimited participants, plus a usable free tier
  • + 42 one-click retro formats, a 2–25 minute session timer and per-card upvoting — all verified in a live board
  • + Unusually fun for the price: 340+ synced icebreakers, twelve ambient and music tracks, and 16 live emoji reactions
  • + One-click Claude retro summary returns team mood, key themes and ranked action items with <em>Add all to board</em>
  • + Full in-product UI in five languages (EN/DE/ES/FR/PT); guests join by link or QR with no signup

Estimioo — cons

  • Retro cards are <strong>attributed</strong> — author name and avatar on every note, with no anonymity option anywhere in the product
  • No grouping or clustering — dragging a card only reorders it or moves it between columns; no dot-vote budget, no action-item owners or due dates, no carry-over between retros
  • Slack and Teams are clipboard-copy buttons rather than integrations; Jira is estimation-only with write-back still on the roadmap, and there's no API, webhooks or MCP
  • No SOC 2, ISO 27001, DPA or data-residency option, and the privacy policy still dates to April 2025 — the quote-only Enterprise tier's SSO claim remains unpublished and unverified
  • Social proof is entirely unattributed — <em>450+ teams</em>, a <em>4.8</em> rating and a logo wall naming Accenture, Deloitte, Thoughtworks and Xero, with no G2, Capterra or Product Hunt listing to corroborate any of it

Kollabe — pros

  • + Flat per-space pricing — $29/mo buys unlimited members, so three teams of eight cost $87/mo total
  • + Deeper retro board than the marketing implies: drag-to-group plus AI clustering, dot voting per board or per column, a phase timer with audio alerts, and a guided workflow that auto-advances when everyone marks ready
  • + Action items carry owner, due date, priority, comments and a link back to the feedback card — and push one-click to Jira, GitHub or Linear
  • + Official OAuth MCP server (vendor states 46 tools) and a documented REST API on every paid plan; exports to PDF, CSV, JSON, Markdown, HTML, JPEG and Confluence
  • + Unusually playful: synchronised meeting music, AI-generated backgrounds, kudos with confetti, drawings and stickers, and a 1,100-strong themed template library

Kollabe — cons

  • No recurring or scheduled retros — every session is created by hand
  • No health-check instrument: a Spotify-style board template and a handful of 1–5 pulse polls, but no radar, custom model or trend chart. The vendor advertises a 1–10 Team Health Score inside its weekly Team Insights email; the report is generated server-side and we could not verify it
  • Both paid tiers cap a space at <strong>5 facilitators/admins</strong> however many members it has; lifting it means an Enterprise contract
  • Slack is standup-only (no retro summaries or actions to a channel); no Microsoft Teams
  • No SOC 2, ISO 27001 or published GDPR posture, and all data sits in Australia with no EU or US option; SSO and SLAs are Enterprise contact-sales
  • Effectively a one-person company, and the changelog has been silent since 31 May 2026

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.