Estimioo
3.8Free planning poker, retrospectives and standups for Scrum teams
Estimioo is a lightweight, browser-based agile-ceremony tool that bundles AI-assisted planning poker, a template-driven sprint retrospective board and async daily standups into one shared workspace. The product's centre of gravity is estimation, but the retro module has grown since launch: the vendor now lists a library of retrospective formats (Start/Stop/Continue, Sailboat, Mad/Sad/Glad, 4Ls, Starfish, Sprint Timeline and more) rather than a single fixed board. It's still a reflection-and-summary tool, not a deep facilitation suite with dot voting, grouping and owned action items.
Full review →
FigJam
7.1Figma's whiteboard with AI-assisted clustering, voting and a free tier that includes meaningful AI credits
FigJam is the whiteboard product inside Figma — sticky notes, voting, timer, audio, music, expressive cursor stamps, an AI co-pilot that clusters and summarises sticky notes, and dozens of community retro templates. Sits inside the Figma platform so design and product teams already living there get retros without buying a second tool, with Figma's strong SSO/SCIM and SOC 2 enterprise posture on Org+/Enterprise plans.
Full review →Summary
Estimioo scores 3.8 overall and is best for small, distributed Scrum teams who mainly want fast, AI-assisted planning poker and async standups, and want a template-driven reflection board for retros rather than a full facilitation suite with voting, grouping and owned action items. It offers a free tier.
FigJam scores 7.1 overall and is best for design and product teams already on Figma who want retros on the same platform as their design files, with playful engagement and AI clustering. It offers a free tier.
Estimioo leads on value. FigJam leads on retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.
Across our eight scoring dimensions, FigJam edges ahead with an overall score of 7.1. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.
Scores compared
| Detail | Estimioo | FigJam |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-in-One Agile | Whiteboard |
| Team size | Small | Mid-market |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Free limit | Up to 10 participants, 5 sessions/month, 5 AI estimates/month, 1-hour session expiry | Starter: 3 FigJam boards per team (unlimited personal drafts), 150 AI credits/day (500/month), community templates |
| Starting price | $7/workspace/mo | $3/user/mo |
| Est. 3 teams × 8 people | $7/mo (Team plan is flat per-workspace, not per-seat) | ~$72/mo (24 Collab seats × $3, annual) — more if hosts need Full seats |
| Enterprise | No | Yes |
| Founded | — | 2012 |
| HQ | — | San Francisco, US |
| Data residency | — | United States |
| Languages | English only | English only |
| Export formats | CSV | PDF · Image · CSV |
| Features | 13 | 39 |
| Integrations | 1 | 9 |
Feature & integration comparison
Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.
| Capability | Estimioo | FigJam |
|---|---|---|
| Features | ||
| AI Summaries | ✓note | ✓ |
| AI grouping/clustering | — | ✓ |
| AI action items | — | ✓note |
| Action tracking | ✓note | — |
| Team Insights | ✓note | — |
| Polling | — | ✓ |
| Action dashboard | — | — |
| Custom templates | — | ✓ |
| Anonymous input | ✓note | — |
| Independent voting | — | ✓ |
| Async mode | ✓note | ✓ |
| Agile Estimations | ✓note | ✓note |
| Health Checks | — | — |
| Team Kudos | — | ✓note |
| Whiteboard | — | ✓ |
| Integrations | ||
| Asana | — | ✓ |
| Azure DevOps | — | — |
| Basecamp | — | — |
| ClickUp | — | — |
| Confluence | — | ✓ |
| GitHub | — | ✓note |
| GitLab | — | — |
| Jira | ✓note | ✓ |
| Linear | — | ✓note |
| Microsoft Teams | — | ✓note |
| Monday.com | — | ✓note |
| Notion | — | ✓note |
| Shortcut | — | — |
| Slack | — | ✓ |
| Trello | — | — |
| Security & Privacy | ||
| SOC 2 | — | ✓ |
| GDPR | — | ✓ |
| SSO / SAML | — | ✓note |
| SCIM provisioning | — | ✓note |
| ISO 27001 | — | ✓ |
| On-premises | — | — |
| Public API | — | ✓ |
| Webhooks | — | ✓ |
| MCP server | — | ✓note |
Estimioo — pros
- + Genuinely cheap — flat $7/workspace/mo Team plan (not per-seat) and a usable free tier
- + Fast, no-friction planning poker with multiple scales and hidden-until-reveal voting
- + AI story-point suggestions and estimation-accuracy tracking, powered by Claude with zero data retention
- + Guests join without signup via link or QR code — low overhead for distributed teams
- + Three ceremonies (poker, retro, standup) in one shared workspace
Estimioo — cons
- − Retro board is reflection-and-summary only — no dot voting, grouping, anonymity, phase timer or action items with owners and carry-over, even with the expanded template library
- − Verified AI is estimation-focused; the advertised Claude retro summaries (mood, themes, action items) couldn't be verified hands-on
- − No Slack/Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps integrations; Jira is a paste-URL preview for poker only
- − No SSO, SOC 2, audit logs or published data-residency — not built for enterprise procurement
- − Free sessions expire after 1 hour and cap at 5/month; no recurring retros or persistent retro history
FigJam — pros
- + Cheap $3/user/mo Collab seat unlocks unlimited boards without a full Figma editor seat
- + Free tier includes real AI credits (150/day, 500/month) and the full retro toolkit
- + Same login and platform as Figma — zero friction for design-led teams
- + Playful, engaging UX (audio, music, stamps, expressive cursors) lifts retro fun factor
- + Strong enterprise posture inherited from Figma: SAML, SCIM, SOC 2, ISO 27001
FigJam — cons
- − No native action-item tracking, recurring retros or health checks
- − Anonymous mode is weak — no built-in 'private until reveal' equivalent
- − Issue-tracker links (Jira, GitHub) are widget-based, not action-item sync; no Azure DevOps
- − Free Starter caps teams at 3 FigJam boards — a recurring retro practice outgrows it fast
- − Built primarily for designers; agile coaches sometimes find the canvas paradigm fiddly for structured retros
Keep comparing
Other Estimioo comparisons
Other FigJam comparisons
See alternatives
Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.