Retrospective Tools

Estimioo vs Miro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Estimioo logo

Estimioo

3.8

Free planning poker, retrospectives and standups for Scrum teams

Estimioo is a lightweight, browser-based agile-ceremony tool that bundles AI-assisted planning poker, a template-driven sprint retrospective board and async daily standups into one shared workspace. The product's centre of gravity is estimation, but the retro module has grown since launch: the vendor now lists a library of retrospective formats (Start/Stop/Continue, Sailboat, Mad/Sad/Glad, 4Ls, Starfish, Sprint Timeline and more) rather than a single fixed board. It's still a reflection-and-summary tool, not a deep facilitation suite with dot voting, grouping and owned action items.

Full review →
Miro logo

Miro

7.0

Innovation Workspace where retros happen on the same canvas as discovery and planning

Miro is the dominant online whiteboard, now repositioned as an AI-powered Innovation Workspace. It pairs an infinite canvas with a huge template library (300+ retro formats among thousands of community templates), AI clustering by sentiment/keyword/author, Sidekicks (AI teammates) and Flows (multi-step AI workflows), real-time + async collaboration, and a 250+ app marketplace including Jira, Azure DevOps, Asana, Linear, Confluence, Slack and Microsoft Teams.

Full review →

Summary

Estimioo scores 3.8 overall and is best for small, distributed Scrum teams who mainly want fast, AI-assisted planning poker and async standups, and want a template-driven reflection board for retros rather than a full facilitation suite with voting, grouping and owned action items. It offers a free tier.

Miro scores 7.0 overall and is best for large product, design and engineering orgs that already run discovery, planning and retros on one canvas and want AI clustering plus deep Jira/Azure DevOps/Asana sync. It offers a free tier.

Estimioo leads on value. Miro leads on retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Miro edges ahead with an overall score of 7.0. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Estimioo
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit3.5
Value9.0
Fun Factor3.5
AI & Insights3.0
Integrations2.0
Open Platform0.5
Enterprise-grade1.5
Miro
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value5.0
Fun Factor7.0
AI & Insights7.0
Integrations9.0
Open Platform6.5
Enterprise-grade9.5
DetailEstimiooMiro
CategoryAll-in-One AgileWhiteboard
Team sizeSmallEnterprise
Free tierYesYes
Free limitUp to 10 participants, 5 sessions/month, 5 AI estimates/month, 1-hour session expiry3 editable boards, ~10 AI credits/mo, full template library, 250+ app marketplace; no private boards or two-way integrations
Starting price$7/workspace/mo$8/user/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$7/mo (Team plan is flat per-workspace, not per-seat)$192/mo billed annually (Starter, 24 seats)
EnterpriseNoYes
Founded2011
HQAmsterdam, NL
Data residencyUnited States · European Union · Australia
LanguagesEnglish only8 (English, Spanish, German, …)
Export formatsCSVImage · PDF · CSV
Features1337
Integrations111

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityEstimiooMiro
Features
AI Summariesnote
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action trackingnotenote
Team Insightsnote
Pollingnote
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous inputnotenote
Independent voting
Async modenote
Agile Estimationsnotenote
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asananote
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHubnote
GitLab
Jiranotenote
Linearnote
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trellonote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks
MCP servernote

Estimioo — pros

  • + Genuinely cheap — flat $7/workspace/mo Team plan (not per-seat) and a usable free tier
  • + Fast, no-friction planning poker with multiple scales and hidden-until-reveal voting
  • + AI story-point suggestions and estimation-accuracy tracking, powered by Claude with zero data retention
  • + Guests join without signup via link or QR code — low overhead for distributed teams
  • + Three ceremonies (poker, retro, standup) in one shared workspace

Estimioo — cons

  • Retro board is reflection-and-summary only — no dot voting, grouping, anonymity, phase timer or action items with owners and carry-over, even with the expanded template library
  • Verified AI is estimation-focused; the advertised Claude retro summaries (mood, themes, action items) couldn't be verified hands-on
  • No Slack/Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps integrations; Jira is a paste-URL preview for poker only
  • No SSO, SOC 2, audit logs or published data-residency — not built for enterprise procurement
  • Free sessions expire after 1 hour and cap at 5/month; no recurring retros or persistent retro history

Miro — pros

  • + Enormous template library (5,000+) and Miroverse community for retro formats
  • + AI clustering groups sticky notes by sentiment, tag, author and keyword; Sidekicks and Flows extend AI deeper into the canvas
  • + Best-in-class integration catalog (Jira, Azure DevOps, Asana, Linear, ClickUp, Confluence, Slack, Teams) with two-way card sync
  • + Enterprise-grade SSO, SCIM, audit logs, ISO 27001, ISO 42001 (AI governance) and EU/US/AU data residency
  • + Same canvas works for discovery, planning and retros — no context switching

Miro — cons

  • Per-seat pricing: a 24-person org pays ~$192/mo on the Starter tier (annual), well above retro-native tools at that headcount
  • No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal team-pulse
  • No recurring retros, scheduling, action carryover or cross-team rollup — facilitators rebuild structure each sprint
  • Full two-way card sync (Linear, ClickUp, Azure DevOps) and SSO sit behind the $20/user/mo Business tier; SCIM and audit logs only on Enterprise (30-seat min)
  • No built-in retro report or action-tracker dashboard

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.