Retrospective Tools

Spreo vs RetroTeam

Une comparaison détaillée des notes, des tarifs, des fonctionnalités et des intégrations pour vous aider à choisir l'outil de rétrospective qui vous convient.

Spreo logo

Spreo

5.9

Tableau blanc collaboratif ludique pour les équipes agiles

Spreo (formerly Metro Retro, then Ludi — renamed Spreo on 1 July 2026 after a US trademark cease-and-desist) is a visual agile collaboration whiteboard with 150+ templates spanning retros, planning poker, icebreakers and futurespectives. Its illustrated canvas and board gadgets — a shared Jukebox music player, timers, spinners, buzzers, confetti, throwable hats — make ceremonies feel engaging. Since late October 2026 it is priced by role: $13 a month for each Editor who runs sessions, $3 for regular team members and nothing for visitors on open boards, with Jira, Linear, SSO, PDF export and a beta MCP server all on the one Team plan. In-product AI still stops at beta sticky-note clustering.

Full review →
RetroTeam logo

RetroTeam

4.6

AI-first retro tool, now shut down: its website and app are offline

RetroTeam was a focused, AI-first retrospective app — capture, group, vote, act, with Jira hand-off. Its vendor announced a wind-down and moved to ChannelPulse, an unrelated interview-coaching product, and by 5 November 2026 both the website and the app were offline.

Full review →

Summary

Spreo scores 5.9 overall and is best for agile teams who want retros, planning and workshops to feel visual and fun on a Jira or Linear backlog, with a few paid facilitators and everyone else on cheap Collaborator seats or free visitor links — and who would get real value from driving boards with an AI assistant over MCP. It offers paid plans from $13/Editor/mo billed annually ($16 monthly); Collaborators $3/user/mo ($4), visitors free.

RetroTeam scores 4.6 overall and is best for nobody: the app is offline. Former users need a replacement, and there is no published way to recover old boards or reports. It is no longer available.

undefined est en tête dans la catégorie boîte à outils rétro, facteur de plaisir, intégrations, plateforme ouverte et destiné aux entreprises. undefined est en tête dans la catégorie valeur et IA et analyses.

Sur l'ensemble de nos huit critères d'évaluation, Spreo se démarque avec une note globale de 5.9. Cela dit, le choix qui vous convient le mieux dépend de votre équipe — consultez ci-dessous l'analyse détaillée par critère.

Scores compared

Spreo
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit6.5
Value7.5
Fun Factor8.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations4.0
Open Platform6.0
Enterprise-grade4.5
RetroTeam
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor4.0
AI & Insights6.5
Integrations2.5
Open Platform0.5
Enterprise-grade1.0
DetailSpreoRetroTeam
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierNoNo
Free limitNo free plan for teams — 15-day Team trial. Spreo Lite (one board stored in your browser, up to 3 people, no sign-in) is a free taster, not a team plan—
Starting price$13/Editor/mo billed annually ($16 monthly); Collaborators $3/user/mo ($4), visitors freeN/A — shut down
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$102/mo billed annually (Team plan — 3 Editors x $13 + 21 Collaborators x $3); $132/mo billed monthlyN/A — shut down
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20192022
HQUKOakland, California, US
Data residencyEuropean UnionUnited States
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsPDF · CSV · HTML · Markdown · JSON · JiraPDF
Features4622
Integrations21

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilitySpreoRetroTeam
Features
Custom templates✓✓note
Anonymous input✓note✓
Health Checks——
Action tracking✓✓
Async mode——
Whiteboard✓—
Independent voting✓✓
Polling✓note—
Icebreaker games✓note—
Agile Estimations✓—
Team Kudos✓note—
AI grouping/clustering✓note✓
AI action items—✓
AI Summaries—✓
Team Insights—✓
In-meeting AI assistant——
Action dashboard✓note✓
Integrations
Asana——
Azure DevOps——
Basecamp——
ClickUp——
Confluence——
GitHub——
GitLab——
Jira✓note✓note
Linear✓note—
Microsoft Teams——
Monday.com——
Notion——
Shortcut——
Slack——
Trello——
Security & Privacy
SOC 2——
GDPR✓✓note
SSO / SAML✓note—
SCIM provisioning——
ISO 27001——
On-premises✓note—
Public API✓note—
Webhooks——
MCP server✓note—

Spreo — pros

  • + Genuinely delightful, illustrated UI with a gadget shelf built for live sessions: a shared Jukebox, timers, spinners, buzzers and a Voter panel, plus confetti and throwable hats
  • + Broad template library (150+) covering retros, icebreakers, planning poker, futurespectives, planning and estimation
  • + Hide Identities and Private Writing make writing <em>and</em> voting anonymous, with fully configurable voting rounds
  • + Actions carry owners and due dates, with daily and weekly reminder emails on by default and a cross-board Action Items dashboard
  • + Role-based Team plan keeps big teams cheap ($3 Collaborators, free visitors on open boards) and includes two-way Jira, Linear cards, SSO, PDF export and the beta MCP server

Spreo — cons

  • − No async retro mode, no recurring or scheduled retros, and no health-check product; mood and radar work happen on whiteboard templates only
  • − Integrations stop at Jira and Linear — no Slack, Teams, Confluence or GitHub; Azure DevOps is on the pricing page but was still <em>"coming soon"</em> in the October 2026 release notes
  • − In-product AI limited to beta sticky-note clustering — no summaries, action-item extraction, sentiment or coaching; MCP moves the AI into your own assistant rather than the board
  • − Every facilitator needs a $13/month Editor seat, and the free Lite board holds three people and lives in one browser
  • − Desktop and laptop only, and no SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own: the certifications on its security page are DigitalOcean's

RetroTeam — pros

  • + Un déroulement rétro, rigoureux et bien défini — capture, regroupement par IA, vote, action — avec un chronomètre à chaque étape
  • + Les suggestions de regroupement proposées par l'IA peuvent être acceptées ou refusées pour chaque carte ; elles ne s'appliquent pas de manière globale.
  • + Tarification forfaitaire : 30 $ par mois pour 5 équipes et 50 utilisateurs, ce qui est bien inférieur aux concurrents pratiquant une tarification par poste
  • + Les participants peuvent se connecter via un lien, sans avoir à créer de compte
  • + Tableau de bord des actions à l'échelle de l'organisation, indiquant le responsable, le statut et la date d'échéance, ainsi que des liens unidirectionnels vers Jira

RetroTeam — cons

  • − <strong>Shut down:</strong> the website and the app at main.retroteam.ai were both offline when checked on 5 November 2026; the team has moved to ChannelPulse, an unrelated interview-coaching product
  • − No shutdown date, export window or migration guidance was ever published; the only export had been a PDF report, with no API, webhooks or MCP to pull history out another way
  • − Jira est la seule intégration disponible — ni Slack, ni Teams, ni GitHub, ni Linear, ni Azure DevOps
  • − Pas de vérifications d'état, de rétrospectives régulières, de planification, de mode asynchrone ni de kudos
  • − Pas de SSO, SCIM, SOC 2 ni de journaux d'audit ; l'hébergement est limité aux États-Unis, sans option de résidence dans l'UE

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.