Retrospective Tools

Reetro vs RetroFlow

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Reetro logo

Reetro

6.0

Fun, easy and AI-powered online retrospectives

Reetro is a lightweight retrospective tool with a genuinely free tier, a scheduler that auto-creates recurring boards, and AI-powered paid tiers covering meeting summaries, sentiment analysis, AI card grouping, customizable health checks and an action tracker. SSO, 2FA and audit logs start on the $10/team Pro plan rather than an enterprise tier. ISO 27001 is claimed at the vendor level; SOC 2 is described as compliance on SOC 2-certified infrastructure rather than a published Reetro-level Type 2 audit.

Full review →
RetroFlow logo

RetroFlow

3.4

Your team's favourite way to retro

RetroFlow is a free, no-signup retrospective board built by solo developer Prashant Meena, with colourful boards, real-time collaboration, 11 ready-made templates, anonymous feedback, dot voting, action items and PDF/Excel export. Participants join a shared link in one click with no account; the whole product is free with no paid tiers or locked features.

Full review →

Summary

Reetro scores 6.0 overall and is best for small to mid-sized agile teams who want a low-cost, easy retro board with AI summaries, customizable health checks, SSO from the $10/team tier and Jira/Azure DevOps export — with a flat-rate org-wide tier if you outgrow per-team pricing. It offers a free tier.

RetroFlow scores 3.4 overall and is best for small or ad-hoc teams who want a genuinely free, zero-friction retro board they can share with one link — no signup, no payment and no setup, accepting that there is no timer, no integrations, no AI and no enterprise controls. It offers a free tier.

Reetro leads on retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade. RetroFlow leads on ease of use.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Reetro edges ahead with an overall score of 6.0. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Reetro
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit6.5
Value9.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights6.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform2.0
Enterprise-grade6.0
RetroFlow
Ease of Use8.0
Retro Toolkit4.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor4.5
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations0.0
Open Platform1.0
Enterprise-grade1.0
DetailReetroRetroFlow
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limit3 teams, 9 members per team, 10 active boards per team, 4 columns, 50 guests, 1 health check/monthEverything is free — all 11 templates, custom boards, saved layouts, real-time collaboration, anonymous feedback, dot voting, action items and PDF/Excel export, with no account required to join a board
Starting price$10/team/moFree
Est. 3 teams × 8 peopleFree (within free tier)Free (no paid tier)
EnterpriseYesNo
Founded2019
HQCopenhagen, Denmark
Data residency
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsCSV · Word · Email · Jira · ConfluencePDF · Excel
Features417
Integrations60

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityReetroRetroFlow
Features
AI Summariesnote
AI grouping/clusteringnote
AI action items
Action trackingnote
Team Insights
Pollingnote
Action dashboard
Custom templatesnotenote
Anonymous inputnotenote
Independent votingnotenote
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudosnote
Whiteboardnote
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluencenote
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trellonote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premisesnote
Public API
Webhooks
MCP server

Reetro — pros

  • + Genuinely free tier, no credit card — 3 teams, 9 members and 50 guests covers a 24-person org
  • + <strong>SSO (Google, OneLogin, Azure AD, Okta), 2FA and audit logs start on the $10/team Pro plan</strong>, not an enterprise tier
  • + Scheduler auto-creates the next retro board weekly or every 2–4 weeks with layout and settings pre-applied
  • + AI meeting summaries, sentiment analysis and automatic card grouping on paid, alongside customizable health checks, polls and a happiness index
  • + Trust center is actively maintained — policy pack, sub-processor list and an AI governance portal all published or refreshed in 2026

Reetro — cons

  • Free plan capped at 3 teams, 9 members, 10 active boards and 4 columns, with both anonymity and multi-voting paid-only
  • Pro Unlimited's own marketing is self-contradictory — the FAQ and plan table call it flat org-wide $49/mo while the plan card badge says PER TEAM with a 180-member cap
  • Team, comparative and monthly reporting are ticked on the paid columns yet tagged <em>coming soon</em> in the same table — verify the reporting story before you buy
  • On-premises is sold as a Pro Unlimited feature but the tooltip on that plan card says 'coming soon'
  • No published Reetro-level SOC 2 Type 2 audit (their trust center lists SOC 2 as 'compliant', not certified) and no SCIM
  • No public API, webhooks or MCP server; no GitHub/Linear; help-doc footers still read 2020–2021 and there's no public changelog

RetroFlow — pros

  • + Genuinely free with no paid tiers, no paywalled features and no account required to join a board
  • + Anonymous feedback — participants contribute with no signup, email or PII collected
  • + Three-step setup — pick a template, share the link, run the retro; participants join in one click and notes sync live
  • + Eleven ready-made formats, up from seven — Sailboat, DAKI, Plus/Delta and Three Little Pigs are all new since the last review
  • + <strong>PDF and Excel export</strong> of the finished board — new this quarter, and the only route to getting your data out
  • + Light personalisation — custom column names, 2-6 columns, colour palettes and per-note emoji, with reusable saved layouts

RetroFlow — cons

  • No timer or phase controls — three separate timer requests sit unshipped on the vendor's own public roadmap, and there is no countdown anywhere in the app
  • No grouping of similar cards and no carry-over of previous action items — both still <em>Planned</em> on the roadmap
  • No integrations at all — nothing pushes to Jira, Linear, Slack or Teams, and there is no public API, webhooks or AI
  • No health checks, recurring retros, mood tracking or cross-team reporting
  • No enterprise security or compliance — no SOC 2, SSO, SCIM or audit logs, no GDPR statement in the privacy policy, and boards are private only by unguessable URL since there are no accounts
  • Built and run by a solo developer (Prashant Meena) with no support team or SLA — support routes to a personal WhatsApp number and LinkedIn DMs, and the free-tier backend still shows a ~10s cold start plus first-load errors

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.