FigJam
7.1Figma's whiteboard with AI-assisted clustering, voting and a free tier that includes meaningful AI credits
FigJam is the whiteboard product inside Figma — sticky notes, voting, timer, audio, music, expressive cursor stamps, an AI co-pilot that clusters and summarises sticky notes, and dozens of community retro templates. Sits inside the Figma platform so design and product teams already living there get retros without buying a second tool, with Figma's strong SSO/SCIM and SOC 2 enterprise posture on Org+/Enterprise plans.
Full review →
RetroFlow
3.3Your team's favourite way to retro
RetroFlow is a free, no-signup retrospective board built by solo developer Prashant Meena, with colourful boards, real-time collaboration, 7 ready-made templates, anonymous feedback, dot voting and action items. Participants join a shared link in one click with no account; the whole product is free with no paid tiers or locked features.
Full review →Summary
FigJam scores 7.1 overall and is best for design and product teams already on Figma who want retros on the same platform as their design files, with playful engagement and AI clustering. It offers a free tier.
RetroFlow scores 3.3 overall and is best for small or ad-hoc teams who want a genuinely free, zero-friction retro board they can share with one link — no signup, no payment and no setup, accepting that there are no integrations, AI or enterprise controls. It offers a free tier.
FigJam leads on retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade. RetroFlow leads on ease of use and value.
Across our eight scoring dimensions, FigJam edges ahead with an overall score of 7.1. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.
Scores compared
| Detail | FigJam | RetroFlow |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Whiteboard | Retrospectives |
| Team size | Mid-market | Small |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Free limit | Starter: 3 FigJam boards per team (unlimited personal drafts), 150 AI credits/day (500/month), community templates | Everything is free — all 7 templates, real-time collaboration, anonymous feedback, dot voting and action items, with no account required to join a board |
| Starting price | $3/user/mo | Free |
| Est. 3 teams × 8 people | ~$72/mo (24 Collab seats × $3, annual) — more if hosts need Full seats | Free (no paid tier) |
| Enterprise | Yes | No |
| Founded | 2012 | — |
| HQ | San Francisco, US | — |
| Data residency | United States | — |
| Languages | English only | English only |
| Export formats | PDF · Image · CSV | — |
| Features | 39 | 7 |
| Integrations | 9 | 0 |
Feature & integration comparison
Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.
| Capability | FigJam | RetroFlow |
|---|---|---|
| Features | ||
| AI Summaries | ✓ | — |
| AI grouping/clustering | ✓ | — |
| AI action items | ✓note | — |
| Action tracking | — | ✓ |
| Team Insights | — | — |
| Polling | ✓ | — |
| Action dashboard | — | — |
| Custom templates | ✓ | ✓note |
| Anonymous input | — | ✓note |
| Independent voting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Async mode | ✓ | — |
| Agile Estimations | ✓note | — |
| Health Checks | — | — |
| Team Kudos | ✓note | — |
| Whiteboard | ✓ | — |
| Integrations | ||
| Asana | ✓ | — |
| Azure DevOps | — | — |
| Basecamp | — | — |
| ClickUp | — | — |
| Confluence | ✓ | — |
| GitHub | ✓note | — |
| GitLab | — | — |
| Jira | ✓ | — |
| Linear | ✓note | — |
| Microsoft Teams | ✓note | — |
| Monday.com | ✓note | — |
| Notion | ✓note | — |
| Shortcut | — | — |
| Slack | ✓ | — |
| Trello | — | — |
| Security & Privacy | ||
| SOC 2 | ✓ | — |
| GDPR | ✓ | — |
| SSO / SAML | ✓note | — |
| SCIM provisioning | ✓note | — |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ | — |
| On-premises | — | — |
| Public API | ✓ | — |
| Webhooks | ✓ | — |
| MCP server | ✓note | — |
FigJam — pros
- + Cheap $3/user/mo Collab seat unlocks unlimited boards without a full Figma editor seat
- + Free tier includes real AI credits (150/day, 500/month) and the full retro toolkit
- + Same login and platform as Figma — zero friction for design-led teams
- + Playful, engaging UX (audio, music, stamps, expressive cursors) lifts retro fun factor
- + Strong enterprise posture inherited from Figma: SAML, SCIM, SOC 2, ISO 27001
FigJam — cons
- − No native action-item tracking, recurring retros or health checks
- − Anonymous mode is weak — no built-in 'private until reveal' equivalent
- − Issue-tracker links (Jira, GitHub) are widget-based, not action-item sync; no Azure DevOps
- − Free Starter caps teams at 3 FigJam boards — a recurring retro practice outgrows it fast
- − Built primarily for designers; agile coaches sometimes find the canvas paradigm fiddly for structured retros
RetroFlow — pros
- + Genuinely free with no paid tiers, no paywalled features and no account required to join a board
- + Anonymous feedback — participants contribute with no signup, email or PII collected
- + Three-step setup — pick a template, share the link, run the retro; participants join with one click
- + Seven ready-made retrospective formats covering the common reflection patterns
- + Real-time collaboration with live notes, dot voting and shared action items
- + Light personalisation — custom column names, 2-6 columns, 7 colour palettes and 48 emojis
RetroFlow — cons
- − No integrations at all — nothing pushes to Jira, Linear, Slack, Teams or any agile-stack tool
- − No AI features (clustering, summary, action extraction or sentiment)
- − No health checks, recurring retros, mood tracking or cross-team reporting
- − No enterprise security or compliance — no SOC 2, SSO, SCIM or audit logs; the privacy policy confirms only HTTPS and Vercel hosting with Google Analytics/PostHog analytics
- − Built and run by a solo developer (Prashant Meena) with no support team or SLA — support routes to a personal WhatsApp number, and the server shows a cold-start delay (~10s wake-up) plus occasional infrastructure hiccups on first load
- − Boards are private only by unguessable URL — there are no accounts, so no real access control, invite management or board history
Keep comparing
Other FigJam comparisons
Other RetroFlow comparisons
See alternatives
Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.