Retrospective Tools

Mural vs RetroFlow

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Mural logo

Mural

6.6

Visual collaboration whiteboard with a mature facilitation toolkit and AI-assisted sessions

Mural is a long-established visual collaboration platform — an infinite canvas with sticky notes, anonymous voting, timers, Private Mode, hundreds of workshop templates (eight of them retro-specific), AI clustering, summary and emotional-tone classification, and a Facilitation Superpowers toolkit (Outline, Timer, Voting, Private Mode) refined for over a decade. Best-in-class enterprise posture: SSO, SCIM, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR and NA/EU/APAC data residency.

Full review →
RetroFlow logo

RetroFlow

3.4

Your team's favourite way to retro

RetroFlow is a free, no-signup retrospective board built by solo developer Prashant Meena, with colourful boards, real-time collaboration, 11 ready-made templates, anonymous feedback, dot voting, action items and PDF/Excel export. Participants join a shared link in one click with no account; the whole product is free with no paid tiers or locked features.

Full review →

Summary

Mural scores 6.6 overall and is best for workshop-heavy teams (design, product, agile coaching) that want a polished facilitation canvas with strong retro templates and enterprise-grade controls. It offers a free tier.

RetroFlow scores 3.4 overall and is best for small or ad-hoc teams who want a genuinely free, zero-friction retro board they can share with one link — no signup, no payment and no setup, accepting that there is no timer, no integrations, no AI and no enterprise controls. It offers a free tier.

Mural leads on retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade. RetroFlow leads on ease of use and value.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Mural edges ahead with an overall score of 6.6. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Mural
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value5.0
Fun Factor6.5
AI & Insights5.5
Integrations7.5
Open Platform7.0
Enterprise-grade9.0
RetroFlow
Ease of Use8.0
Retro Toolkit4.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor4.5
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations0.0
Open Platform1.0
Enterprise-grade1.0
DetailMuralRetroFlow
CategoryWhiteboardRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limitUnlimited murals but only the 3 most recently created stay editable (older go view-only); unlimited members and visitors; no Mural AIEverything is free — all 11 templates, custom boards, saved layouts, real-time collaboration, anonymous feedback, dot voting, action items and PDF/Excel export, with no account required to join a board
Starting price$9.99/user/moFree
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$240/mo billed annuallyFree (no paid tier)
EnterpriseYesNo
Founded2011
HQSan Francisco, US
Data residencyUnited States · European Union · Asia-Pacific
Languages9 (English, Spanish, German, …)English only
Export formatsImage · PDF · PowerPoint · HTML · CSVPDF · Excel
Features397
Integrations80

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityMuralRetroFlow
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action trackingnotenote
Team Insights
Pollingnote
Action dashboard
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous inputnotenote
Independent votingnote
Async mode
Agile Estimationsnote
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asananote
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHubnote
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notionnote
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks
MCP servernote

Mural — pros

  • + Mature facilitation toolkit — Outline, Timer, Voting, Private Mode — refined over 10+ years
  • + Anonymous where it counts: votes hide who voted, and Private Mode can keep sticky authors hidden even after reveal
  • + Best-in-class enterprise posture: SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, SSO/SAML, SCIM, NA/EU/APAC residency
  • + Two-way Jira and Azure DevOps sync via interactive work-item cards turns sticky notes into tracked issues
  • + Polished UX, especially for facilitators running synchronous workshops

Mural — cons

  • Per-seat pricing: a 24-person org pays ~$240/mo on the Team+ tier (annual), well above retro-native tools at that headcount
  • No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal team-pulse
  • No recurring retros, action carryover or cross-team rollup — facilitators rebuild structure each sprint
  • AI (clustering, summary, tone Classify) helps inside a session but doesn't track trends across retros
  • SSO/SAML needs the $17.99/user/mo Business tier; SCIM, audit logs and data residency are Enterprise-only

RetroFlow — pros

  • + Genuinely free with no paid tiers, no paywalled features and no account required to join a board
  • + Anonymous feedback — participants contribute with no signup, email or PII collected
  • + Three-step setup — pick a template, share the link, run the retro; participants join in one click and notes sync live
  • + Eleven ready-made formats, up from seven — Sailboat, DAKI, Plus/Delta and Three Little Pigs are all new since the last review
  • + <strong>PDF and Excel export</strong> of the finished board — new this quarter, and the only route to getting your data out
  • + Light personalisation — custom column names, 2-6 columns, colour palettes and per-note emoji, with reusable saved layouts

RetroFlow — cons

  • No timer or phase controls — three separate timer requests sit unshipped on the vendor's own public roadmap, and there is no countdown anywhere in the app
  • No grouping of similar cards and no carry-over of previous action items — both still <em>Planned</em> on the roadmap
  • No integrations at all — nothing pushes to Jira, Linear, Slack or Teams, and there is no public API, webhooks or AI
  • No health checks, recurring retros, mood tracking or cross-team reporting
  • No enterprise security or compliance — no SOC 2, SSO, SCIM or audit logs, no GDPR statement in the privacy policy, and boards are private only by unguessable URL since there are no accounts
  • Built and run by a solo developer (Prashant Meena) with no support team or SLA — support routes to a personal WhatsApp number and LinkedIn DMs, and the free-tier backend still shows a ~10s cold start plus first-load errors

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.