Retrospective Tools

RetroFlow vs TeamRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

RetroFlow logo

RetroFlow

3.4

Your team's favourite way to retro

RetroFlow is a free, no-signup retrospective board built by solo developer Prashant Meena, with colourful boards, real-time collaboration, 11 ready-made templates, anonymous feedback, dot voting, action items and PDF/Excel export. Participants join a shared link in one click with no account; the whole product is free with no paid tiers or locked features.

Full review →
TeamRetro logo

TeamRetro

8.3

Retrospectives, health checks and agile estimations in one suite

TeamRetro pairs structured retrospectives with longitudinal team health checks and planning-poker estimations, aimed at agile organisations running multiple teams under a coach or programme.

Full review →

Summary

RetroFlow scores 3.4 overall and is best for small or ad-hoc teams who want a genuinely free, zero-friction retro board they can share with one link — no signup, no payment and no setup, accepting that there is no timer, no integrations, no AI and no enterprise controls. It offers a free tier.

TeamRetro scores 8.3 overall and is best for agile coaches and engineering managers running ongoing health-check programmes alongside sprint retros. It offers paid plans from $20.83/mo billed annually ($25/mo billed monthly) — Single Team, 1 team, 25 members.

RetroFlow leads on value. TeamRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, TeamRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

RetroFlow
Ease of Use8.0
Retro Toolkit4.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor4.5
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations0.0
Open Platform1.0
Enterprise-grade1.0
TeamRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit9.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights8.0
Integrations9.0
Open Platform9.0
Enterprise-grade8.5
DetailRetroFlowTeamRetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallAny
Free tierYesNo
Free limitEverything is free — all 11 templates, custom boards, saved layouts, real-time collaboration, anonymous feedback, dot voting, action items and PDF/Excel export, with no account required to join a boardNo free plan — 30-day trial, no credit card required
Starting priceFree$20.83/mo billed annually ($25/mo billed monthly) — Single Team, 1 team, 25 members
Est. 3 teams × 8 peopleFree (no paid tier)$50/mo billed annually ($60/mo billed monthly) — Small Organization plan, a 3-team bundle with unlimited members
EnterpriseNoYes
Founded2017
HQAustralia
Data residencyUnited States · European Union
LanguagesEnglish only29 (English, Arabic, Bengali, …)
Export formatsPDF · ExcelExcel · CSV · PDF · Markdown · Email · Image
Features765
Integrations015

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityRetroFlowTeamRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action trackingnote
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous inputnote
Independent votingnote
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPR
SSO / SAML
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001note
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooks
MCP server

RetroFlow — pros

  • + Genuinely free with no paid tiers, no paywalled features and no account required to join a board
  • + Anonymous feedback — participants contribute with no signup, email or PII collected
  • + Three-step setup — pick a template, share the link, run the retro; participants join in one click and notes sync live
  • + Eleven ready-made formats, up from seven — Sailboat, DAKI, Plus/Delta and Three Little Pigs are all new since the last review
  • + <strong>PDF and Excel export</strong> of the finished board — new this quarter, and the only route to getting your data out
  • + Light personalisation — custom column names, 2-6 columns, colour palettes and per-note emoji, with reusable saved layouts

RetroFlow — cons

  • No timer or phase controls — three separate timer requests sit unshipped on the vendor's own public roadmap, and there is no countdown anywhere in the app
  • No grouping of similar cards and no carry-over of previous action items — both still <em>Planned</em> on the roadmap
  • No integrations at all — nothing pushes to Jira, Linear, Slack or Teams, and there is no public API, webhooks or AI
  • No health checks, recurring retros, mood tracking or cross-team reporting
  • No enterprise security or compliance — no SOC 2, SSO, SCIM or audit logs, no GDPR statement in the privacy policy, and boards are private only by unguessable URL since there are no accounts
  • Built and run by a solo developer (Prashant Meena) with no support team or SLA — support routes to a personal WhatsApp number and LinkedIn DMs, and the free-tier backend still shows a ~10s cold start plus first-load errors

TeamRetro — pros

  • + Health checks and maturity models as a first-class module — custom dimensions, radar charts, trends across sprints
  • + Three modules on one subscription: retrospectives, health checks, planning-poker estimation
  • + SAML SSO, RBAC and US-or-EU hosting on <em>every</em> plan, not just Enterprise
  • + GA MCP server plus team-level API keys and HMAC-signed webhooks, included on all plans
  • + 15 native integrations: Jira, Azure DevOps, GitHub, GitLab, Linear, Confluence, Slack, Teams and more

TeamRetro — cons

  • No free tier — 30-day trial, then a paid plan
  • Audit logs, SCIM, IP allowlisting and guest/observer roles are Enterprise-only
  • Cross-team insights, reports and programs (team-of-teams) require Enterprise
  • ISO 27001 is inherited from AWS, not held by TeamRetro
  • Hosting is US or EU only — no APAC region despite the Australian HQ

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.