Kollabe
5.6Agile meetings made easy — retros, standups and planning poker
Kollabe began life as a planning poker tool and has more recently extended into retrospectives — the estimation side remains the centre of gravity, with retros and standups added as adjacent rituals rather than the headline product. It now bundles 600+ icebreakers, anonymous voting, AI-generated summaries and sync-back to Jira, GitHub, Linear and Azure DevOps in a flat <strong>per-space</strong> workspace, though the retro experience is younger and less battle-tested than its estimation roots.
Full review →
RetroFlow
3.7Your team's favourite way to retro
RetroFlow is a free, no-signup retrospective board built by solo developer Prashant Meena, with colourful boards, real-time collaboration, 7 ready-made templates, anonymous feedback, dot voting and action items. Participants join a shared link in one click with no account; the whole product is free with no paid tiers or locked features.
Full review →Summary
Kollabe scores 5.6 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams that want retros, standups and planning poker in one clean tool — without per-seat pricing. It offers a free tier.
RetroFlow scores 3.7 overall and is best for small or ad-hoc teams who want a genuinely free, zero-friction retro board they can share with one link — no signup, no payment and no setup, accepting that there are no integrations, AI or enterprise controls. It offers a free tier.
Kollabe leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade. RetroFlow leads on value.
Across our seven scoring dimensions, Kollabe edges ahead with an overall score of 5.6. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.
Scores compared
| Detail | Kollabe | RetroFlow |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Retrospectives | Retrospectives |
| Team size | Small | Small |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Free limit | 10 members per room, ~4 meetings/month, 7-day history | Everything is free — all 7 templates, real-time collaboration, anonymous feedback, dot voting and action items, with no account required to join a board |
| Starting price | $29/mo | Free |
| Est. 3 teams × 8 people | $87/mo | Free (no paid tier) |
| Enterprise | Yes | No |
| Founded | 2023 | — |
| HQ | Sydney, Australia | — |
| Data residency | — | — |
| Languages | English only | English only |
| Features | 25 | 7 |
| Integrations | 4 | 0 |
Feature & integration comparison
Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.
| Capability | Kollabe | RetroFlow |
|---|---|---|
| Features | ||
| AI Summaries | ✓ | — |
| AI grouping/clustering | — | — |
| AI action items | — | — |
| Action tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Team Insights | — | — |
| Polling | ✓ | — |
| Action dashboard | — | — |
| Custom templates | ✓ | ✓note |
| Anonymous input | ✓ | ✓note |
| Independent voting | — | ✓ |
| Async mode | ✓ | — |
| Agile Estimations | ✓ | — |
| Health Checks | — | — |
| Team Kudos | — | — |
| Whiteboard | — | — |
| Integrations | ||
| Asana | — | — |
| Azure DevOps | ✓ | — |
| Basecamp | — | — |
| ClickUp | — | — |
| Confluence | — | — |
| GitHub | ✓ | — |
| GitLab | — | — |
| Jira | ✓ | — |
| Linear | ✓ | — |
| Microsoft Teams | — | — |
| Monday.com | — | — |
| Notion | — | — |
| Shortcut | — | — |
| Slack | — | — |
| Trello | — | — |
| Security & Privacy | ||
| SOC 2 | — | — |
| GDPR | — | — |
| SSO / SAML | ✓note | — |
| SCIM provisioning | — | — |
| ISO 27001 | — | — |
| On-premises | — | — |
| Public API | ✓note | — |
| Webhooks | — | — |
Kollabe — pros
- + Flat per-space pricing — unlimited team members on Premium ($29/mo)
- + Bundles retros, standups, planning poker and icebreakers in one tool
- + No-signup join links lower friction for ad-hoc participants
- + Direct sync-back to Jira, GitHub, Linear and Azure DevOps
- + Public API and MCP server access on Premium
Kollabe — cons
- − No Slack or Microsoft Teams integration
- − No SOC 2 / no advertised GDPR posture — weak for enterprise procurement
- − No dedicated health-check, team-radar or longitudinal pulse feature
- − Solo-founder operation; SSO/SAML and SLA gated behind Enterprise contact-sales
- − Free tier capped at ~4 meetings/month with 7-day history
RetroFlow — pros
- + Genuinely free with no paid tiers, no paywalled features and no account required to join a board
- + Anonymous feedback — participants contribute with no signup, email or PII collected
- + Three-step setup — pick a template, share the link, run the retro; participants join with one click
- + Seven ready-made retrospective formats covering the common reflection patterns
- + Real-time collaboration with live notes, dot voting and shared action items
- + Light personalisation — custom column names, 2-6 columns, 7 colour palettes and 48 emojis
RetroFlow — cons
- − No integrations at all — nothing pushes to Jira, Linear, Slack, Teams or any agile-stack tool
- − No AI features (clustering, summary, action extraction or sentiment)
- − No health checks, recurring retros, mood tracking or cross-team reporting
- − No enterprise security or compliance — no SOC 2, SSO, SCIM or audit logs; the privacy policy confirms only HTTPS and Vercel hosting with Google Analytics/PostHog analytics
- − Built and run by a solo developer (Prashant Meena) with no support team or SLA — fine for ad-hoc use, but unsuitable for enterprise procurement
- − Boards are private only by unguessable URL — there are no accounts, so no real access control, invite management or board history