Retrospective Tools

Reetro vs TeamRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Reetro logo

Reetro

6.4

Fun, easy and AI-powered online retrospectives

Reetro is a lightweight retrospective tool with a generous free tier and AI-powered paid tiers covering meeting summaries, sentiment analysis, AI card grouping, monthly reports, customizable health checks and an action tracker. ISO 27001 is held at the vendor level; SOC 2 is described as compliance on SOC 2-certified infrastructure rather than a published Reetro-level Type 2 audit.

Full review →
TeamRetro logo

TeamRetro

8.4

Retrospectives, health checks and agile estimations in one suite

TeamRetro pairs structured retrospectives with longitudinal team health checks and planning-poker estimations, aimed at agile organisations running multiple teams under a coach or programme.

Full review →

Summary

Reetro scores 6.4 overall and is best for small to mid-sized agile teams who want a low-cost, easy retro board with AI summaries, customizable health checks and Jira/Azure DevOps export — with a flat-rate org-wide tier if you outgrow per-team pricing. It offers a free tier.

TeamRetro scores 8.4 overall and is best for agile coaches and engineering managers running ongoing health-check programmes alongside sprint retros. It offers paid plans from $25/mo.

Reetro leads on value. TeamRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, TeamRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Reetro
Ease of Use 7.5
Retro Toolkit 6.0
Value 9.0
Fun Factor 5.5
AI & Insights 6.0
Integrations 5.0
Enterprise-grade 6.0
TeamRetro
Ease of Use 9.0
Retro Toolkit 9.0
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 6.0
AI & Insights 8.0
Integrations 9.0
Enterprise-grade 9.5
Detail Reetro TeamRetro
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Small Any
Free tier Yes No
Free limit 3 teams, 9 members per team, 10 active boards/month, 4 columns, 1 health check/month 30-day free trial, no credit card required
Starting price $39/team/mo ($32/team/mo annual); flat $49/mo org-wide on Pro Unlimited $25/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people Free (within free tier) $50/mo billed annually
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2019 2017
HQ Copenhagen, Denmark Australia
Data residency United States · European Union
Languages English only 30 (English, Arabic, Bengali, …)
Features 41 63
Integrations 7 15

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Reetro TeamRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering note
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates note
Anonymous input note
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos note
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps note
Basecamp
ClickUp note
Confluence note
GitHub
GitLab
Jira note
Linear
Microsoft Teams note
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack note
Trello note
Security & Privacy
SOC 2 note
GDPR
SSO / SAML note
SCIM provisioning note
ISO 27001 note
On-premises note
Public API note
Webhooks

Reetro — pros

  • + Generous free tier with no credit card required — 3 teams, 9 members covers a 24-person org
  • + Flat-rate Pro Unlimited at $49/mo covers the whole org — strong value if you outgrow per-team pricing
  • + AI summaries, sentiment analysis, AI card grouping and monthly reports included on paid
  • + Customizable team health checks, polls and a happiness index
  • + ISO 27001 certified at the vendor level, plus audit logs and a public trust center; on-premises available on the Business tier

Reetro — cons

  • Free plan capped at 3 teams, 9 members, 10 boards/month and 4 columns, with anonymity now paid-only
  • Per-team Pro pricing rose to $39/team/mo ($32 annual); the cheapest path for scale is the flat Pro Unlimited
  • Voting is essentially thumbs up/down — no vote-on-ideas-in-groups
  • No published Reetro-level SOC 2 Type 2 audit (compliance rests on SOC 2-certified infrastructure)
  • No public changelog or release notes — hard to verify what's shipped recently from the outside
  • No planning poker, whiteboard, presentation mode, native mobile app, or GitHub/Linear integrations

TeamRetro — pros

  • + Health checks with custom models, longitudinal tracking and cross-team reporting
  • + Three modules in one suite (retros, health checks, planning poker)
  • + Complete enterprise stack: SAML SSO, SCIM and audit logs, SOC 2 Type 2 held directly, US/EU data residency
  • + AI grouping, template suggestions, action items and sentiment built in
  • + Broad agile-tool integrations including Jira, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence

TeamRetro — cons

  • No free tier — 30-day trial only, then a paid plan is required
  • SCIM provisioning and the public API are gated to the Enterprise tier
  • ISO 27001 is inherited via AWS, not held directly
  • Data residency limited to US and EU (no APAC region)
← All comparisons