Retrospective Tools

Kollabe vs Reetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Kollabe logo

Kollabe

5.5

Agile meetings made easy — retros, standups and planning poker

Kollabe began life as a planning poker tool and has extended into retrospectives and standups — the estimation side remains the centre of gravity, with retros and standups added as adjacent rituals rather than the headline product. It bundles icebreakers, anonymous input, AI summaries and sync-back to Jira, GitHub, Linear and Azure DevOps in a flat per-space workspace. Recent additions include a Slack-based async standup flow, a public API and MCP server, and cross-ritual weekly reporting — though the retro module is still younger and less battle-tested than its estimation roots.

Full review →
Reetro logo

Reetro

5.9

Fun, easy and AI-powered online retrospectives

Reetro is a lightweight retrospective tool with a generous free tier and AI-powered paid tiers covering meeting summaries, sentiment analysis, AI card grouping, monthly reports, customizable health checks and an action tracker. ISO 27001 is held at the vendor level; SOC 2 is described as compliance on SOC 2-certified infrastructure rather than a published Reetro-level Type 2 audit.

Full review →

Summary

Kollabe scores 5.5 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams that want retros, standups and planning poker in one clean tool — without per-seat pricing. It offers a free tier.

Reetro scores 5.9 overall and is best for small to mid-sized agile teams who want a low-cost, easy retro board with AI summaries, customizable health checks and Jira/Azure DevOps export — with a flat-rate org-wide tier if you outgrow per-team pricing. It offers a free tier.

Kollabe leads on ease of use and open platform. Reetro leads on retro toolkit, value, AI & insights and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Reetro edges ahead with an overall score of 5.9. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Kollabe
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit5.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights4.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform5.0
Enterprise-grade2.0
Reetro
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit6.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights6.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform2.0
Enterprise-grade6.0
DetailKollabeReetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limit10 members per room, limited meetings/month, 7-day history3 teams, 9 members per team, 10 active boards per team, 4 columns, 1 health check/month
Starting price$29/mo$10/team/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$87/mo (3 team spaces × $29 Premium; each space allows unlimited members)Free (within free tier)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20232019
HQSydney, AustraliaCopenhagen, Denmark
Data residency
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsConfluence · CSVCSV · Word · Jira · Confluence
Features2639
Integrations56

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityKollabeReetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clusteringnote
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous inputnote
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudosnote
Whiteboardnote
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluencenote
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknotenote
Trellonote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premisesnote
Public APInote
Webhooks
MCP servernote

Kollabe — pros

  • + Flat per-space pricing — unlimited team members on Premium ($29/mo)
  • + Bundles retros, standups, planning poker and icebreakers in one tool
  • + No-signup join links lower friction for ad-hoc participants
  • + Direct sync-back to Jira, GitHub, Linear and Azure DevOps
  • + Public API and MCP server access on Premium

Kollabe — cons

  • Slack integration is standup-only (no retro summaries/actions to Slack); no Microsoft Teams yet
  • No SOC 2 / no advertised GDPR posture — weak for enterprise procurement
  • No dedicated health-check, team-radar or longitudinal pulse feature
  • Solo-founder operation; SSO/SAML and SLA gated behind Enterprise contact-sales
  • Free tier caps meetings/month with 7-day history

Reetro — pros

  • + Generous free tier with no credit card required — 3 teams, 9 members covers a 24-person org
  • + Flat-rate Pro Unlimited at $49/mo covers the whole org — strong value if you outgrow per-team pricing
  • + AI summaries, sentiment analysis, AI card grouping and monthly reports included on paid
  • + Customizable team health checks, polls and a happiness index
  • + ISO 27001 certified at the vendor level, plus audit logs and a public trust center; on-premises available on the Pro Unlimited tier

Reetro — cons

  • Free plan capped at 3 teams, 9 members, 10 active boards per team and 4 columns, with anonymity now paid-only
  • Pro Unlimited's own marketing is self-contradictory — the FAQ calls it a flat org-wide $49/mo while the plan card says per-team with a 180-member cap
  • Voting is essentially thumbs up/down — no vote-on-ideas-in-groups
  • No published Reetro-level SOC 2 Type 2 audit (compliance rests on SOC 2-certified infrastructure)
  • No public changelog or release notes — hard to verify what's shipped recently from the outside
  • No planning poker, presentation mode, native mobile app, or GitHub/Linear integrations

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.