Retrospective Tools

Ludi vs TeleRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Ludi logo

Ludi

5.7

Playful collaborative whiteboard for agile teams

Ludi (formerly Metro Retro, rebranded August 2025) is a visual agile collaboration whiteboard with 100+ templates spanning retros, planning poker, icebreakers and futurespectives. Its signature illustrated canvas and gadgets make ceremonies feel engaging, and a first AI feature — sticky-note clustering — shipped February 2026.

Full review →
TeleRetro logo

TeleRetro

6.7

Agile retros you'll love

TeleRetro is a remote-first retrospective tool built around team engagement — animated GIF reactions, icebreaker games, music, planning poker and a clean facilitation flow. It now pairs retros with a Pulse Survey module for tracking team health between sessions, aimed at small to mid-size agile teams who want retros that feel lively rather than mechanical.

Full review →

Summary

Ludi scores 5.7 overall and is best for agile teams who want retros, planning and workshops to feel visual and fun, with a solid Jira-backed delivery loop. It offers paid plans from $4/user/mo billed annually.

TeleRetro scores 6.7 overall and is best for remote and hybrid agile teams who prioritise engagement and fun alongside a solid retrospective facilitation workflow. It offers a free tier.

Ludi leads on fun factor. TeleRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, TeleRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 6.7. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Ludi
Ease of Use 8.5
Retro Toolkit 6.0
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 9.0
AI & Insights 2.0
Integrations 3.0
Enterprise-grade 3.5
TeleRetro
Ease of Use 9.0
Retro Toolkit 8.0
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 8.0
AI & Insights 4.0
Integrations 6.0
Enterprise-grade 4.0
Detail Ludi TeleRetro
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Small Small
Free tier No Yes
Free limit 30-day free trial; boards become read-only when the trial expires 1 team, 3 retros, 14-day retro access, 1 pulse survey, limited AI Retro Bot access
Starting price $4/user/mo billed annually £26/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $96/mo billed annually £72/mo (~$91/mo) on the Business plan (3 teams)
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2020 2020
HQ UK UK
Data residency European Union
Languages English only 14 (English, German, Spanish, …)
Features 33 38
Integrations 1 7

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Ludi TeleRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering note
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling note
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input note
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks note
Team Kudos note
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps note
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub note
GitLab
Jira note
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion note
Shortcut
Slack
Trello note
Security & Privacy
SOC 2 note
GDPR
SSO / SAML note note
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API note
Webhooks

Ludi — pros

  • + Genuinely delightful, illustrated UI that energises in-person and remote retros
  • + Broad template library (100+) covering retros, icebreakers, planning poker, futurespectives, planning and estimation
  • + Solid two-way Jira integration: backlog refinement, estimation and issue creation in-board
  • + Facilitator controls, private writing mode and shareable team spaces
  • + First AI feature shipped Feb 2026 — Sort into Topics auto-groups stickies into labelled topics
  • + EU-hosted (Amsterdam) and GDPR-aligned (SOC 2 / ISO 27001 sit at the Digital Ocean infrastructure layer, not Ludi)

Ludi — cons

  • No async retro mode, no recurring or scheduled retros
  • No team health check or longitudinal pulse product; mood/radar work via whiteboard templates only
  • Integrations limited to Jira — no Slack, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • AI limited to one clustering feature — no summaries, action-item extraction, sentiment or coaching
  • No ongoing free plan; expired trials become read-only
  • SSO gated to a paid/Enterprise plan; no SCIM or audit logs advertised

TeleRetro — pros

  • + Standout engagement features — GIF reactions, music and icebreaker games make retros genuinely enjoyable
  • + Clean, low-friction facilitation flow with timer, voting, grouping and action items in one place
  • + Pulse Surveys now track team health between retros, with a cross-team dashboard on the Business plan
  • + Async mode and action carry-over keep distributed teams aligned between sprints
  • + AI Retro Bot spins up a custom retro format from any topic in seconds

TeleRetro — cons

  • AI is limited to format and icebreaker generation — no board summary, clustering, action extraction or sentiment
  • Native integrations stop at Jira, Slack and Teams; Trello, GitHub and Azure DevOps run through Zapier
  • No SCIM, audit logs or SOC 2; SSO (Okta/Azure AD) is Enterprise-plan only
  • Health/pulse module is lighter than dedicated health-check tools — no team radars or psych-safety models
  • Annual-only discount and per-team pricing add up beyond a handful of teams
← All comparisons