Retrospective Tools

FigJam vs TeleRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

FigJam logo

FigJam

6.9

Figma's whiteboard with AI-assisted clustering, voting and a free tier that includes meaningful AI credits

FigJam is the whiteboard product inside Figma — sticky notes, voting, timer, audio, music, expressive cursor stamps, an AI co-pilot that clusters and summarises sticky notes, and dozens of community retro templates. Sits inside the Figma platform so design and product teams already living there get retros without buying a second tool, with Figma's strong SSO/SCIM and SOC 2 enterprise posture on Org+/Enterprise plans.

Full review →
TeleRetro logo

TeleRetro

6.7

Agile retros you'll love

TeleRetro is a remote-first retrospective tool built around team engagement — animated GIF reactions, icebreaker games, music, planning poker and a clean facilitation flow. It now pairs retros with a Pulse Survey module for tracking team health between sessions, aimed at small to mid-size agile teams who want retros that feel lively rather than mechanical.

Full review →

Summary

FigJam scores 6.9 overall and is best for design and product teams already on Figma who want retros on the same platform as their design files, with playful engagement and AI clustering. It offers a free tier.

TeleRetro scores 6.7 overall and is best for remote and hybrid agile teams who prioritise engagement and fun alongside a solid retrospective facilitation workflow. It offers a free tier.

FigJam leads on fun factor, AI & insights and enterprise-grade. TeleRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit and value.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, FigJam edges ahead with an overall score of 6.9. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

FigJam
Ease of Use 7.0
Retro Toolkit 4.5
Value 7.0
Fun Factor 9.0
AI & Insights 5.0
Integrations 6.0
Enterprise-grade 9.5
TeleRetro
Ease of Use 9.0
Retro Toolkit 8.0
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 8.0
AI & Insights 4.0
Integrations 6.0
Enterprise-grade 4.0
Detail FigJam TeleRetro
Category Whiteboard Retrospectives
Team size Mid-market Small
Free tier Yes Yes
Free limit Starter: 3 FigJam boards per team (unlimited personal drafts), 150 AI credits/day (500/month), community templates 1 team, 3 retros, 14-day retro access, 1 pulse survey, limited AI Retro Bot access
Starting price $3/user/mo (Collab seat) £26/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people ~$72/mo (24 Collab seats × $3, annual) — more if hosts need Full seats £72/mo (~$91/mo) on the Business plan (3 teams)
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2012 2020
HQ San Francisco, US UK
Data residency United States
Languages English only 14 (English, German, Spanish, …)
Features 38 38
Integrations 8 7

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability FigJam TeleRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items note
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations note
Health Checks note
Team Kudos note
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps note
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub note
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com note
Notion note note
Shortcut
Slack
Trello note
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAML note note
SCIM provisioning note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API note
Webhooks

FigJam — pros

  • + Cheap $3/user/mo Collab seat unlocks unlimited boards without a full Figma editor seat
  • + Free tier includes real AI credits (150/day, 500/month) and the full retro toolkit
  • + Same login and platform as Figma — zero friction for design-led teams
  • + Playful, engaging UX (audio, music, stamps, expressive cursors) lifts retro fun factor
  • + Strong enterprise posture inherited from Figma: SAML, SCIM, SOC 2, ISO 27001

FigJam — cons

  • No native action-item tracking, recurring retros or health checks
  • Anonymous mode is weak — no built-in 'private until reveal' equivalent
  • No Microsoft Teams or Azure DevOps integration
  • Free Starter caps teams at 3 FigJam boards — a recurring retro practice outgrows it fast
  • Built primarily for designers; agile coaches sometimes find the canvas paradigm fiddly for structured retros

TeleRetro — pros

  • + Standout engagement features — GIF reactions, music and icebreaker games make retros genuinely enjoyable
  • + Clean, low-friction facilitation flow with timer, voting, grouping and action items in one place
  • + Pulse Surveys now track team health between retros, with a cross-team dashboard on the Business plan
  • + Async mode and action carry-over keep distributed teams aligned between sprints
  • + AI Retro Bot spins up a custom retro format from any topic in seconds

TeleRetro — cons

  • AI is limited to format and icebreaker generation — no board summary, clustering, action extraction or sentiment
  • Native integrations stop at Jira, Slack and Teams; Trello, GitHub and Azure DevOps run through Zapier
  • No SCIM, audit logs or SOC 2; SSO (Okta/Azure AD) is Enterprise-plan only
  • Health/pulse module is lighter than dedicated health-check tools — no team radars or psych-safety models
  • Annual-only discount and per-team pricing add up beyond a handful of teams
← All comparisons