Retrospective Tools

Lucidspark vs Ludi

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Lucidspark logo

Lucidspark

6.4

Lucid Software's whiteboard with the Lucid AI assistant, breakout boards and tight Lucidchart integration

Lucidspark is the whiteboard product from Lucid Software (makers of Lucidchart) — an infinite canvas with sticky notes, voting, timer, breakout boards, the Lucid AI conversational assistant (prompt-to-board, clustering, summaries), and bidirectional sync with Lucidchart for diagrams. Strong enterprise posture inherited from Lucid: SSO/SAML, SCIM, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001/27701, FedRAMP, GDPR, and US/EU/AU data residency.

Full review →
Ludi logo

Ludi

5.7

Playful collaborative whiteboard for agile teams

Ludi (formerly Metro Retro, rebranded August 2025) is a visual agile collaboration whiteboard with 100+ templates spanning retros, planning poker, icebreakers and futurespectives. Its signature illustrated canvas and gadgets make ceremonies feel engaging, and a first AI feature — sticky-note clustering — shipped February 2026.

Full review →

Summary

Lucidspark scores 6.4 overall and is best for engineering and PM teams already on Lucidchart who want sticky-note retros and brainstorming on the same platform — and whose security review favours a SOC 2 / ISO 27001 vendor. It offers a free tier.

Ludi scores 5.7 overall and is best for agile teams who want retros, planning and workshops to feel visual and fun, with a solid Jira-backed delivery loop. It offers paid plans from $4/user/mo billed annually.

Lucidspark leads on AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade. Ludi leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value and fun factor.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Lucidspark edges ahead with an overall score of 6.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Lucidspark
Ease of Use 7.0
Retro Toolkit 4.5
Value 5.0
Fun Factor 6.0
AI & Insights 6.0
Integrations 7.0
Enterprise-grade 9.0
Ludi
Ease of Use 8.5
Retro Toolkit 6.0
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 9.0
AI & Insights 2.0
Integrations 3.0
Enterprise-grade 3.5
Detail Lucidspark Ludi
Category Whiteboard Retrospectives
Team size Mid-market Small
Free tier Yes No
Free limit 3 editable boards, 100 shapes per board, basic templates, 1 AI sticky-note generation/day 30-day free trial; boards become read-only when the trial expires
Starting price $7.95/user/mo $4/user/mo billed annually
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $216/mo (Team plan, 24 users at $9/user) $96/mo billed annually
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2010 2020
HQ South Jordan, US UK
Data residency United States · European Union · Australia European Union
Languages 10 (English, Spanish, German, …) English only
Features 36 33
Integrations 7 1

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Lucidspark Ludi
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering note
AI action items
Action tracking note
Team Insights
Polling note
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input note
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations note
Health Checks
Team Kudos note
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira note
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion note
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2 note
GDPR
SSO / SAML note note
SCIM provisioning note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks

Lucidspark — pros

  • + Tight integration with Lucidchart — switch between diagram and whiteboard on the same canvas
  • + Breakout Boards let you split a workshop or retro into parallel rooms
  • + Strong enterprise posture: SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001/27701, FedRAMP, GDPR, SSO/SAML, SCIM, US/EU/AU data residency
  • + Generous integration set: Jira, Slack, Teams, Confluence, Azure DevOps, Asana
  • + Free tier exists and is enough to evaluate the tool

Lucidspark — cons

  • No native anonymous voting — names always visible on stickies
  • No health checks, recurring retros, action carryover or cross-team rollup
  • AI is general brainstorming/clustering, not retro-aware — no sentiment, action-item extraction or trend insight across retros
  • Free tier is restrictive: 3 boards and 100 shapes/board limits real use beyond evaluation
  • Brand is best known for diagramming; retro template depth trails Miro and Mural

Ludi — pros

  • + Genuinely delightful, illustrated UI that energises in-person and remote retros
  • + Broad template library (100+) covering retros, icebreakers, planning poker, futurespectives, planning and estimation
  • + Solid two-way Jira integration: backlog refinement, estimation and issue creation in-board
  • + Facilitator controls, private writing mode and shareable team spaces
  • + First AI feature shipped Feb 2026 — Sort into Topics auto-groups stickies into labelled topics
  • + EU-hosted (Amsterdam) and GDPR-aligned (SOC 2 / ISO 27001 sit at the Digital Ocean infrastructure layer, not Ludi)

Ludi — cons

  • No async retro mode, no recurring or scheduled retros
  • No team health check or longitudinal pulse product; mood/radar work via whiteboard templates only
  • Integrations limited to Jira — no Slack, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • AI limited to one clustering feature — no summaries, action-item extraction, sentiment or coaching
  • No ongoing free plan; expired trials become read-only
  • SSO gated to a paid/Enterprise plan; no SCIM or audit logs advertised
← All comparisons