Retrospective Tools

Lucidspark vs Miro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Lucidspark logo

Lucidspark

6.4

Lucid Software's whiteboard with the Lucid AI assistant and tight Lucidchart integration — voting, timers and facilitator tools start at the Team tier

Lucidspark is the whiteboard product from Lucid Software (makers of Lucidchart) — an infinite canvas with sticky notes, private-mode brainstorming, anonymous voting sessions, timers, the Lucid AI assistant (prompt-to-board, magic sort, board summaries) and bidirectional sync with Lucidchart for diagrams. Free and Individual get static dot voting only; the timer, private voting and facilitator tools start at the Team tier, and Breakout Boards plus the Lucid Cards sync to Jira/Azure DevOps/monday.com are Enterprise-only. Strong enterprise posture inherited from Lucid: SSO/SAML, SCIM, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001/27701/42001, FedRAMP Moderate, IRAP PROTECTED, GDPR, and US/EU/AU data residency.

Full review →
Miro logo

Miro

7.1

Innovation Workspace where retros happen on the same canvas as discovery and planning

Miro is the dominant online whiteboard, now sold as an AI Innovation Workspace. It pairs an infinite canvas with a 7,000+ template library (300+ retro formats among them), AI clustering by sentiment/keyword/author, Engage live polls and word clouds (included with Business since June 2026), Blueprints for reusable multi-board workflows, real-time and async collaboration, and a 250+ app marketplace with first-party two-way card sync to Jira, Azure DevOps, Asana, Linear and ClickUp. An official MCP server runs on every plan under per-tier daily call quotas.

Full review →

Summary

Lucidspark scores 6.4 overall and is best for engineering and PM teams already on Lucidchart who want sticky-note retros and brainstorming on the same platform — and whose security review favours a SOC 2 / ISO 27001 vendor. It offers a free tier.

Miro scores 7.1 overall and is best for large product, design and engineering orgs that already run discovery, planning and retros on one canvas and want AI clustering plus deep Jira/Azure DevOps/Asana sync. It offers a free tier.

Lucidspark leads on open platform. Miro leads on fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Miro edges ahead with an overall score of 7.1. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Lucidspark
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value5.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights6.0
Integrations6.5
Open Platform7.0
Enterprise-grade9.0
Miro
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value5.0
Fun Factor7.5
AI & Insights7.0
Integrations9.0
Open Platform6.5
Enterprise-grade9.5
DetailLucidsparkMiro
CategoryWhiteboardWhiteboard
Team sizeMid-marketEnterprise
Free tierYesYes
Free limit3 editable boards, unlimited shapes per board, basic Visual Activities, presentation mode, Lucid AI and static dot voting — no timer, private voting or facilitator tools3 editable boards, limited AI credits, 100 MCP calls/day, full 7,000+ template library, 250+ app marketplace; no private boards, SSO, guests, Blueprints or two-way integrations
Starting price$9/user/mo (Individual, billed annually)$8/user/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$240/mo (Team plan, 24 users at $10/user billed annually)$192/mo billed annually (Starter, 24 seats)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20102011
HQSouth Jordan, USAmsterdam, NL
Data residencyUnited States · European Union · AustraliaUnited States · European Union · Australia · JP
Languages12 (English, German, Spanish, …)8 (English, Spanish, German, …)
Export formatsImage · PDF · CSV · JSONImage · PDF · CSV
Features3940
Integrations812

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityLucidsparkMiro
Features
Custom templates✓✓
Anonymous input✓note✓note
Health Checks——
Action tracking✓note✓note
Async mode✓✓
Whiteboard✓✓
Independent voting✓note✓
Polling✓✓note
Icebreaker games——
Agile Estimations✓note✓note
Team Kudos——
AI grouping/clustering✓✓
AI action items—✓note
AI Summaries✓✓
Team Insights——
In-meeting AI assistant✓note✓note
Action dashboard——
Integrations
Asana✓note✓note
Azure DevOps✓note✓note
Basecamp——
ClickUp—✓note
Confluence✓note✓
GitHub—✓note
GitLab——
Jira✓note✓note
Linear—✓note
Microsoft Teams✓✓
Monday.com✓note✓note
Notion✓note✓note
Shortcut——
Slack✓✓
Trello—✓note
Security & Privacy
SOC 2✓✓
GDPR✓✓
SSO / SAML✓note✓note
SCIM provisioning✓note✓note
ISO 27001✓✓
On-premises——
Public API✓note✓
Webhooks——
MCP server✓note✓note

Lucidspark — pros

  • + Tight integration with Lucidchart — switch between diagram and whiteboard on the same canvas
  • + <em>Private mode</em> works on every plan, free included: it hides sticky note contents and authors, and the facilitator can keep authors hidden permanently
  • + Strong enterprise posture: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001/27701/42001, FedRAMP Moderate, IRAP PROTECTED, PCI DSS, GDPR, SSO/SAML, SCIM, US/EU/AU data residency
  • + Official Lucid MCP server is GA on every plan and shipping monthly — search boards, summarise them, generate synced Jira cards from Claude or ChatGPT
  • + Lucid AI is included on every tier today, free plan included

Lucidspark — cons

  • − Timer, private voting and facilitator tools start at the $10/user Team tier — Free and Individual get static dot voting and nothing else facilitator-shaped
  • − Breakout Boards and the Lucid Cards sync to Jira, Azure DevOps and monday.com are Enterprise-only; audit logs need the paid Enterprise Shield add-on on top of Enterprise
  • − No health checks, recurring retros, action carryover or cross-team rollup
  • − AI is general brainstorming/summarising, not retro-aware — no sentiment, action-item extraction or trend insight across retros
  • − Retro template depth trails Miro and Mural; the REST API needs a Team or Enterprise account and there are no outbound webhooks

Miro — pros

  • + Enormous template library (7,000+ board templates, 300+ retro formats) plus the Miroverse community gallery
  • + AI clustering groups sticky notes by colour, tag, author, keyword and sentiment — real time saved on a 60-sticky board
  • + First-party two-way card sync to Jira, Azure DevOps, Asana, Linear and ClickUp, so a sticky becomes tracked work in one click
  • + <strong>Engage</strong> activities — live polls, word clouds, scales, ranking — are included with Business; participants join by QR code with no Miro account
  • + Enterprise-grade SSO, SCIM, audit logs, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 42001 and US/EU/AU/Japan data residency; official MCP server on every plan

Miro — cons

  • − Per-seat pricing: 24 people cost $192/mo on Starter (annual). The tier that actually matters for retros — Business, with two-way Jira sync, SSO, guests and Engage — is $480/mo
  • − Recent G2 reviewers' loudest complaint is billing, not the canvas: guests converted to paid licences and prorated mid-cycle seat charges
  • − No health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal team pulse; Engage Scales reads the room once, it doesn't draw a trend line
  • − No recurring retros, scheduling, action carryover, cross-team rollup or action dashboard — facilitators rebuild structure each sprint, and actions only persist as Jira/Azure DevOps/Linear cards
  • − SCIM, audit logs, domain control and data residency are Enterprise-only, and Enterprise starts at 30 seats

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.