LetRetro
5.6The retro tool that thinks with your team
LetRetro is a young, AI-forward retrospective platform built around retros wired into sprint data. Its headline differentiator is now shipped rather than promised: an official MCP server lets Claude, Cursor, VS Code and other AI clients read and drive boards directly. Real-time collaborative boards, AI-generated retro documentation, sentiment/trend analysis and a team health checker sit on flat (pooled-seat) pricing rather than per-user, with Jira, GitHub, GitLab and Linear card linking to close the loop.
Full review →
Spreo
5.3Playful collaborative whiteboard for agile teams
Spreo (formerly Metro Retro, then Ludi — renamed Spreo on 1 July 2026 after a US trademark cease-and-desist) is a visual agile collaboration whiteboard with 100+ templates spanning retros, planning poker, icebreakers and futurespectives. Its illustrated canvas and board gadgets — a shared Jukebox music player, timers, spinners, buzzers, confetti, throwable hats — make ceremonies feel engaging. Both the Jira integration and SSO require the $6/user Business plan, and AI stops at beta sticky-note clustering.
Full review →Summary
LetRetro scores 5.6 overall and is best for developer-leaning agile teams and startups that want AI-assisted retros wired into their sprint data and dev stack — Jira, GitHub, GitLab and Linear card linking, plus an official MCP server their AI clients can drive — with health and sentiment tracking and no enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.
Spreo scores 5.3 overall and is best for agile teams who want retros, planning and workshops to feel visual and fun, with a solid Jira-backed delivery loop — budget for the Business plan, which is where Jira and SSO actually live. It offers paid plans from $4/user/mo billed annually ($5 monthly).
LetRetro leads on value, AI & insights and integrations. Spreo leads on ease of use, fun factor and enterprise-grade.
Across our eight scoring dimensions, LetRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 5.6. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.
Scores compared
| Detail | LetRetro | Spreo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Retrospectives | Retrospectives |
| Team size | Small | Small |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Free limit | 3 boards, 1 team, 20 pooled seats, 2 AI docs/mo, 5 exports/mo, community support | 30-day free trial; boards become read-only when the trial expires |
| Starting price | $15/mo (Pro, flat) | $4/user/mo billed annually ($5 monthly) |
| Est. 3 teams × 8 people | $15/mo (Pro — flat plan covers unlimited teams within its 200 pooled-seat cap; 24 users fits) | $144/mo billed annually (Business — 24 x $6; Starter's $96/mo covers only one shared team space) |
| Enterprise | Yes | Yes |
| Founded | 2025 | 2020 |
| HQ | Bengaluru, India | UK |
| Data residency | — | European Union |
| Languages | English only | English only |
| Export formats | — | PDF · CSV · HTML · Markdown · JSON · Jira |
| Features | 21 | 40 |
| Integrations | 6 | 1 |
Feature & integration comparison
Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.
| Capability | LetRetro | Spreo |
|---|---|---|
| Features | ||
| AI Summaries | ✓ | — |
| AI grouping/clustering | — | ✓note |
| AI action items | ✓note | — |
| Action tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Team Insights | ✓note | — |
| Polling | ✓note | ✓note |
| Action dashboard | ✓note | — |
| Custom templates | ✓note | ✓ |
| Anonymous input | ✓ | ✓note |
| Independent voting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Async mode | — | — |
| Agile Estimations | — | ✓ |
| Health Checks | ✓note | — |
| Team Kudos | — | ✓note |
| Whiteboard | — | ✓ |
| Integrations | ||
| Asana | — | — |
| Azure DevOps | — | — |
| Basecamp | — | — |
| ClickUp | — | — |
| Confluence | — | — |
| GitHub | ✓ | — |
| GitLab | ✓ | — |
| Jira | ✓ | ✓note |
| Linear | ✓ | — |
| Microsoft Teams | — | — |
| Monday.com | — | — |
| Notion | ✓ | — |
| Shortcut | — | — |
| Slack | ✓note | — |
| Trello | — | — |
| Security & Privacy | ||
| SOC 2 | — | ✓note |
| GDPR | ✓note | ✓ |
| SSO / SAML | ✓note | ✓note |
| SCIM provisioning | — | — |
| ISO 27001 | — | — |
| On-premises | ✓note | ✓note |
| Public API | — | — |
| Webhooks | — | — |
| MCP server | ✓note | — |
LetRetro — pros
- + Flat pricing — $15/mo Pro covers unlimited boards and teams within a 200 pooled-seat cap, so a growing org isn't billed per head
- + AI is a genuine focus, not a bolt-on: retro-doc generation, sentiment/trend analysis, key takeaways and improvement suggestions that cut the post-retro write-up burden
- + An <strong>official MCP server actually shipped</strong> in July 2026 — one-command install, 17 tools, 11 clients — so Claude, Cursor or VS Code can read boards and file cards without a bespoke script
- + Dev-stack card linking is real and reasonably deep: Jira, GitHub, GitLab and Linear, with inline issue editing, comments and one card linked across several providers at once
- + Built-in team health checker and sentiment-over-time trend dashboards — longitudinal signal many cheap retro tools skip
LetRetro — cons
- − Thin enterprise story: Google and Microsoft sign-in but no SAML SSO, SCIM only 'in progress', no audit-log access, no LetRetro-held SOC 2 or ISO 27001; on-premise and SLA sit behind a quote-only Enterprise tier
- − Solo-founder micro-SaaS — the team page lists one person (Dhanush Kandhan, Bengaluru) still recruiting, and independent coverage is almost nil (9 Product Hunt upvotes, 2 reviews) — a real durability risk for procurement
- − The vendor's own pages contradict each other on connectors: the homepage badges Jira, Confluence and Asana 'Coming Soon' while the integrations page and comparison FAQ list all three as live. Verify anything you're depending on
- − Retro toolkit lacks facilitator staples: no confirmed timer, recurring/scheduled retros, parking lot, team agreements or async-first mode — it's built around live, real-time sessions
- − No public REST API and no webhooks, and the export formats behind the metered '5 exports/mo' limit aren't documented anywhere — MCP is the only programmatic route in
Spreo — pros
- + Genuinely delightful, illustrated UI that energises in-person and remote retros
- + Broad template library (100+) covering retros, icebreakers, planning poker, futurespectives, planning and estimation
- + Deep gadget shelf that actually serves the session: shared Jukebox music player, timers, spinners, buzzers, confetti, throwable hats
- + Fully configurable voting rounds — votes per person, duplicate votes, and voting on topics as well as individual stickies
- + Solid two-way Jira integration: backlog refinement, story points and issue creation in-board
- + @mentions and a notification centre across stickies, cards, text blocks and comments
- + EU-hosted (Amsterdam) and GDPR-aligned (SOC 2 / ISO 27001 sit at the Digital Ocean infrastructure layer, not Spreo)
Spreo — cons
- − No async retro mode, no recurring or scheduled retros
- − No team health check or longitudinal pulse product; mood/radar work via whiteboard templates only
- − Integrations limited to Jira — no Slack, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
- − <strong>Jira and SSO both start at the $6/user Business plan</strong>, so the $4 Starter headline is misleading past a single team space
- − AI limited to beta sticky-note clustering — no summaries, action-item extraction, sentiment or coaching
- − No ongoing free plan; expired trials pause to read-only
- − Desktop and laptop only — the vendor states Spreo runs on <em>"all desktop and laptop devices"</em>, with no mobile or tablet support
- − Two renames in under a year leave the review trail split across three names — G2 files it under <em>Ludi</em>, Capterra and Product Hunt under <em>Metro Retro</em>
Keep comparing
Other LetRetro comparisons
Other Spreo comparisons
Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.