LetRetro
5.4The retro tool that thinks with your team
LetRetro is a young, AI-forward retrospective platform that pitches itself as MCP-native and CLI-first, connecting to sprint data to surface what's slowing a team down. It centres on real-time collaborative boards, AI-generated retro documentation, sentiment/trend analysis and a team health checker, on a flat (pooled-seat) pricing model rather than per-user.
Full review →
Miro
7.0Innovation Workspace where retros happen on the same canvas as discovery and planning
Miro is the dominant online whiteboard, now repositioned as an AI-powered Innovation Workspace. It pairs an infinite canvas with a huge template library (300+ retro formats among thousands of community templates), AI clustering by sentiment/keyword/author, Sidekicks (AI teammates) and Flows (multi-step AI workflows), real-time + async collaboration, and a 250+ app marketplace including Jira, Azure DevOps, Asana, Linear, Confluence, Slack and Microsoft Teams.
Full review →Summary
LetRetro scores 5.4 overall and is best for developer-leaning agile teams and startups that want AI-assisted retros wired into their sprint data and dev stack (GitHub, GitLab, Linear), plus health and sentiment tracking, without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.
Miro scores 7.0 overall and is best for large product, design and engineering orgs that already run discovery, planning and retros on one canvas and want AI clustering plus deep Jira/Azure DevOps/Asana sync. It offers a free tier.
LetRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit and value. Miro leads on fun factor, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.
Across our eight scoring dimensions, Miro edges ahead with an overall score of 7.0. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.
Scores compared
| Detail | LetRetro | Miro |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Retrospectives | Whiteboard |
| Team size | Small | Enterprise |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Free limit | 3 boards, 1 team, 20 pooled seats, 2 AI docs/mo, 5 exports/mo, community support | 3 editable boards, ~10 AI credits/mo, full template library, 250+ app marketplace; no private boards or two-way integrations |
| Starting price | $15/mo (Pro, flat) | $8/user/mo |
| Est. 3 teams × 8 people | $15/mo (Pro — flat plan covers unlimited teams within its 200 pooled-seat cap; 24 users fits) | $192/mo billed annually (Starter, 24 seats) |
| Enterprise | Yes | Yes |
| Founded | — | 2011 |
| HQ | Bengaluru, India | Amsterdam, NL |
| Data residency | — | United States · European Union · Australia |
| Languages | English only | 8 (English, Spanish, German, …) |
| Export formats | — | Image · PDF · CSV |
| Features | 19 | 37 |
| Integrations | 6 | 11 |
Feature & integration comparison
Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.
| Capability | LetRetro | Miro |
|---|---|---|
| Features | ||
| AI Summaries | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI grouping/clustering | — | ✓ |
| AI action items | ✓note | — |
| Action tracking | ✓ | ✓note |
| Team Insights | ✓note | — |
| Polling | ✓note | ✓note |
| Action dashboard | ✓note | — |
| Custom templates | ✓note | ✓ |
| Anonymous input | ✓ | ✓note |
| Independent voting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Async mode | — | ✓ |
| Agile Estimations | — | ✓note |
| Health Checks | ✓note | — |
| Team Kudos | — | — |
| Whiteboard | — | ✓ |
| Integrations | ||
| Asana | — | ✓note |
| Azure DevOps | — | ✓note |
| Basecamp | — | — |
| ClickUp | — | ✓ |
| Confluence | — | ✓ |
| GitHub | ✓ | ✓note |
| GitLab | ✓ | — |
| Jira | ✓note | ✓note |
| Linear | ✓ | ✓note |
| Microsoft Teams | — | ✓ |
| Monday.com | — | — |
| Notion | ✓ | ✓ |
| Shortcut | — | — |
| Slack | ✓note | ✓ |
| Trello | — | ✓note |
| Security & Privacy | ||
| SOC 2 | — | ✓ |
| GDPR | ✓note | ✓ |
| SSO / SAML | — | ✓note |
| SCIM provisioning | — | ✓note |
| ISO 27001 | — | ✓ |
| On-premises | ✓note | — |
| Public API | — | ✓ |
| Webhooks | — | — |
| MCP server | — | ✓note |
LetRetro — pros
- + Flat pricing — $15/mo Pro covers unlimited boards and teams within a 200 pooled-seat cap, so a growing org isn't billed per head
- + AI is a genuine focus, not a bolt-on: retro-doc generation, sentiment/trend analysis, key takeaways and improvement suggestions that cut the post-retro write-up burden
- + Developer-stack integrations up front — GitHub, GitLab and Linear are live, unusual for a retro tool this young, alongside an <strong>MCP-native, CLI-first</strong> pitch
- + Built-in team health checker and sentiment-over-time trend dashboards — longitudinal signal many cheap retro tools skip
- + Real-time collaborative boards with anonymous input, live polls and one-click retro-to-task conversion, spun up with minimal setup
LetRetro — cons
- − Thin enterprise story: SSO isn't listed on any published tier, no SCIM or audit logs, no LetRetro-held SOC 2 or ISO 27001; the on-premise option and SLA sit behind a quote-only Enterprise tier
- − Founder-led micro-SaaS (built and run by Dhanush Kandhan in Bengaluru; self-described as an unfunded two-person weekend project) with a very thin public track record — a real durability risk for enterprise procurement
- − Integration list is aspirational — Jira, Confluence, Trello, Asana and ClickUp are all flagged 'coming soon', and the vendor's own copy is inconsistent about which connectors are actually live
- − Retro toolkit lacks facilitator staples: no confirmed timer, recurring/scheduled retros, parking lot, team agreements or async-first mode — it's built around live, real-time sessions
- − Free tier is tight — 3 boards, 1 team, 2 AI docs and 5 exports per month — so any regular use pushes teams onto Pro quickly
Miro — pros
- + Enormous template library (5,000+) and Miroverse community for retro formats
- + AI clustering groups sticky notes by sentiment, tag, author and keyword; Sidekicks and Flows extend AI deeper into the canvas
- + Best-in-class integration catalog (Jira, Azure DevOps, Asana, Linear, ClickUp, Confluence, Slack, Teams) with two-way card sync
- + Enterprise-grade SSO, SCIM, audit logs, ISO 27001, ISO 42001 (AI governance) and EU/US/AU data residency
- + Same canvas works for discovery, planning and retros — no context switching
Miro — cons
- − Per-seat pricing: a 24-person org pays ~$192/mo on the Starter tier (annual), well above retro-native tools at that headcount
- − No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal team-pulse
- − No recurring retros, scheduling, action carryover or cross-team rollup — facilitators rebuild structure each sprint
- − Full two-way card sync (Linear, ClickUp, Azure DevOps) and SSO sit behind the $20/user/mo Business tier; SCIM and audit logs only on Enterprise (30-seat min)
- − No built-in retro report or action-tracker dashboard
Keep comparing
Other LetRetro comparisons
Other Miro comparisons
See alternatives
Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.