Retrospective Tools

Kollabe vs Trune.io

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Kollabe logo

Kollabe

5.6

Agile meetings made easy — retros, standups and planning poker

Kollabe began life as a planning poker tool and has extended into retrospectives and standups — the estimation side remains the centre of gravity, with retros and standups added as adjacent rituals rather than the headline product. It bundles icebreakers, anonymous input, AI summaries and action-item sync-back to Jira, GitHub and Azure DevOps in a flat per-space workspace, and retro history exports in bulk to CSV or JSON. Recent additions include a Slack-based async standup flow, a public API and MCP server, and cross-ritual weekly reporting. Some retro mechanics the marketing asserts are not corroborated outside the vendor's own pages — verify the board before committing.

Full review →
Trune.io logo

Trune.io

4.3

Structured online retrospectives with team radar

Trune (formerly Fraankly) is an EU-built retrospective and team-feedback tool with pre-built and custom templates, anonymous cards, drag-to-group clustering, dot voting, action tracking, and team radars including the Spotify Squad Health Check. Hosted in Frankfurt with EU-only application data, and exports results to Excel, CSV or an emailed PDF.

Full review →

Summary

Kollabe scores 5.6 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams that want retros, standups and planning poker in one clean tool — without per-seat pricing. It offers a free tier.

Trune.io scores 4.3 overall and is best for small EU-based agile teams that want a simple, <strong>GDPR-aligned</strong> retro tool with templates, grouping, voting, and team radars — and don't need SSO, cross-team rollups, or AI analysis beyond a chat assistant. It offers a free tier.

Kollabe leads on ease of use, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and open platform. Trune.io leads on retro toolkit.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Kollabe edges ahead with an overall score of 5.6. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Kollabe
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit5.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights4.0
Integrations5.5
Open Platform5.5
Enterprise-grade2.0
Trune.io
Ease of Use6.0
Retro Toolkit6.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor3.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations4.0
Open Platform3.5
Enterprise-grade2.0
DetailKollabeTrune.io
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limit10 members per room, limited meetings/month, 7-day history, no data export5 free sessions, full Premium features, no credit card
Starting price$29/mo$19/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$87/mo (3 team spaces × $29 Premium; each space allows unlimited members)$57/mo
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded2023
HQSydney, AustraliaVienna, Austria
Data residencyGermany
LanguagesEnglish only2 (English, German)
Export formatsConfluence · CSV · JSONExcel · CSV · PDF
Features2919
Integrations69

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityKollabeTrune.io
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insightsnote
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checksnote
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asananote
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluencenotenote
GitHubnote
GitLab
Jiranote
Linearnotenote
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknotenote
Trellonote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public APInotenote
Webhooks
MCP servernote

Kollabe — pros

  • + Flat per-space pricing — unlimited team members on Premium ($29/mo)
  • + Bundles retros, standups, planning poker and icebreakers in one tool
  • + No-signup join links lower friction for ad-hoc participants; ease of use rates ~5.0/5 across 31 verified third-party reviews
  • + Retro action items become real Jira and GitHub tickets — confirmed in independent user reviews, not just vendor copy
  • + Bulk export of retro history to CSV or JSON, plus one-click Confluence pages; public API and MCP server on Premium

Kollabe — cons

  • Slack integration is standup-only (no retro summaries or actions to a channel); no Microsoft Teams
  • Solo-founder operation with no SOC 2, ISO 27001 or published GDPR posture; SSO/SAML and SLA sit behind Enterprise contact-sales
  • No health checks, team radars or longitudinal pulse — no way to track team trends across sprints
  • Several vendor-listed retro mechanics (independent dot voting, drag-to-group, AI grouping) are absent from the changelog and could not be corroborated
  • Free tier caps meetings/month with 7-day history and no data export; carrying actions between retros is paid-only

Trune.io — pros

  • + EU/Frankfurt data residency and GDPR-first posture — even the AI assistant runs on an EU-hosted function
  • + Per-team (not per-seat) pricing: $19/mo covers unlimited members, and the free tier gives 5 full sessions
  • + Native two-way Azure DevOps sync — action items out as work items, Done status back in
  • + Team radars include the Spotify Squad Health Check plus fully custom radars
  • + Exports cards, action items and radar results to Excel, CSV or an emailed PDF

Trune.io — cons

  • No SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, or audit logs — not enterprise-ready
  • The native iOS/Android apps are gone from both app stores, though the site still advertises them as new
  • AI stops at truneGPT, a ChatGPT-4 chat assistant — no clustering, summaries, action extraction, or sentiment analysis
  • Azure DevOps is the only native connector, and it needs the pricier Professional tier; everything else is a single one-way Zapier trigger
  • No recurring retros, async mode, parking lot, or agenda planner; reporting stops at team level with no cross-team rollups

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.