Retrospective Tools

Miro vs Trune.io

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Miro logo

Miro

7.1

Innovation Workspace where retros happen on the same canvas as discovery and planning

Miro is the dominant online whiteboard, now sold as an AI Innovation Workspace. It pairs an infinite canvas with a 7,000+ template library (300+ retro formats among them), AI clustering by sentiment/keyword/author, Engage live polls and word clouds (included with Business since June 2026), Blueprints for reusable multi-board workflows, real-time and async collaboration, and a 250+ app marketplace with first-party two-way card sync to Jira, Azure DevOps, Asana, Linear and ClickUp. An official MCP server runs on every plan under per-tier daily call quotas.

Full review →
Trune.io logo

Trune.io

4.3

Structured online retrospectives with team radar

Trune (formerly Fraankly) is an EU-built retrospective and team-feedback tool that runs a fixed four-phase session — silent writing, presenting, voting, actions — with 14 pre-built templates plus custom ones, anonymous cards, drag-to-group clustering, dot voting, action items with reminder emails, and team radars including the Spotify Squad Health Check. Hosted in Frankfurt with EU-only application data, available in five UI languages, and exports results to Excel, CSV or an emailed PDF.

Full review →

Summary

Miro scores 7.1 overall and is best for large product, design and engineering orgs that already run discovery, planning and retros on one canvas and want AI clustering plus deep Jira/Azure DevOps/Asana sync. It offers a free tier.

Trune.io scores 4.3 overall and is best for small EU-based agile teams that want a simple, <strong>GDPR-aligned</strong> retro tool with templates, grouping, voting, and team radars — and can live with a vendor whose public site is currently offline and whose app has not shipped a release in a year. It offers a free tier.

Miro leads on ease of use, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade. Trune.io leads on retro toolkit and value.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Miro edges ahead with an overall score of 7.1. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Miro
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value5.0
Fun Factor7.5
AI & Insights7.0
Integrations9.0
Open Platform6.5
Enterprise-grade9.5
Trune.io
Ease of Use6.0
Retro Toolkit6.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor3.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations4.0
Open Platform3.5
Enterprise-grade2.0
DetailMiroTrune.io
CategoryWhiteboardRetrospectives
Team sizeEnterpriseSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limit3 editable boards, limited AI credits, 100 MCP calls/day, full 7,000+ template library, 250+ app marketplace; no private boards, SSO, guests, Blueprints or two-way integrations5 free sessions, full Premium features, no credit card
Starting price$8/user/mo$19/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$192/mo billed annually (Starter, 24 seats)$57/mo
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded2011
HQAmsterdam, NLVienna, Austria
Data residencyUnited States · European Union · Australia · JPGermany
Languages8 (English, Spanish, German, …)5 (English, German, Dutch, …)
Export formatsImage · PDF · CSVExcel · CSV · PDF
Features4024
Integrations129

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityMiroTrune.io
Features
Custom templates
Anonymous inputnote
Health Checksnote
Action trackingnote
Async mode
Whiteboard
Independent voting
Pollingnote
Icebreaker games
Agile Estimationsnote
Team Kudos
AI grouping/clustering
AI action itemsnote
AI Summaries
Team Insights
In-meeting AI assistantnotenote
Action dashboard
Integrations
Asananotenote
Azure DevOpsnotenote
Basecamp
ClickUpnote
Confluencenote
GitHubnotenote
GitLab
Jiranotenote
Linearnotenote
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.comnote
Notionnote
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trellonotenote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooks
MCP servernote

Miro — pros

  • + Enormous template library (7,000+ board templates, 300+ retro formats) plus the Miroverse community gallery
  • + AI clustering groups sticky notes by colour, tag, author, keyword and sentiment — real time saved on a 60-sticky board
  • + First-party two-way card sync to Jira, Azure DevOps, Asana, Linear and ClickUp, so a sticky becomes tracked work in one click
  • + <strong>Engage</strong> activities — live polls, word clouds, scales, ranking — are included with Business; participants join by QR code with no Miro account
  • + Enterprise-grade SSO, SCIM, audit logs, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 42001 and US/EU/AU/Japan data residency; official MCP server on every plan

Miro — cons

  • Per-seat pricing: 24 people cost $192/mo on Starter (annual). The tier that actually matters for retros — Business, with two-way Jira sync, SSO, guests and Engage — is $480/mo
  • Recent G2 reviewers' loudest complaint is billing, not the canvas: guests converted to paid licences and prorated mid-cycle seat charges
  • No health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal team pulse; Engage Scales reads the room once, it doesn't draw a trend line
  • No recurring retros, scheduling, action carryover, cross-team rollup or action dashboard — facilitators rebuild structure each sprint, and actions only persist as Jira/Azure DevOps/Linear cards
  • SCIM, audit logs, domain control and data residency are Enterprise-only, and Enterprise starts at 30 seats

Trune.io — pros

  • + EU/Frankfurt data residency and GDPR-first posture — even the truneGPT assistant runs on an EU-hosted function
  • + Per-team (not per-seat) pricing: $19/mo covers unlimited members, and the free tier gives 5 full sessions
  • + Native two-way Azure DevOps sync — action items out as work items, Done status back in
  • + Team radars include the Spotify Squad Health Check plus fully custom radars
  • + Ships in five UI languages (English, German, Dutch, French, Italian) and exports to Excel, CSV or an emailed PDF

Trune.io — cons

  • <strong>trune.io has been returning a WordPress fatal error on every page since late July 2026</strong> — pricing, sign-up and support included. Only the app at app.trune.io still loads
  • No SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, or audit logs — not enterprise-ready
  • Both native mobile apps are 404 on the App Store and Google Play, and the web app has not been redeployed since September 2025
  • AI stops at truneGPT, a ChatGPT-4 chat assistant — no clustering, summaries or action extraction
  • Azure DevOps is the only native connector and needs the pricier Professional tier; everything else is a single one-way Zapier trigger

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.