Retrospective Tools

FigJam vs Trune.io

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

FigJam logo

FigJam

7.2

Figma's whiteboard with AI sticky clustering, voting sessions and a $3 Collab seat — free tier caps at 3 boards

FigJam is the whiteboard product inside Figma — sticky notes, timer, music, expressive cursor stamps, voting sessions, an AI co-pilot that clusters and summarises stickies, and 300+ ready-made templates including community retro boards. Design and product teams already living in Figma get retros without buying a second tool, backed by Figma's SAML/SCIM, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and EU data hosting on Organization and Enterprise plans. Voting sessions, audio chat and no-account guest links all require a paid team.

Full review →
Trune.io logo

Trune.io

4.3

Structured online retrospectives with team radar

Trune (formerly Fraankly) is an EU-built retrospective and team-feedback tool with pre-built and custom templates, anonymous cards, drag-to-group clustering, dot voting, action tracking, and team radars including the Spotify Squad Health Check. Hosted in Frankfurt with EU-only application data, and exports results to Excel, CSV or an emailed PDF.

Full review →

Summary

FigJam scores 7.2 overall and is best for design and product teams already on Figma who want retros on the same platform as their design files, with playful engagement and AI clustering. It offers a free tier.

Trune.io scores 4.3 overall and is best for small EU-based agile teams that want a simple, <strong>GDPR-aligned</strong> retro tool with templates, grouping, voting, and team radars — and don't need SSO, cross-team rollups, or AI analysis beyond a chat assistant. It offers a free tier.

FigJam leads on ease of use, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade. Trune.io leads on retro toolkit.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, FigJam edges ahead with an overall score of 7.2. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

FigJam
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit4.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor9.0
AI & Insights5.0
Integrations6.0
Open Platform8.5
Enterprise-grade9.5
Trune.io
Ease of Use6.0
Retro Toolkit6.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor3.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations4.0
Open Platform3.5
Enterprise-grade2.0
DetailFigJamTrune.io
CategoryWhiteboardRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limitStarter: 3 FigJam files per team (unlimited personal drafts), 150 AI credits/day (500/month), templates, timer and music, 30-day version history — no voting sessions, audio chat or open (no-account) sessions5 free sessions, full Premium features, no credit card
Starting price$3/user/mo$19/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people~$72/mo (24 Collab seats × $3, annual) — more if hosts need Full seats$57/mo
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded2012
HQSan Francisco, USVienna, Austria
Data residencyUnited States · European UnionGermany
LanguagesEnglish only2 (English, German)
Export formatsPDF · Image · CSVExcel · CSV · PDF
Features3919
Integrations109

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityFigJamTrune.io
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action itemsnote
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent votingnote
Async mode
Agile Estimationsnote
Health Checksnote
Team Kudosnote
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asananotenote
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluencenotenote
GitHubnotenote
GitLab
Jiranotenote
Linearnotenote
Microsoft Teamsnotenote
Monday.comnote
Notionnote
Shortcut
Slacknotenote
Trellonotenote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooks
MCP servernote

FigJam — pros

  • + Cheap $3/user/mo Collab seat unlocks unlimited boards without a full Figma editor seat
  • + Free Starter tier includes real AI credits (150/day, 500/month), 300+ templates, the timer and music
  • + Same login and platform as Figma — zero friction for design-led teams
  • + Playful, engaging UX — stamps, emotes, high-fives, music, cursor chat — lifts retro fun factor
  • + Strong enterprise posture inherited from Figma: SAML, SCIM, activity logs, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, EU data hosting on Enterprise

FigJam — cons

  • No native action-item tracking, recurring retros or health checks
  • Anonymity is weak — votes reveal who voted once the session ends, and stickies always carry a name
  • Official connectors embed Figma files in Jira/Confluence/Linear/Notion rather than pushing action items out; GitHub-issue creation is a community widget; no Azure DevOps
  • Free Starter caps a team at 3 FigJam files and excludes voting sessions, audio chat and no-account guest links
  • Built primarily for designers — the canvas paradigm is fiddly for structured retros, and large boards get sluggish

Trune.io — pros

  • + EU/Frankfurt data residency and GDPR-first posture — even the AI assistant runs on an EU-hosted function
  • + Per-team (not per-seat) pricing: $19/mo covers unlimited members, and the free tier gives 5 full sessions
  • + Native two-way Azure DevOps sync — action items out as work items, Done status back in
  • + Team radars include the Spotify Squad Health Check plus fully custom radars
  • + Exports cards, action items and radar results to Excel, CSV or an emailed PDF

Trune.io — cons

  • No SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, or audit logs — not enterprise-ready
  • The native iOS/Android apps are gone from both app stores, though the site still advertises them as new
  • AI stops at truneGPT, a ChatGPT-4 chat assistant — no clustering, summaries, action extraction, or sentiment analysis
  • Azure DevOps is the only native connector, and it needs the pricier Professional tier; everything else is a single one-way Zapier trigger
  • No recurring retros, async mode, parking lot, or agenda planner; reporting stops at team level with no cross-team rollups

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.