Retrospective Tools

TeamRetro vs Trune.io

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

TeamRetro logo

TeamRetro

8.7

Retrospectives, health checks and agile estimations in one suite

TeamRetro pairs structured retrospectives with longitudinal team health checks and planning-poker estimations, aimed at agile organisations running multiple teams under a coach or programme. An in-meeting AI assistant (trAI) and a GA MCP server sit on top of all paid plans.

Full review →
Trune.io logo

Trune.io

4.3

Structured online retrospectives with team radar

Trune (formerly Fraankly) is an EU-built retrospective and team-feedback tool that runs a fixed four-phase session — silent writing, presenting, voting, actions — with 14 pre-built templates plus custom ones, anonymous cards, drag-to-group clustering, dot voting, action items with reminder emails, and team radars including the Spotify Squad Health Check. Hosted in Frankfurt with EU-only application data, available in five UI languages, and exports results to Excel, CSV or an emailed PDF.

Full review →

Summary

TeamRetro scores 8.7 overall and is best for agile coaches and engineering managers running ongoing health-check programmes alongside sprint retros. It offers paid plans from $20.83/mo billed annually ($25/mo billed monthly) — Single Team, 1 team, 25 members.

Trune.io scores 4.3 overall and is best for small EU-based agile teams that want a simple, <strong>GDPR-aligned</strong> retro tool with templates, grouping, voting, and team radars — and can live with a vendor whose public site is currently offline and whose app has not shipped a release in a year. It offers a free tier.

TeamRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, TeamRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.7. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

TeamRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit9.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor8.5
AI & Insights8.5
Integrations9.0
Open Platform9.0
Enterprise-grade8.5
Trune.io
Ease of Use6.0
Retro Toolkit6.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor3.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations4.0
Open Platform3.5
Enterprise-grade2.0
DetailTeamRetroTrune.io
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeAnySmall
Free tierNoYes
Free limitNo free plan — 30-day trial, no credit card required5 free sessions, full Premium features, no credit card
Starting price$20.83/mo billed annually ($25/mo billed monthly) — Single Team, 1 team, 25 members$19/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$50/mo billed annually ($60/mo billed monthly) — Small Organization plan, a 3-team bundle with unlimited members$57/mo
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded2017
HQAustraliaVienna, Austria
Data residencyUnited States · European UnionGermany
Languages29 (English, Arabic, Bengali, …)5 (English, German, Dutch, …)
Export formatsExcel · CSV · PDF · Markdown · Email · ImageExcel · CSV · PDF
Features6824
Integrations159

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityTeamRetroTrune.io
Features
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Health Checksnote
Action tracking
Async mode
Whiteboard
Independent voting
Polling
Icebreaker gamesnote
Agile Estimations
Team Kudos
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
AI Summaries
Team Insights
In-meeting AI assistantnotenote
Action dashboard
Integrations
Asananote
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluencenote
GitHubnote
GitLab
Jiranote
Linearnote
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trellonote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPR
SSO / SAML
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001note
On-premises
Public APInotenote
Webhooks
MCP server

TeamRetro — pros

  • + Health checks and maturity models as a first-class module — custom dimensions, radar charts, trends across sprints
  • + Three modules on one subscription: retrospectives, health checks, planning-poker estimation
  • + SAML SSO, RBAC and US-or-EU hosting on <em>every</em> plan, not just Enterprise
  • + GA MCP server, team-level API keys and HMAC-signed webhooks on all plans; 15 native agile-stack integrations plus Zapier and n8n
  • + <em>trAI</em> in-meeting assistant on trial and paid plans, plus 12 native in-meeting icebreaker games on every account

TeamRetro — cons

  • No free tier — 30-day trial, then a paid plan
  • The SOC 2 Type 2 report is Enterprise-only; lower tiers get the SOC 3 report instead
  • SCIM, IP allowlisting, domain capture and guest/observer roles are Enterprise-only, and audit logs are on request rather than self-serve
  • Cross-team insights, reports and programs (team-of-teams) require Enterprise
  • ISO 27001 is inherited from AWS, and hosting is US or EU only — no APAC region despite the Australian HQ

Trune.io — pros

  • + EU/Frankfurt data residency and GDPR-first posture — even the truneGPT assistant runs on an EU-hosted function
  • + Per-team (not per-seat) pricing: $19/mo covers unlimited members, and the free tier gives 5 full sessions
  • + Native two-way Azure DevOps sync — action items out as work items, Done status back in
  • + Team radars include the Spotify Squad Health Check plus fully custom radars
  • + Ships in five UI languages (English, German, Dutch, French, Italian) and exports to Excel, CSV or an emailed PDF

Trune.io — cons

  • <strong>trune.io has been returning a WordPress fatal error on every page since late July 2026</strong> — pricing, sign-up and support included. Only the app at app.trune.io still loads
  • No SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, or audit logs — not enterprise-ready
  • Both native mobile apps are 404 on the App Store and Google Play, and the web app has not been redeployed since September 2025
  • AI stops at truneGPT, a ChatGPT-4 chat assistant — no clustering, summaries or action extraction
  • Azure DevOps is the only native connector and needs the pricier Professional tier; everything else is a single one-way Zapier trigger

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.