Retrospective Tools

TeamRetro vs Trune.io

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

TeamRetro logo

TeamRetro

8.4

Retrospectives, health checks and agile estimations in one suite

TeamRetro pairs structured retrospectives with longitudinal team health checks and planning-poker estimations, aimed at agile organisations running multiple teams under a coach or programme.

Full review →
Trune.io logo

Trune.io

3.9

Structured online retrospectives with team radar

Trune (formerly Fraankly) is an EU-built retrospective and team-feedback tool with pre-built and custom templates, anonymous voting, action tracking, and an Agility Health Radar for trending team health over time. Hosted in Frankfurt with a strong GDPR posture.

Full review →

Summary

TeamRetro scores 8.4 overall and is best for agile coaches and engineering managers running ongoing health-check programmes alongside sprint retros. It offers paid plans from $25/mo.

Trune.io scores 3.9 overall and is best for small EU-based agile teams that want a simple, <strong>GDPR-aligned</strong> retro tool with templates, voting, and a lightweight team radar — and don't need SSO, AI, or cross-team rollups. It offers a free tier.

TeamRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, TeamRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

TeamRetro
Ease of Use 9.0
Retro Toolkit 9.0
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 6.0
AI & Insights 8.0
Integrations 9.0
Enterprise-grade 9.5
Trune.io
Ease of Use 6.0
Retro Toolkit 5.0
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 3.0
AI & Insights 0.0
Integrations 3.0
Enterprise-grade 2.0
Detail TeamRetro Trune.io
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Any Small
Free tier No Yes
Free limit 30-day free trial, no credit card required 5 free sessions, full Premium features, no credit card
Starting price $25/mo $19/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $50/mo billed annually $57/mo
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2017
HQ Australia Vienna, Austria
Data residency United States · European Union Germany
Languages 30 (English, Arabic, Bengali, …) 2 (English, German)
Features 63 17
Integrations 15 9

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability TeamRetro Trune.io
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks note
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana note
Azure DevOps note
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence note
GitHub note
GitLab
Jira note
Linear note
Microsoft Teams note
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack note
Trello note
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAML
SCIM provisioning note
ISO 27001 note
On-premises
Public API note note
Webhooks

TeamRetro — pros

  • + Health checks with custom models, longitudinal tracking and cross-team reporting
  • + Three modules in one suite (retros, health checks, planning poker)
  • + Complete enterprise stack: SAML SSO, SCIM and audit logs, SOC 2 Type 2 held directly, US/EU data residency
  • + AI grouping, template suggestions, action items and sentiment built in
  • + Broad agile-tool integrations including Jira, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence

TeamRetro — cons

  • No free tier — 30-day trial only, then a paid plan is required
  • SCIM provisioning and the public API are gated to the Enterprise tier
  • ISO 27001 is inherited via AWS, not held directly
  • Data residency limited to US and EU (no APAC region)

Trune.io — pros

  • + EU/Frankfurt data residency and GDPR-first posture
  • + Free tier covers 5 full-featured sessions, no card required
  • + Per-team (not per-seat) pricing keeps costs predictable
  • + Agility Health Radar gives a basic longitudinal view
  • + Native iOS/Android apps for hybrid retros

Trune.io — cons

  • No SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, or audit logs — not enterprise-ready
  • No AI features (clustering, summaries, action extraction, sentiment)
  • Integrations (Jira, Azure DevOps, Slack, Teams, Trello) run through Zapier, not native; integrations also require the higher Professional tier
  • Light on facilitation extras: no parking lot, agenda planner, async mode, or drag-and-drop grouping
  • Reporting is limited to per-team stats; no cross-team or org rollups
← All comparisons