A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Retrospectives, health checks and agile estimations in one suite
TeamRetro pairs structured retrospectives with longitudinal team health checks and planning-poker estimations, aimed at agile organisations running multiple teams under a coach or programme. An in-meeting AI assistant (trAI) and a GA MCP server sit on top of all paid plans.
Full review →
Structured online retrospectives with team radar
Trune (formerly Fraankly) is an EU-built retrospective and team-feedback tool that runs a fixed four-phase session — silent writing, presenting, voting, actions — with 14 pre-built templates plus custom ones, anonymous cards, drag-to-group clustering, dot voting, action items with reminder emails, and team radars including the Spotify Squad Health Check. Hosted in Frankfurt with EU-only application data, available in five UI languages, and exports results to Excel, CSV or an emailed PDF.
Full review →TeamRetro scores 8.7 overall and is best for agile coaches and engineering managers running ongoing health-check programmes alongside sprint retros. It offers paid plans from $20.83/mo billed annually ($25/mo billed monthly) — Single Team, 1 team, 25 members.
Trune.io scores 4.3 overall and is best for small EU-based agile teams that want a simple, <strong>GDPR-aligned</strong> retro tool with templates, grouping, voting, and team radars — and can live with a vendor whose public site is currently offline and whose app has not shipped a release in a year. It offers a free tier.
TeamRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.
Across our eight scoring dimensions, TeamRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.7. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.
| Detail | TeamRetro | Trune.io |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Retrospectives | Retrospectives |
| Team size | Any | Small |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Free limit | No free plan — 30-day trial, no credit card required | 5 free sessions, full Premium features, no credit card |
| Starting price | $20.83/mo billed annually ($25/mo billed monthly) — Single Team, 1 team, 25 members | $19/mo |
| Est. 3 teams × 8 people | $50/mo billed annually ($60/mo billed monthly) — Small Organization plan, a 3-team bundle with unlimited members | $57/mo |
| Enterprise | Yes | Yes |
| Founded | 2017 | — |
| HQ | Australia | Vienna, Austria |
| Data residency | United States · European Union | Germany |
| Languages | 29 (English, Arabic, Bengali, …) | 5 (English, German, Dutch, …) |
| Export formats | Excel · CSV · PDF · Markdown · Email · Image | Excel · CSV · PDF |
| Features | 68 | 24 |
| Integrations | 15 | 9 |
Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.
| Capability | TeamRetro | Trune.io |
|---|---|---|
| Features | ||
| Custom templates | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anonymous input | ✓ | ✓ |
| Health Checks | ✓ | ✓note |
| Action tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Async mode | ✓ | — |
| Whiteboard | ✓ | — |
| Independent voting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Polling | ✓ | — |
| Icebreaker games | ✓note | — |
| Agile Estimations | ✓ | — |
| Team Kudos | ✓ | — |
| AI grouping/clustering | ✓ | — |
| AI action items | ✓ | — |
| AI Summaries | ✓ | — |
| Team Insights | ✓ | — |
| In-meeting AI assistant | ✓note | ✓note |
| Action dashboard | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations | ||
| Asana | ✓ | ✓note |
| Azure DevOps | ✓ | ✓note |
| Basecamp | ✓ | — |
| ClickUp | ✓ | — |
| Confluence | ✓ | ✓note |
| GitHub | ✓ | ✓note |
| GitLab | ✓ | — |
| Jira | ✓ | ✓note |
| Linear | ✓ | ✓note |
| Microsoft Teams | ✓ | ✓note |
| Monday.com | ✓ | — |
| Notion | ✓ | — |
| Shortcut | ✓ | — |
| Slack | ✓ | ✓note |
| Trello | ✓ | ✓note |
| Security & Privacy | ||
| SOC 2 | ✓note | — |
| GDPR | ✓ | ✓ |
| SSO / SAML | ✓ | — |
| SCIM provisioning | ✓note | — |
| ISO 27001 | ✓note | — |
| On-premises | — | — |
| Public API | ✓note | ✓note |
| Webhooks | ✓ | — |
| MCP server | ✓ | — |
Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.