Retrospective Tools

Estimioo vs SprintRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Estimioo logo

Estimioo

3.8

Free planning poker, retrospectives and standups for Scrum teams

Estimioo is a lightweight, browser-based agile-ceremony tool that bundles AI-assisted planning poker, a template-driven sprint retrospective board and async daily standups into one shared workspace. The product's centre of gravity is estimation, but the retro module has grown since launch: the vendor now lists a library of retrospective formats (Start/Stop/Continue, Sailboat, Mad/Sad/Glad, 4Ls, Starfish, Sprint Timeline and more) rather than a single fixed board. It's still a reflection-and-summary tool, not a deep facilitation suite with dot voting, grouping and owned action items.

Full review →
SprintRetro logo

SprintRetro

4.4

Free sprint retros, embedded in Jira

SprintRetro is a free Atlassian Forge app from Agile Pulse that runs sprint retrospectives directly inside Jira Cloud. It pulls live sprint metrics (velocity, predictability, scope change, carryover, cycle time) into a collaborative retro board and — since a mid-2026 expansion — adds an infinite whiteboard, anonymous team-health pulse checks, timers, and an AI facilitator, alongside templates, anonymous voting, action items that carry over between retros, GIFs, kudos, polls, and icebreakers. A separate paid Pro listing exists for advanced features.

Full review →

Summary

Estimioo scores 3.8 overall and is best for small, distributed Scrum teams who mainly want fast, AI-assisted planning poker and async standups, and want a template-driven reflection board for retros rather than a full facilitation suite with voting, grouping and owned action items. It offers a free tier.

SprintRetro scores 4.4 overall and is best for scrum teams already living in Jira Cloud who want a no-cost, no-friction sprint retro tool with sprint metrics baked in. It offers a free tier.

Estimioo leads on AI & insights and open platform. SprintRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, SprintRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 4.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Estimioo
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit3.5
Value9.0
Fun Factor3.5
AI & Insights3.0
Integrations2.0
Open Platform0.5
Enterprise-grade1.5
SprintRetro
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit5.5
Value9.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations3.0
Open Platform0.0
Enterprise-grade2.0
DetailEstimiooSprintRetro
CategoryAll-in-One AgileRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limitUp to 10 participants, 5 sessions/month, 5 AI estimates/month, 1-hour session expiryFree for unlimited users on a Jira instance (free app listing)
Starting price$7/workspace/moFree
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$7/mo (Team plan is flat per-workspace, not per-seat)Free (within free tier)
EnterpriseNoNo
Founded
HQWaterlooville, United Kingdom
Data residency
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsCSV
Features1321
Integrations11

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityEstimiooSprintRetro
Features
AI Summariesnotenote
AI grouping/clusteringnote
AI action itemsnote
Action trackingnote
Team Insightsnote
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous inputnote
Independent voting
Async modenote
Agile Estimationsnote
Health Checksnote
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAML
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks
MCP server

Estimioo — pros

  • + Genuinely cheap — flat $7/workspace/mo Team plan (not per-seat) and a usable free tier
  • + Fast, no-friction planning poker with multiple scales and hidden-until-reveal voting
  • + AI story-point suggestions and estimation-accuracy tracking, powered by Claude with zero data retention
  • + Guests join without signup via link or QR code — low overhead for distributed teams
  • + Three ceremonies (poker, retro, standup) in one shared workspace

Estimioo — cons

  • Retro board is reflection-and-summary only — no dot voting, grouping, anonymity, phase timer or action items with owners and carry-over, even with the expanded template library
  • Verified AI is estimation-focused; the advertised Claude retro summaries (mood, themes, action items) couldn't be verified hands-on
  • No Slack/Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps integrations; Jira is a paste-URL preview for poker only
  • No SSO, SOC 2, audit logs or published data-residency — not built for enterprise procurement
  • Free sessions expire after 1 hour and cap at 5/month; no recurring retros or persistent retro history

SprintRetro — pros

  • + Genuinely free with unlimited users on your Jira instance (free app listing)
  • + Pulls <strong>real sprint metrics</strong> (velocity, predictability, scope change, carryover, cycle time) into the retro context
  • + Built on Atlassian Forge — runs entirely inside Jira Cloud, no external data egress
  • + Expanded fast: now adds an infinite whiteboard, timers, anonymous team-health pulse checks, and an AI facilitator
  • + Action items carry over automatically into the next retro for follow-up

SprintRetro — cons

  • Jira Cloud only — no Slack, Teams, GitHub, Linear, Confluence, or standalone web app
  • AI facilitation is thin and may be gated behind the paid <strong>Pro</strong> listing (~$210/yr for 25 Jira users) — the feature split between free and Pro isn't clearly documented
  • No async mode, presentation mode, drag-and-drop grouping, or scheduled/recurring retros
  • No SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, audit logs, or cross-team reporting
  • Young product (launched Sept 2025); ~682 free-app installs — fine for one team, less proven at scale

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.