Retrospective Tools

EasyRetro vs RetroFlow

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

EasyRetro logo

EasyRetro

5.3

Improve your team with fun sprint retrospectives

EasyRetro (rebranded from FunRetro in November 2020) is a long-running indie retro tool with 100+ templates, drag-and-drop boards, an AI board summary feature added in early 2024, and recent updates through 2026 including drawing-on-cards, hide-column and on-the-fly timer controls (pause/resume, +1 minute).

Full review →
RetroFlow logo

RetroFlow

3.3

Your team's favourite way to retro

RetroFlow is a free, no-signup retrospective board built by solo developer Prashant Meena, with colourful boards, real-time collaboration, 7 ready-made templates, anonymous feedback, dot voting and action items. Participants join a shared link in one click with no account; the whole product is free with no paid tiers or locked features.

Full review →

Summary

EasyRetro scores 5.3 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams, scrum masters and consultants who want a clean, fast, low-friction retro tool without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

RetroFlow scores 3.3 overall and is best for small or ad-hoc teams who want a genuinely free, zero-friction retro board they can share with one link — no signup, no payment and no setup, accepting that there are no integrations, AI or enterprise controls. It offers a free tier.

EasyRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade. RetroFlow leads on value.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, EasyRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 5.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

EasyRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit6.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform2.0
Enterprise-grade4.0
RetroFlow
Ease of Use8.0
Retro Toolkit3.5
Value9.0
Fun Factor4.5
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations0.0
Open Platform0.0
Enterprise-grade1.0
DetailEasyRetroRetroFlow
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limit1 public board/month, 1 survey, no team, unlimited participantsEverything is free — all 7 templates, real-time collaboration, anonymous feedback, dot voting and action items, with no account required to join a board
Starting price$28/moFree
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$67/mo (Business plan, 3 teams, unlimited members; $56/mo billed annually)Free (no paid tier)
EnterpriseYesNo
Founded2016
HQBrazil
Data residency
Languages2 (English, Portuguese)English only
Export formatsPDF · CSV · Image · Excel · Word · Confluence · Jira
Features247
Integrations50

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityEasyRetroRetroFlow
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Pollingnote
Action dashboard
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous inputnote
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimationsnote
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks
MCP server

EasyRetro — pros

  • + Extremely easy to use with minimal setup friction and a clean drag-and-drop board
  • + Library of 100+ retrospective templates spanning multiple categories and languages
  • + Free tier covers basic public boards for small teams or one-off retros
  • + Clean export options including Confluence, Jira (now bulk), PDF, CSV, PNG, Excel and DOCX
  • + Still actively maintained — drawing on cards, hide-column and on-the-fly timer controls shipped through 2026

EasyRetro — cons

  • No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal trend reporting
  • AI is limited to a single board-summary feature — no auto-grouping, AI action items, sentiment, or template generation
  • Integration set is narrow and mostly export-only — no GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps; the Teams integration embeds boards as tabs rather than pushing action items
  • Vendor itself isn't SOC 2 / ISO 27001 certified (relies on GCP); SAML SSO is gated to enterprise accounts and there's no SCIM or audit logs
  • Free plan is now capped at 1 public board per month (down from 3), keeps only 1 board on the dashboard, and excludes team boards

RetroFlow — pros

  • + Genuinely free with no paid tiers, no paywalled features and no account required to join a board
  • + Anonymous feedback — participants contribute with no signup, email or PII collected
  • + Three-step setup — pick a template, share the link, run the retro; participants join with one click
  • + Seven ready-made retrospective formats covering the common reflection patterns
  • + Real-time collaboration with live notes, dot voting and shared action items
  • + Light personalisation — custom column names, 2-6 columns, 7 colour palettes and 48 emojis

RetroFlow — cons

  • No integrations at all — nothing pushes to Jira, Linear, Slack, Teams or any agile-stack tool
  • No AI features (clustering, summary, action extraction or sentiment)
  • No health checks, recurring retros, mood tracking or cross-team reporting
  • No enterprise security or compliance — no SOC 2, SSO, SCIM or audit logs; the privacy policy confirms only HTTPS and Vercel hosting with Google Analytics/PostHog analytics
  • Built and run by a solo developer (Prashant Meena) with no support team or SLA — support routes to a personal WhatsApp number, and the server shows a cold-start delay (~10s wake-up) plus occasional infrastructure hiccups on first load
  • Boards are private only by unguessable URL — there are no accounts, so no real access control, invite management or board history

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.