Retrospective Tools

EasyRetro vs Parabol

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

EasyRetro logo

EasyRetro

5.8

Improve your team with fun sprint retrospectives

EasyRetro (rebranded from FunRetro in November 2020) is a long-running indie retro tool built around a fast drag-and-drop board and a 200-plus template library. 2026 added working AI — card grouping, board-column generation from a theme prompt and meeting summaries — plus numeric-scale and multiple-choice surveys, dashboard bulk actions, free PNG/CSV export and organisation audit logs.

Full review →
Parabol logo

Parabol

7.4

Open-source agile meetings for retros, poker, standups and check-ins

Parabol is an open-source agile meeting platform spanning retrospectives, sprint poker, async standups, team check-ins and lightweight team health, with deep backlog sync to Jira, GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps and Linear, recurring meeting series, Zoom and Google Meet transcript capture, a scoped GraphQL API, and a built-in knowledge base (Pages) that auto-publishes every meeting summary and runs AI queries across past retros.

Full review →

Summary

EasyRetro scores 5.8 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams, scrum masters and consultants who want a clean, fast, low-friction retro tool without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

Parabol scores 7.4 overall and is best for distributed agile teams that want one open-source tool for retros, poker, standups and lightweight team health. It offers a free tier.

EasyRetro leads on ease of use and value. Parabol leads on retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Parabol edges ahead with an overall score of 7.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

EasyRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit6.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights5.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform2.0
Enterprise-grade4.5
Parabol
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit9.0
Value5.0
Fun Factor7.0
AI & Insights8.0
Integrations9.0
Open Platform5.0
Enterprise-grade8.0
DetailEasyRetroParabol
CategoryRetrospectivesAll-in-One Agile
Team sizeSmallAny
Free tierYesYes
Free limit1 public board/month (max 1 on the dashboard, including archived), 1 survey per board, no teams or team boards, no AI features; unlimited participants and free PNG/CSV exportUnlimited users, 2 teams, 10 meetings/month, 30-day history, 2 custom templates, 3 AI retro summaries/month
Starting price$25/mo$8/active user/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$60/mo (Business plan, 3 teams, unlimited members; $50/mo billed annually)$192/mo
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20162015
HQBrazilRemote (San Diego, CA)
Data residencyUnited StatesUnited States · European Union · Self-hosted
Languages8 (English, Portuguese, Dutch, …)English only
Export formatsPDF · CSV · Image · Excel · Word · Confluence · JiraCSV · Email
Features3448
Integrations58

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityEasyRetroParabol
Features
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous input
Health Checksnotenote
Action tracking
Async mode
Whiteboard
Independent voting
Pollingnote
Icebreaker games
Agile Estimations
Team Kudos
AI grouping/clusteringnote
AI action items
AI Summariesnote
Team Insightsnote
In-meeting AI assistant
Action dashboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluencenote
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001
On-premisesnote
Public API
Webhooksnote
MCP server

EasyRetro — pros

  • + Fastest setup of any tool we run: pick a template, share a link, participants join with no account
  • + AI now does real work on the board — card grouping with reviewable merge suggestions, a meeting summary, and board columns generated from a theme prompt
  • + Survey engine got serious in June 2026: single-choice, multiple-choice and numeric-scale polls with Team Health Check, Team Safety, mood and meeting-value templates
  • + Flat per-team pricing with unlimited members — $60/mo covers three teams of any size — and PNG/CSV export went free in July 2026
  • + Plainly still shipping: five changelog entries in 2026, most recently organisation audit logs in July

EasyRetro — cons

  • The health surveys are one question on one board — no health model, no cadence, no trend line across sprints
  • Integrations are export-shaped: Jira, Confluence and Trello take cards out, Slack only announces new boards, and there's no GitHub, Linear, Azure DevOps or calendar
  • No public API, no webhooks and no MCP server — automation stops at the export button
  • Vendor holds no SOC 2 or ISO 27001 (it leans on Google Cloud's), data sits in US Central with no EU option, SAML SSO starts at $90/mo, audit logs at $150/mo, and SCIM doesn't exist
  • Free plan is now 1 public board per month and 1 board total on the dashboard (archived included), with AI features excluded

Parabol — pros

  • + Open source (AGPL-3.0) with Docker/Kubernetes self-host, on-prem and air-gapped deployment
  • + 40+ meeting templates plus poker, standups, check-ins and team health in one tool
  • + Strong backlog write-back to Jira, GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps and Linear
  • + CSV export of reflections, groups, votes and discussion threads on <em>every</em> tier
  • + Public GraphQL API with published schema, a GraphiQL explorer and scoped personal access tokens
  • + Recurring retro series with a real recurrence rule, Google Calendar sync and automatic facilitator rotation
  • + DoD Iron Bank hardened container — IL4 via Platform One, IL5 via Arcus

Parabol — cons

  • Free tier capped at 2 teams, 10 meetings/month, 30-day history and 3 AI summaries
  • No native whiteboard, presentation mode or screen-share mode
  • Health checks are still an emoji poll for most accounts — editable question packs and the standalone Team Health meeting sit behind an org feature flag
  • AI grouping and team health need the paid Team tier; Pages Insights and Confluence export need org-level enablement
  • Webhooks stop at Mattermost/MS Teams notification URLs — no general event subscriptions and no MCP server
  • English-only UI; no Trello, Asana, ClickUp or Notion integration

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.