Retrospective Tools

EasyRetro vs Neatro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

EasyRetro logo

EasyRetro

5.3

Improve your team with fun sprint retrospectives

EasyRetro (rebranded from FunRetro in November 2020) is a long-running indie retro tool with 100+ templates, drag-and-drop boards, an AI board summary feature added in early 2024, drawing-on-cards (August 2025), and 2026 updates including hide-column controls and on-the-fly timer controls (pause/resume, +1 minute).

Full review →
Neatro logo

Neatro

5.4

Structured retros built around psychological safety

Neatro runs retrospectives through a guided four-step framework with optional per-comment anonymity, ROTI feedback, and Team Radar health checks aimed at distributed agile teams.

Full review →

Summary

EasyRetro scores 5.3 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams, scrum masters and consultants who want a clean, fast, low-friction retro tool without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

Neatro scores 5.4 overall and is best for scrum Masters who want a guided, safety-first facilitation flow with built-in team health tracking. It offers a free tier.

EasyRetro leads on open platform. Neatro leads on retro toolkit and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Neatro edges ahead with an overall score of 5.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

EasyRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit6.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform2.0
Enterprise-grade4.0
Neatro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade4.5
DetailEasyRetroNeatro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallMid-market
Free tierYesYes
Free limit2 public boards/month (max 2 on the dashboard, including archived), 1 survey per board, no teams or team boards, unlimited participantsFree forever for up to 10 members, unlimited retrospectives and Team Radars, all ready-to-use templates, basic facilitation tools, 30-day data history
Starting price$25/mo$23.20/team/mo billed annually ($29/team/mo billed monthly)
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$60/mo (Business plan, 3 teams, unlimited members; $50/mo billed annually)$69.60/mo billed annually (3 teams x Premium; members per team are unlimited) — $87/mo if billed monthly
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20162020
HQBrazilQuebec, Canada
Data residencyCanada
Languages2 (English, Portuguese)2 (English, French)
Export formatsPDF · CSV · Image · Excel · Word · Confluence · JiraPDF · CSV · Jira
Features2529
Integrations55

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityEasyRetroNeatro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Pollingnote
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async modenote
Agile Estimationsnote
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asananote
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHubnote
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.comnote
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks
MCP server

EasyRetro — pros

  • + Extremely easy to use with minimal setup friction and a clean drag-and-drop board
  • + Library of 100+ retrospective templates spanning multiple categories and languages
  • + Clean export options including Confluence, Jira (now bulk), PDF, CSV, PNG, Excel and DOCX
  • + Flat per-team pricing with unlimited members — $60/mo covers three teams of any size
  • + Still actively maintained — hide-column and on-the-fly timer controls shipped in 2026, and the web app was rebuilt from AngularJS onto Vue mid-2026

EasyRetro — cons

  • No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal trend reporting
  • AI is limited to a single board-summary feature — no auto-grouping, AI action items, sentiment, or template generation
  • Integration set is narrow and mostly export-only — no GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps; the Teams integration embeds boards as tabs rather than pushing action items
  • Vendor itself isn't SOC 2 / ISO 27001 certified (relies on GCP); data sits in US Central with no EU residency option, SAML SSO starts at the $90/mo tier, and there's no SCIM
  • Free plan allows 2 public boards per month, keeps only 2 boards on the dashboard (archived ones included), and excludes teams and team boards entirely

Neatro — pros

  • + Guided four-step framework with optional anonymous commenting and a timer on every step
  • + Team Radar is a proper recurring health check with up to 10 custom dimensions, not a repurposed template
  • + Automatic ROTI survey on every retro closes the feedback loop
  • + Action Kanban board plus an automatic reminder of last retro's open actions keeps follow-through visible
  • + Cheap per head — <strong>$23.20/team/mo covers unlimited members</strong>, and the free tier runs 10 members forever

Neatro — cons

  • No native Slack or Microsoft Teams integration — reminders and summaries land wherever you paste the link
  • AI stops at grouping suggestions; no summaries, sentiment analysis, or AI-extracted action items
  • Per-team pricing gets awkward past a handful of squads — volume discounts only start at 20+ teams
  • No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own (the security FAQ points at Azure's), no GDPR statement, and hosting is Quebec-only
  • No cross-team rollups, org health dashboard, SCIM, audit logs, public API or webhooks

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.