Retrospective Tools

Neatro vs TeamRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Neatro logo

Neatro

5.6

Structured retros built around psychological safety

Neatro runs retrospectives through a guided four-step framework with anonymous brainstorming, ROTI feedback, and Team Radar health checks aimed at distributed agile teams.

Full review →
TeamRetro logo

TeamRetro

8.4

Retrospectives, health checks and agile estimations in one suite

TeamRetro pairs structured retrospectives with longitudinal team health checks and planning-poker estimations, aimed at agile organisations running multiple teams under a coach or programme.

Full review →

Summary

Neatro scores 5.6 overall and is best for scrum Masters who want a guided, safety-first facilitation flow with built-in team health tracking. It offers a free tier.

TeamRetro scores 8.4 overall and is best for agile coaches and engineering managers running ongoing health-check programmes alongside sprint retros. It offers paid plans from $25/mo.

TeamRetro leads on retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, TeamRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Neatro
Ease of Use 9.0
Retro Toolkit 7.5
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 5.5
AI & Insights 0.0
Integrations 5.0
Enterprise-grade 4.5
TeamRetro
Ease of Use 9.0
Retro Toolkit 9.0
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 6.0
AI & Insights 8.0
Integrations 9.0
Enterprise-grade 9.5
Detail Neatro TeamRetro
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Mid-market Any
Free tier Yes No
Free limit Free forever for up to 10 members, unlimited retrospectives, 70+ templates, 30-day data history 30-day free trial, no credit card required
Starting price $23.20/team/mo (annual) $25/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $69.60/mo billed annually (3 teams x Premium) $50/mo billed annually
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2020 2017
HQ Quebec, Canada Australia
Data residency Canada United States · European Union
Languages 2 (English, French) 30 (English, Arabic, Bengali, …)
Features 25 63
Integrations 5 15

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Neatro TeamRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAML note
SCIM provisioning note
ISO 27001 note
On-premises
Public API note
Webhooks

Neatro — pros

  • + Guided four-step framework that reliably produces psychological safety
  • + Team Radar is a proper recurring health check, not a repurposed template
  • + Automatic ROTI survey on every retro closes the feedback loop
  • + Action carryover and a Kanban tracker keep follow-through visible between sessions
  • + Generous free tier (up to 10 members, 70+ templates) and active blog/facilitation content

Neatro — cons

  • No native Slack or Microsoft Teams integration for notifications or reminders
  • No AI features at all — no clustering, summaries, sentiment, or action-item extraction
  • Per-team pricing model gets awkward as the org scales beyond a handful of squads
  • Not independently SOC 2, ISO 27001 or GDPR certified — relies on Azure's underlying certifications
  • No cross-team rollups, org-level dashboard, SCIM, or audit logs

TeamRetro — pros

  • + Health checks with custom models, longitudinal tracking and cross-team reporting
  • + Three modules in one suite (retros, health checks, planning poker)
  • + Complete enterprise stack: SAML SSO, SCIM and audit logs, SOC 2 Type 2 held directly, US/EU data residency
  • + AI grouping, template suggestions, action items and sentiment built in
  • + Broad agile-tool integrations including Jira, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence

TeamRetro — cons

  • No free tier — 30-day trial only, then a paid plan is required
  • SCIM provisioning and the public API are gated to the Enterprise tier
  • ISO 27001 is inherited via AWS, not held directly
  • Data residency limited to US and EU (no APAC region)
← All comparisons