Retrospective Tools

RetroTool vs TeamRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

RetroTool logo

RetroTool

3.5

Anonymous online retrospectives, no login required

RetroTool is a low-friction online retrospective board built by NY/Poland software agency u2i as a side project. Free anonymous retros run from a unique URL with no signup; paid tiers add private boards, team management and longer retention. The product still works, but the site shows no shipped activity in years.

Full review →
TeamRetro logo

TeamRetro

8.4

Retrospectives, health checks and agile estimations in one suite

TeamRetro pairs structured retrospectives with longitudinal team health checks and planning-poker estimations, aimed at agile organisations running multiple teams under a coach or programme.

Full review →

Summary

RetroTool scores 3.5 overall and is best for small or ad-hoc teams who want a free, no-signup retro board with secret voting and a few standard templates — provided you're comfortable using a tool that hasn't shipped visible updates in years. It offers a free tier.

TeamRetro scores 8.4 overall and is best for agile coaches and engineering managers running ongoing health-check programmes alongside sprint retros. It offers paid plans from $25/mo.

RetroTool leads on value. TeamRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, TeamRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

RetroTool
Ease of Use 7.5
Retro Toolkit 4.0
Value 9.0
Fun Factor 3.0
AI & Insights 0.0
Integrations 0.0
Enterprise-grade 1.0
TeamRetro
Ease of Use 9.0
Retro Toolkit 9.0
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 6.0
AI & Insights 8.0
Integrations 9.0
Enterprise-grade 9.5
Detail RetroTool TeamRetro
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Small Any
Free tier Yes No
Free limit Anonymous boards, unlimited cards, columns, action points and participants; 12-month retention; basic facilitation 30-day free trial, no credit card required
Starting price $10/mo $25/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $30/mo $50/mo billed annually
Enterprise No Yes
Founded 2017
HQ Poland Australia
Data residency United States · European Union
Languages English only 30 (English, Arabic, Bengali, …)
Features 18 63
Integrations 0 15

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability RetroTool TeamRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates note
Anonymous input note
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR note
SSO / SAML
SCIM provisioning note
ISO 27001 note
On-premises
Public API note
Webhooks

RetroTool — pros

  • + Genuinely free anonymous retros with no account required
  • + Three-click setup — unique URL, share, run
  • + Zero-knowledge encryption with custom passwords on Company plan
  • + Per-team flat pricing ($10 or $20/team/mo) rather than per-seat

RetroTool — cons

  • <strong>Apparently dormant</strong>: no blog, changelog or release notes; legal docs last updated 2020
  • No native integrations with Jira, Slack, Teams or any agile-stack tool
  • No AI features (clustering, summary, action extraction, sentiment)
  • No health checks, recurring retros, or cross-team reporting
  • Private invite-only boards and zero-knowledge encryption locked behind paid tiers
  • Not SOC 2; no SSO/SCIM/audit logs for enterprise buyers

TeamRetro — pros

  • + Health checks with custom models, longitudinal tracking and cross-team reporting
  • + Three modules in one suite (retros, health checks, planning poker)
  • + Complete enterprise stack: SAML SSO, SCIM and audit logs, SOC 2 Type 2 held directly, US/EU data residency
  • + AI grouping, template suggestions, action items and sentiment built in
  • + Broad agile-tool integrations including Jira, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence

TeamRetro — cons

  • No free tier — 30-day trial only, then a paid plan is required
  • SCIM provisioning and the public API are gated to the Enterprise tier
  • ISO 27001 is inherited via AWS, not held directly
  • Data residency limited to US and EU (no APAC region)
← All comparisons