Retrospective Tools

RetroTeam vs TeamRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

RetroTeam logo

RetroTeam

5.3

AI retrospective tool for high-performing teams

RetroTeam is a focused, AI-first retrospective app that runs teams through a structured capture, group, vote, and action-items flow with Jira sync.

Full review →
TeamRetro logo

TeamRetro

8.4

Retrospectives, health checks and agile estimations in one suite

TeamRetro pairs structured retrospectives with longitudinal team health checks and planning-poker estimations, aimed at agile organisations running multiple teams under a coach or programme.

Full review →

Summary

RetroTeam scores 5.3 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams who want lightweight AI-assisted retros and Jira hand-off without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

TeamRetro scores 8.4 overall and is best for agile coaches and engineering managers running ongoing health-check programmes alongside sprint retros. It offers paid plans from $25/mo.

RetroTeam leads on value. TeamRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, TeamRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

RetroTeam
Ease of Use 8.5
Retro Toolkit 5.0
Value 9.0
Fun Factor 4.0
AI & Insights 6.5
Integrations 2.5
Enterprise-grade 1.5
TeamRetro
Ease of Use 9.0
Retro Toolkit 9.0
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 6.0
AI & Insights 8.0
Integrations 9.0
Enterprise-grade 9.5
Detail RetroTeam TeamRetro
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Small Any
Free tier Yes No
Free limit 1 team, 10 users, 10 boards, 10 AI credits 30-day free trial, no credit card required
Starting price $10/mo $25/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $30/mo $50/mo billed annually
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2022 2017
HQ Australia
Data residency United States · European Union
Languages English only 30 (English, Arabic, Bengali, …)
Features 18 63
Integrations 1 15

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability RetroTeam TeamRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling note
Action dashboard
Custom templates note
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAML
SCIM provisioning note
ISO 27001 note
On-premises
Public API note
Webhooks

RetroTeam — pros

  • + Strong AI grouping and action-item generation
  • + Flat per-team pricing scales well for small squads
  • + Tight, opinionated retro flow (capture, group, vote, act)
  • + Direct Jira sync for action items
  • + Active product — weekly blog cadence through late March 2026
  • + Custom template builder for teams that outgrow the four presets

RetroTeam — cons

  • Integration set is Jira-only; Slack, Teams, GitHub, Linear, Azure DevOps not advertised
  • No health checks, kudos, or longitudinal team-pulse tracking
  • Light on enterprise controls (SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, audit logs not mentioned publicly)
  • AI is credit-gated — Premium ships 50 credits/mo, Pro 150; heavy use forces an upgrade
  • Only 4 built-in templates (custom builder fills the gap, but no template library)

TeamRetro — pros

  • + Health checks with custom models, longitudinal tracking and cross-team reporting
  • + Three modules in one suite (retros, health checks, planning poker)
  • + Complete enterprise stack: SAML SSO, SCIM and audit logs, SOC 2 Type 2 held directly, US/EU data residency
  • + AI grouping, template suggestions, action items and sentiment built in
  • + Broad agile-tool integrations including Jira, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence

TeamRetro — cons

  • No free tier — 30-day trial only, then a paid plan is required
  • SCIM provisioning and the public API are gated to the Enterprise tier
  • ISO 27001 is inherited via AWS, not held directly
  • Data residency limited to US and EU (no APAC region)
← All comparisons