Retrospective Tools

NimbleRetro vs Reetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

NimbleRetro logo

NimbleRetro

3.0

Time-boxed retros with 5-Why root cause analysis

NimbleRetro is the retrospective module inside NimbleWork's broader Nimble agile platform. It runs structured, time-bound retros through Ideate, Group, Vote, Discuss, and Feedback stages, with anonymous input, action item tracking, and a 5-Why root cause workflow. Mobile apps for iOS and Android complement the web product, and action items convert directly into Nimble workitems.

Full review →
Reetro logo

Reetro

6.4

Fun, easy and AI-powered online retrospectives

Reetro is a lightweight retrospective tool with a generous free tier and AI-powered paid tiers covering meeting summaries, sentiment analysis, AI card grouping, monthly reports, customizable health checks and an action tracker. ISO 27001 is held at the vendor level; SOC 2 is described as compliance on SOC 2-certified infrastructure rather than a published Reetro-level Type 2 audit.

Full review →

Summary

NimbleRetro scores 3.0 overall and is best for small agile teams that want a no-frills retro with built-in root cause analysis and a mobile companion app, especially teams already using the wider NimbleWork (SwiftKanban / Nimble) suite. It offers paid plans from $7/user/mo.

Reetro scores 6.4 overall and is best for small to mid-sized agile teams who want a low-cost, easy retro board with AI summaries, customizable health checks and Jira/Azure DevOps export — with a flat-rate org-wide tier if you outgrow per-team pricing. It offers a free tier.

Reetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Reetro edges ahead with an overall score of 6.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

NimbleRetro
Ease of Use 6.0
Retro Toolkit 4.0
Value 3.0
Fun Factor 3.0
AI & Insights 0.0
Integrations 2.0
Enterprise-grade 3.0
Reetro
Ease of Use 7.5
Retro Toolkit 6.0
Value 9.0
Fun Factor 5.5
AI & Insights 6.0
Integrations 5.0
Enterprise-grade 6.0
Detail NimbleRetro Reetro
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Small Small
Free tier No Yes
Free limit Free trial only; no permanent free tier publicly disclosed for the retro module 3 teams, 9 members per team, 10 active boards/month, 4 columns, 1 health check/month
Starting price $7/user/mo $39/team/mo ($32/team/mo annual); flat $49/mo org-wide on Pro Unlimited
Est. 3 teams × 8 people Quote-only — contact sales Free (within free tier)
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2019
HQ Bengaluru, India Copenhagen, Denmark
Data residency
Languages English only English only
Features 13 41
Integrations 2 7

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability NimbleRetro Reetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering note
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard note
Custom templates note
Anonymous input note
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos note
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps note
Basecamp
ClickUp note
Confluence note
GitHub
GitLab
Jira note
Linear
Microsoft Teams note note
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack note note
Trello note
Security & Privacy
SOC 2 note
GDPR
SSO / SAML note
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises note
Public API note
Webhooks note

NimbleRetro — pros

  • + Structured 5-Why root cause workflow built into the retro flow
  • + Anonymous input and time-bound stages keep retros focused
  • + Native iOS and Android apps for mobile participation
  • + GDPR compliant; sits under NimbleWork's ISO 27001 / SOC umbrella at the platform level

NimbleRetro — cons

  • Only four templates with limited customisation of stages
  • No SSO/SAML, SCIM, or SOC 2 Type 2 attestation specific to the retro product
  • No retro-specific AI (clustering, summaries, sentiment) despite NimbleWork marketing the wider platform as AI-powered
  • Thin direct-integration story for the agile stack — no documented Jira, GitHub, Linear, or Azure DevOps hooks for the retro module
  • Pricing not transparently published; demo-gated

Reetro — pros

  • + Generous free tier with no credit card required — 3 teams, 9 members covers a 24-person org
  • + Flat-rate Pro Unlimited at $49/mo covers the whole org — strong value if you outgrow per-team pricing
  • + AI summaries, sentiment analysis, AI card grouping and monthly reports included on paid
  • + Customizable team health checks, polls and a happiness index
  • + ISO 27001 certified at the vendor level, plus audit logs and a public trust center; on-premises available on the Business tier

Reetro — cons

  • Free plan capped at 3 teams, 9 members, 10 boards/month and 4 columns, with anonymity now paid-only
  • Per-team Pro pricing rose to $39/team/mo ($32 annual); the cheapest path for scale is the flat Pro Unlimited
  • Voting is essentially thumbs up/down — no vote-on-ideas-in-groups
  • No published Reetro-level SOC 2 Type 2 audit (compliance rests on SOC 2-certified infrastructure)
  • No public changelog or release notes — hard to verify what's shipped recently from the outside
  • No planning poker, whiteboard, presentation mode, native mobile app, or GitHub/Linear integrations
← All comparisons