Retrospective Tools

NimbleRetro vs TeamRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

NimbleRetro logo

NimbleRetro

3.0

Time-boxed retros with 5-Why root cause analysis

NimbleRetro is the retrospective module inside NimbleWork's broader Nimble agile platform. It runs structured, time-bound retros through Icebreaker, Ideation, Grouping, Voting, and Root Cause Analysis stages, with anonymous input, action item tracking, and a 5-Why root cause workflow. Native iOS and Android apps complement the web product, and action items convert directly into Nimble workitems (user stories and cards).

Full review →
TeamRetro logo

TeamRetro

8.2

Retrospectives, health checks and agile estimations in one suite

TeamRetro pairs structured retrospectives with longitudinal team health checks and planning-poker estimations, aimed at agile organisations running multiple teams under a coach or programme.

Full review →

Summary

NimbleRetro scores 3.0 overall and is best for small agile teams that want a no-frills retro with built-in root cause analysis and a mobile companion app, especially teams already using the wider NimbleWork (SwiftKanban / Nimble) suite. It offers paid plans from ~$7/user/mo (est.).

TeamRetro scores 8.2 overall and is best for agile coaches and engineering managers running ongoing health-check programmes alongside sprint retros. It offers paid plans from $25/mo.

TeamRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, TeamRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.2. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

NimbleRetro
Ease of Use6.0
Retro Toolkit4.0
Value3.0
Fun Factor3.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations2.0
Open Platform3.0
Enterprise-grade3.0
TeamRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit9.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights8.0
Integrations9.0
Open Platform7.0
Enterprise-grade9.5
DetailNimbleRetroTeamRetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallAny
Free tierNoNo
Free limitFree trial only; no permanent free tier publicly disclosed for the retro module30-day free trial, no credit card required
Starting price~$7/user/mo (est.)$25/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 peopleQuote-only — contact sales (~$7/user/mo would be ~$168/mo for 24 users)$50/mo billed annually (Small Organization plan — a 3-team bundle, cheaper than 3 × Single Team)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded2017
HQBengaluru, IndiaAustralia
Data residencyUnited States · European Union
LanguagesEnglish only30 (English, Arabic, Bengali, …)
Export formatsExcel · CSV · PDF · Markdown · Email
Features1365
Integrations215

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityNimbleRetroTeamRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboardnote
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAML
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001note
On-premises
Public APInotenote
Webhooksnotenote
MCP servernote

NimbleRetro — pros

  • + Structured 5-Why root cause workflow built into the retro flow
  • + Anonymous input and time-bound stages keep retros focused
  • + Native iOS and Android apps for mobile participation
  • + GDPR compliant; sits under NimbleWork's ISO 27001 / SOC umbrella at the platform level

NimbleRetro — cons

  • Only four templates, with stage flexibility limited to column count
  • No SSO/SAML, SCIM, or SOC 2 Type 2 attestation specific to the retro product
  • Vendor now markets 'Generative AI' but no concrete retro AI (clustering, summaries, sentiment) is documented — treat as unverified
  • Thin direct-integration story for the agile stack — no documented Jira, GitHub, Linear, or Azure DevOps hooks for the retro module
  • Participants are limited to members of the Nimble project the retro is created from
  • Pricing not transparently published; demo-gated (third parties peg it around $8/user/mo)

TeamRetro — pros

  • + Health checks with custom models, longitudinal tracking and cross-team reporting
  • + Three modules in one suite (retros, health checks, planning poker)
  • + Complete enterprise stack: SAML SSO, SCIM and audit logs, SOC 2 Type 2 held directly, US/EU data residency
  • + AI grouping, template suggestions, action items and sentiment built in
  • + Broad agile-tool integrations including Jira, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence

TeamRetro — cons

  • No free tier — 30-day trial only, then a paid plan is required
  • SCIM provisioning and the full account-level Read/Write API stay Enterprise-only
  • ISO 27001 is inherited via AWS, not held directly
  • Data residency limited to US and EU (no APAC region)

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.