Retrospective Tools

Neatro vs SprintRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Neatro logo

Neatro

5.1

Structured retros built around psychological safety

Neatro runs retrospectives through a guided four-step framework with anonymous brainstorming, ROTI feedback, and Team Radar health checks aimed at distributed agile teams.

Full review →
SprintRetro logo

SprintRetro

4.4

Free sprint retros, embedded in Jira

SprintRetro is a free Atlassian Forge app from Agile Pulse that runs sprint retrospectives directly inside Jira Cloud. It pulls live sprint metrics (velocity, predictability, scope change, carryover, cycle time) into a collaborative retro board and — since a mid-2026 expansion — adds an infinite whiteboard, anonymous team-health pulse checks, timers, and an AI facilitator, alongside templates, anonymous voting, action items that carry over between retros, GIFs, kudos, polls, and icebreakers. A separate paid Pro listing exists for advanced features.

Full review →

Summary

Neatro scores 5.1 overall and is best for scrum Masters who want a guided, safety-first facilitation flow with built-in team health tracking. It offers a free tier.

SprintRetro scores 4.4 overall and is best for scrum teams already living in Jira Cloud who want a no-cost, no-friction sprint retro tool with sprint metrics baked in. It offers a free tier.

Neatro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade. SprintRetro leads on value, fun factor and AI & insights.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Neatro edges ahead with an overall score of 5.1. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Neatro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor5.5
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade4.5
SprintRetro
Ease of Use7.5
Retro Toolkit5.5
Value9.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations3.0
Open Platform0.0
Enterprise-grade2.0
DetailNeatroSprintRetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limitFree forever for up to 10 members, unlimited retrospectives, 70+ templates, 30-day data historyFree for unlimited users on a Jira instance (free app listing)
Starting price$23.20/team/moFree
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$69.60/mo billed annually (3 teams x Premium)Free (within free tier)
EnterpriseYesNo
Founded2020
HQQuebec, CanadaWaterlooville, United Kingdom
Data residencyCanada
Languages2 (English, French)English only
Export formatsPDF · CSV · Jira
Features2521
Integrations51

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityNeatroSprintRetro
Features
AI Summariesnote
AI grouping/clusteringnote
AI action itemsnote
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checksnote
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks
MCP server

Neatro — pros

  • + Guided four-step framework that reliably produces psychological safety
  • + Team Radar is a proper recurring health check, not a repurposed template
  • + Automatic ROTI survey on every retro closes the feedback loop
  • + Action carryover and a Kanban tracker keep follow-through visible between sessions
  • + Generous free tier (up to 10 members, 70+ templates) and active blog/facilitation content

Neatro — cons

  • No native Slack or Microsoft Teams integration for notifications or reminders
  • No AI features at all — no clustering, summaries, sentiment, or action-item extraction
  • Per-team pricing model gets awkward as the org scales beyond a handful of squads
  • Not independently SOC 2, ISO 27001 or GDPR certified — relies on Azure's underlying certifications
  • No cross-team rollups, org-level dashboard, SCIM, or audit logs

SprintRetro — pros

  • + Genuinely free with unlimited users on your Jira instance (free app listing)
  • + Pulls <strong>real sprint metrics</strong> (velocity, predictability, scope change, carryover, cycle time) into the retro context
  • + Built on Atlassian Forge — runs entirely inside Jira Cloud, no external data egress
  • + Expanded fast: now adds an infinite whiteboard, timers, anonymous team-health pulse checks, and an AI facilitator
  • + Action items carry over automatically into the next retro for follow-up

SprintRetro — cons

  • Jira Cloud only — no Slack, Teams, GitHub, Linear, Confluence, or standalone web app
  • AI facilitation is thin and may be gated behind the paid <strong>Pro</strong> listing (~$210/yr for 25 Jira users) — the feature split between free and Pro isn't clearly documented
  • No async mode, presentation mode, drag-and-drop grouping, or scheduled/recurring retros
  • No SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, audit logs, or cross-team reporting
  • Young product (launched Sept 2025); ~682 free-app installs — fine for one team, less proven at scale

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.