Retrospective Tools

Ludi vs ScatterSpoke

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Ludi logo

Ludi

5.7

Playful collaborative whiteboard for agile teams

Ludi (formerly Metro Retro, rebranded August 2025) is a visual agile collaboration whiteboard with 100+ templates spanning retros, planning poker, icebreakers and futurespectives. Its signature illustrated canvas and gadgets make ceremonies feel engaging, and a first AI feature — sticky-note clustering — shipped February 2026.

Full review →
ScatterSpoke logo

ScatterSpoke

6.6

AI copilot for team feedback

ScatterSpoke is an AI-powered feedback platform that turns retrospectives, standups and team feedback into themes, sentiment metrics and prioritised action items for engineering leaders.

Full review →

Summary

Ludi scores 5.7 overall and is best for agile teams who want retros, planning and workshops to feel visual and fun, with a solid Jira-backed delivery loop. It offers paid plans from $4/user/mo billed annually.

ScatterSpoke scores 6.6 overall and is best for engineering orgs in Jira/Slack that want AI to surface themes and impact across many retros. It offers a free tier.

Ludi leads on ease of use and fun factor. ScatterSpoke leads on retro toolkit, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, ScatterSpoke edges ahead with an overall score of 6.6. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Ludi
Ease of Use 8.5
Retro Toolkit 6.0
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 9.0
AI & Insights 2.0
Integrations 3.0
Enterprise-grade 3.5
ScatterSpoke
Ease of Use 8.0
Retro Toolkit 7.0
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 4.0
AI & Insights 8.5
Integrations 5.0
Enterprise-grade 6.0
Detail Ludi ScatterSpoke
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Small Mid-market
Free tier No Yes
Free limit 30-day free trial; boards become read-only when the trial expires 1 team, 10 users, unlimited retros, 20 AI reports/month, 90-day history
Starting price $4/user/mo billed annually $50/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $96/mo billed annually $50/mo
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2020 2014
HQ UK USA
Data residency European Union
Languages English only English only
Features 33 29
Integrations 1 3

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Ludi ScatterSpoke
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering note
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling note
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input note
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos note
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira note
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2 note note
GDPR
SSO / SAML note note
SCIM provisioning note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks

Ludi — pros

  • + Genuinely delightful, illustrated UI that energises in-person and remote retros
  • + Broad template library (100+) covering retros, icebreakers, planning poker, futurespectives, planning and estimation
  • + Solid two-way Jira integration: backlog refinement, estimation and issue creation in-board
  • + Facilitator controls, private writing mode and shareable team spaces
  • + First AI feature shipped Feb 2026 — Sort into Topics auto-groups stickies into labelled topics
  • + EU-hosted (Amsterdam) and GDPR-aligned (SOC 2 / ISO 27001 sit at the Digital Ocean infrastructure layer, not Ludi)

Ludi — cons

  • No async retro mode, no recurring or scheduled retros
  • No team health check or longitudinal pulse product; mood/radar work via whiteboard templates only
  • Integrations limited to Jira — no Slack, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • AI limited to one clustering feature — no summaries, action-item extraction, sentiment or coaching
  • No ongoing free plan; expired trials become read-only
  • SSO gated to a paid/Enterprise plan; no SCIM or audit logs advertised

ScatterSpoke — pros

  • + AI themes, sentiment scoring and impact analysis across retros
  • + 20+ retro formats plus custom formats with real-time collaboration
  • + Cross-team goals, metrics and executive-style rollups
  • + Action items sync to Jira; standups and async feedback included

ScatterSpoke — cons

  • Integration coverage is narrow (Jira, Slack, Teams only)
  • No native health checks, team radars or mood tracking
  • Tier-based pricing jumps sharply ($0 to $50 to $500/mo)
  • SAML/OIDC SSO and SCIM are Enterprise tier only; Business gets social logins + MFA
← All comparisons