Retrospective Tools

Spreo vs Retrium

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Spreo logo

Spreo

5.3

Playful collaborative whiteboard for agile teams

Spreo (formerly Metro Retro, then Ludi — renamed Spreo on 1 July 2026 for trademark reasons) is a visual agile collaboration whiteboard with 100+ templates spanning retros, planning poker, icebreakers and futurespectives. Its signature illustrated canvas and gadgets make ceremonies feel engaging, and a first AI feature — sticky-note clustering — shipped February 2026.

Full review →
Retrium logo

Retrium

4.6

Guided retrospectives and Team Radars for scrum and agile teams

Retrium is a long-running, retrospectives-only tool that emphasises guided five-phase facilitation, anonymous brainstorming, voting, a persistent action plan, and Team Radar health checks for distributed teams.

Full review →

Summary

Spreo scores 5.3 overall and is best for agile teams who want retros, planning and workshops to feel visual and fun, with a solid Jira-backed delivery loop. It offers paid plans from $4/user/mo.

Retrium scores 4.6 overall and is best for scrum masters and agile coaches who want a focused, retro-only tool with strong facilitation guardrails and a built-in Team Radar. It offers paid plans from $39/mo.

Spreo leads on value, fun factor, AI & insights and open platform. Retrium leads on retro toolkit and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, Spreo edges ahead with an overall score of 5.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Spreo
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit6.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor9.0
AI & Insights2.0
Integrations3.0
Open Platform2.0
Enterprise-grade3.5
Retrium
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value6.0
Fun Factor4.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations3.0
Open Platform1.0
Enterprise-grade6.5
DetailSpreoRetrium
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallMid-market
Free tierNoNo
Free limit30-day free trial; boards become read-only when the trial expires30-day free trial (column techniques and Team Radar), no credit card required
Starting price$4/user/mo$39/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$96/mo billed annually$117/mo
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20202014
HQUKWashington, D.C., USA
Data residencyEuropean Union
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsPDF · CSV · HTML · Markdown · JSON · JiraCSV · Jira
Features3323
Integrations12

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilitySpreoRetrium
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clusteringnote
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Pollingnote
Action dashboardnote
Custom templates
Anonymous inputnote
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudosnote
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranotenote
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnotenote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks
MCP server

Spreo — pros

  • + Genuinely delightful, illustrated UI that energises in-person and remote retros
  • + Broad template library (100+) covering retros, icebreakers, planning poker, futurespectives, planning and estimation
  • + Solid two-way Jira integration: backlog refinement, estimation and issue creation in-board
  • + Facilitator controls, private writing mode and shareable team spaces
  • + First AI feature shipped Feb 2026 — Sort into Topics auto-groups stickies into labelled topics
  • + EU-hosted (Amsterdam) and GDPR-aligned (SOC 2 / ISO 27001 sit at the Digital Ocean infrastructure layer, not Spreo)

Spreo — cons

  • No async retro mode, no recurring or scheduled retros
  • No team health check or longitudinal pulse product; mood/radar work via whiteboard templates only
  • Integrations limited to Jira — no Slack, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • AI limited to one clustering feature — no summaries, action-item extraction, sentiment or coaching
  • No ongoing free plan; expired trials become read-only
  • SSO gated to a paid/Enterprise plan; no SCIM or audit logs advertised

Retrium — pros

  • + Battle-tested five-phase guided facilitation flow
  • + Anonymous brainstorming and grouping by design
  • + Persistent team-room action plan that carries forward between retros
  • + Team Radar covers psychological safety and custom health checks
  • + Per-team-room pricing with unlimited users on every plan

Retrium — cons

  • No free tier; 30-day trial only
  • Integrations are thin beyond Jira Cloud and a <em>still-beta</em> Slack app
  • <strong>No AI features at all</strong> — no summary, clustering, action-item extraction or insights
  • No native Microsoft Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear or Confluence integration
  • Public shipping cadence has slowed — no 2025 changelog or product blog activity visible
  • Retro-only scope; no planning poker, kudos, icebreakers or whiteboard

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.