Retrospective Tools

IdeaBoardz vs Reetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

IdeaBoardz logo

IdeaBoardz

2.9

Free shared brainstorming boards

IdeaBoardz is a long-standing free brainstorming and retrospective board where anyone can spin up a shared URL, add ideas in customisable sections, vote, and export to PDF or Excel. The site is still online and the app still works, but the product appears to be in maintenance mode at best — Terms were last updated in April 2020 and there is no blog, changelog or roadmap to suggest active development.

Full review →
Reetro logo

Reetro

6.4

Fun, easy and AI-powered online retrospectives

Reetro is a lightweight retrospective tool with a generous free tier and AI-powered paid tiers covering meeting summaries, sentiment analysis, AI card grouping, monthly reports, customizable health checks and an action tracker. ISO 27001 is held at the vendor level; SOC 2 is described as compliance on SOC 2-certified infrastructure rather than a published Reetro-level Type 2 audit.

Full review →

Summary

IdeaBoardz scores 2.9 overall and is best for throwaway retros and quick distributed brainstorms when nobody wants to sign up. It offers a free tier.

Reetro scores 6.4 overall and is best for small to mid-sized agile teams who want a low-cost, easy retro board with AI summaries, customizable health checks and Jira/Azure DevOps export — with a flat-rate org-wide tier if you outgrow per-team pricing. It offers a free tier.

Reetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Reetro edges ahead with an overall score of 6.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

IdeaBoardz
Ease of Use 6.0
Retro Toolkit 2.0
Value 9.0
Fun Factor 2.0
AI & Insights 0.0
Integrations 0.0
Enterprise-grade 1.0
Reetro
Ease of Use 7.5
Retro Toolkit 6.0
Value 9.0
Fun Factor 5.5
AI & Insights 6.0
Integrations 5.0
Enterprise-grade 6.0
Detail IdeaBoardz Reetro
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Small Small
Free tier Yes Yes
Free limit Fully free, no paid tier 3 teams, 9 members per team, 10 active boards/month, 4 columns, 1 health check/month
Starting price Free $39/team/mo ($32/team/mo annual); flat $49/mo org-wide on Pro Unlimited
Est. 3 teams × 8 people Free (no paid tier) Free (within free tier)
Enterprise No Yes
Founded 2012 2019
HQ Pune, India Copenhagen, Denmark
Data residency
Languages English only English only
Features 7 41
Integrations 0 7

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability IdeaBoardz Reetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering note
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates note note
Anonymous input note
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos note
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps note
Basecamp
ClickUp note
Confluence note
GitHub
GitLab
Jira note
Linear
Microsoft Teams note
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack note
Trello note
Security & Privacy
SOC 2 note
GDPR
SSO / SAML note
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises note
Public API
Webhooks

IdeaBoardz — pros

  • + Genuinely free, no paywall, no paid tier
  • + No signup required to participate — just share a URL
  • + 1-10 customisable sections cover most retro formats (Start/Stop/Continue, 4Ls, etc.)
  • + PDF and Excel export built in
  • + Voting and async input out of the box

IdeaBoardz — cons

  • UI is unchanged from the early 2010s and shows it
  • No timer, no facilitation phases, no drag-and-drop grouping
  • Zero integrations with the agile stack (Jira, Slack, Teams, Confluence, etc.)
  • Only a few starter board presets; no real template library, no health checks, no AI features
  • Boards are public-by-URL with no SSO, SOC 2, or stated privacy controls
  • Apparently in maintenance mode — Terms last updated April 2020, no changelog or blog

Reetro — pros

  • + Generous free tier with no credit card required — 3 teams, 9 members covers a 24-person org
  • + Flat-rate Pro Unlimited at $49/mo covers the whole org — strong value if you outgrow per-team pricing
  • + AI summaries, sentiment analysis, AI card grouping and monthly reports included on paid
  • + Customizable team health checks, polls and a happiness index
  • + ISO 27001 certified at the vendor level, plus audit logs and a public trust center; on-premises available on the Business tier

Reetro — cons

  • Free plan capped at 3 teams, 9 members, 10 boards/month and 4 columns, with anonymity now paid-only
  • Per-team Pro pricing rose to $39/team/mo ($32 annual); the cheapest path for scale is the flat Pro Unlimited
  • Voting is essentially thumbs up/down — no vote-on-ideas-in-groups
  • No published Reetro-level SOC 2 Type 2 audit (compliance rests on SOC 2-certified infrastructure)
  • No public changelog or release notes — hard to verify what's shipped recently from the outside
  • No planning poker, whiteboard, presentation mode, native mobile app, or GitHub/Linear integrations
← All comparisons