Retrospective Tools

GoRetro vs IdeaBoardz

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

GoRetro logo

GoRetro

5.2

Make every sprint impactful, efficient, and fun

GoRetro is a sprint-centric retro and estimation suite combining retrospectives, planning poker, capacity planning and a Jira-fed sprint monitor, with a limited free plan and flat per-team paid pricing.

Full review →
IdeaBoardz logo

IdeaBoardz

3.1

Free shared brainstorming boards

IdeaBoardz is a long-standing free brainstorming and retrospective board: pick one of five presets (Retrospective, Star Fish, Six Thinking Hats, Pros and Cons, Todos) or name your own 1-10 sections, share the URL, add ideas anonymously, upvote, and export to PDF or Excel. The app still works and is still in daily use, but development stopped years ago — the public source repository's last feature commits date to April 2020 and the Terms have not been revised since.

Full review →

Summary

GoRetro scores 5.2 overall and is best for scrum teams that live in Jira and want a polished retro plus planning-poker bundle priced per team, and can live without an active roadmap. It offers a free tier.

IdeaBoardz scores 3.1 overall and is best for throwaway retros and quick distributed brainstorms when nobody wants to sign up. It offers a free tier.

GoRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade. IdeaBoardz leads on value and open platform.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, GoRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 5.2. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

GoRetro
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit6.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor7.0
AI & Insights1.0
Integrations4.0
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade5.0
IdeaBoardz
Ease of Use6.5
Retro Toolkit3.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor2.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations0.0
Open Platform3.0
Enterprise-grade1.0
DetailGoRetroIdeaBoardz
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeAnySmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limitFree plan: 1 team, 5 public boards, 2 team boards per 31-day cycle, 3 columns per board, unlimited users and guests, 20+ templates. Excludes exports, retro analytics, Jira sync, happiness index, polls, icebreakers and action-item management. No longer listed on the pricing page — you land on it when the 30-day trial ends.Fully free, no paid tier
Starting price$29/team/moFree
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$87/mo (Premium, 3 teams, billed annually; $105/mo billed monthly)Free (no paid tier)
EnterpriseYesNo
Founded20202010
HQIsraelPune, India
Data residencyUnited States
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsPDF · CSV · ImagePDF · Excel
Features3510
Integrations20

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityGoRetroIdeaBoardz
Features
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous input
Health Checksnote
Action tracking
Async modenote
Whiteboard
Independent voting
Pollingnote
Icebreaker games
Agile Estimationsnote
Team Kudosnote
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
AI Summaries
Team Insights
In-meeting AI assistant
Action dashboardnote
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2note
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001note
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooks
MCP server

GoRetro — pros

  • + Flat per-team pricing ($29/team/mo annual) with unlimited members per team, plus a genuinely free plan for one team
  • + Polished, real-time facilitation UX with per-board anonymity toggles (hide author, hide cards, hide votes) and drag-to-merge grouping
  • + Bundles planning poker, capacity calculator and a Jira sprint monitor with retros
  • + Real engagement extras — Giphy picker on cards, an optional kudos column, icebreakers, polls and a happiness index
  • + Tight Jira Cloud integration; action items push through to Slack

GoRetro — cons

  • <strong>Effectively in maintenance mode</strong> — the production app was last built 9 Feb 2025, the changelog stopped 23 May 2023 and the blog 28 Jul 2023, and two features are still badged "coming soon" from that era
  • <em>No AI anywhere in the shipped app</em> — no clustering, summarisation or sentiment analysis; the .ai is a domain, not a capability
  • Integration breadth is narrow — Jira and Slack only, with no native MS Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence or Trello
  • No public API or webhooks; exports capped at PDF/CSV/PNG; US-only hosting with no EU residency option
  • The security page contradicts its own hero: SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 are billed as certified up top and "pending audit" in the detail row

IdeaBoardz — pros

  • + Genuinely free — no paywall, no paid tier, no trial clock
  • + No signup required to participate — just share the URL
  • + Five one-click presets (Retrospective, Star Fish, Six Thinking Hats, Pros and Cons, Todos), or type your own 1-10 section titles
  • + Drag one sticky onto another to merge them; the votes are added together
  • + PDF and Excel export on every board, plus a working phone view

IdeaBoardz — cons

  • The presets only pre-fill column titles — there is no timer, no phases and no facilitator flow behind them
  • No action-item tracking, no owners, no due dates, no carry-over between boards
  • Unlimited anonymous upvotes with no per-person vote budget
  • Zero integrations, no SSO, no SOC 2 and no published privacy policy — the URL is the only access control
  • No product work since April 2020; support is a Gmail address and a Twitter handle

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.