Retrospective Tools

GoRetro vs TeamRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

GoRetro logo

GoRetro

5.2

Make every sprint impactful, efficient, and fun

GoRetro is a sprint-centric retro and estimation suite combining retrospectives, planning poker, capacity planning and a Jira-fed sprint monitor, with a limited free plan and flat per-team paid pricing.

Full review →
TeamRetro logo

TeamRetro

8.7

Retrospectives, health checks and agile estimations in one suite

TeamRetro pairs structured retrospectives with longitudinal team health checks and planning-poker estimations, aimed at agile organisations running multiple teams under a coach or programme. An in-meeting AI assistant (trAI) and a GA MCP server sit on top of all paid plans.

Full review →

Summary

GoRetro scores 5.2 overall and is best for scrum teams that live in Jira and want a polished retro plus planning-poker bundle priced per team, and can live without an active roadmap. It offers a free tier.

TeamRetro scores 8.7 overall and is best for agile coaches and engineering managers running ongoing health-check programmes alongside sprint retros. It offers paid plans from $20.83/mo billed annually ($25/mo billed monthly) — Single Team, 1 team, 25 members.

TeamRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, TeamRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.7. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

GoRetro
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit6.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor7.0
AI & Insights1.0
Integrations4.0
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade5.0
TeamRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit9.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor8.5
AI & Insights8.5
Integrations9.0
Open Platform9.0
Enterprise-grade8.5
DetailGoRetroTeamRetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeAnyAny
Free tierYesNo
Free limitFree plan: 1 team, 5 public boards, 2 team boards per 31-day cycle, 3 columns per board, unlimited users and guests, 20+ templates. Excludes exports, retro analytics, Jira sync, happiness index, polls, icebreakers and action-item management. No longer listed on the pricing page — you land on it when the 30-day trial ends.No free plan — 30-day trial, no credit card required
Starting price$29/team/mo$20.83/mo billed annually ($25/mo billed monthly) — Single Team, 1 team, 25 members
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$87/mo (Premium, 3 teams, billed annually; $105/mo billed monthly)$50/mo billed annually ($60/mo billed monthly) — Small Organization plan, a 3-team bundle with unlimited members
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20202017
HQIsraelAustralia
Data residencyUnited StatesUnited States · European Union
LanguagesEnglish only29 (English, Arabic, Bengali, …)
Export formatsPDF · CSV · ImageExcel · CSV · PDF · Markdown · Email · Image
Features3568
Integrations215

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityGoRetroTeamRetro
Features
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Health Checksnote
Action tracking
Async modenote
Whiteboard
Independent voting
Pollingnote
Icebreaker gamesnote
Agile Estimationsnote
Team Kudosnote
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
AI Summaries
Team Insights
In-meeting AI assistantnote
Action dashboardnote
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2notenote
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001notenote
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooks
MCP server

GoRetro — pros

  • + Flat per-team pricing ($29/team/mo annual) with unlimited members per team, plus a genuinely free plan for one team
  • + Polished, real-time facilitation UX with per-board anonymity toggles (hide author, hide cards, hide votes) and drag-to-merge grouping
  • + Bundles planning poker, capacity calculator and a Jira sprint monitor with retros
  • + Real engagement extras — Giphy picker on cards, an optional kudos column, icebreakers, polls and a happiness index
  • + Tight Jira Cloud integration; action items push through to Slack

GoRetro — cons

  • <strong>Effectively in maintenance mode</strong> — the production app was last built 9 Feb 2025, the changelog stopped 23 May 2023 and the blog 28 Jul 2023, and two features are still badged "coming soon" from that era
  • <em>No AI anywhere in the shipped app</em> — no clustering, summarisation or sentiment analysis; the .ai is a domain, not a capability
  • Integration breadth is narrow — Jira and Slack only, with no native MS Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence or Trello
  • No public API or webhooks; exports capped at PDF/CSV/PNG; US-only hosting with no EU residency option
  • The security page contradicts its own hero: SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 are billed as certified up top and "pending audit" in the detail row

TeamRetro — pros

  • + Health checks and maturity models as a first-class module — custom dimensions, radar charts, trends across sprints
  • + Three modules on one subscription: retrospectives, health checks, planning-poker estimation
  • + SAML SSO, RBAC and US-or-EU hosting on <em>every</em> plan, not just Enterprise
  • + GA MCP server, team-level API keys and HMAC-signed webhooks on all plans; 15 native agile-stack integrations plus Zapier and n8n
  • + <em>trAI</em> in-meeting assistant on trial and paid plans, plus 12 native in-meeting icebreaker games on every account

TeamRetro — cons

  • No free tier — 30-day trial, then a paid plan
  • The SOC 2 Type 2 report is Enterprise-only; lower tiers get the SOC 3 report instead
  • SCIM, IP allowlisting, domain capture and guest/observer roles are Enterprise-only, and audit logs are on request rather than self-serve
  • Cross-team insights, reports and programs (team-of-teams) require Enterprise
  • ISO 27001 is inherited from AWS, and hosting is US or EU only — no APAC region despite the Australian HQ

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.