Retrospective Tools

FigJam vs GoRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

FigJam logo

FigJam

7.3

Figma's whiteboard with AI sticky clustering, an official MCP server that reaches FigJam boards, and a $3 Collab seat — free tier caps at 3 boards

FigJam is the whiteboard product inside Figma — sticky notes, timer, music, expressive cursor stamps, voting sessions, an AI co-pilot that sorts and summarises stickies, and 300+ ready-made templates including community retro boards. Design and product teams already living in Figma get retros without buying a second tool, backed by Figma's SAML/SCIM, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and Enterprise data residency in the EU, Australia, India and Brazil. Figma's official MCP server reads and writes FigJam boards on every plan, including free. Voting sessions, open guest sessions, audio chat and webhooks all require a paid team; publishing custom templates requires Organization.

Full review →
GoRetro logo

GoRetro

5.2

Make every sprint impactful, efficient, and fun

GoRetro is a sprint-centric retro and estimation suite combining retrospectives, planning poker, capacity planning and a Jira-fed sprint monitor, with a limited free plan and flat per-team paid pricing.

Full review →

Summary

FigJam scores 7.3 overall and is best for design and product teams already on Figma who want retros on the same platform as their design files, with playful engagement, AI sticky clustering and an agent-accessible canvas. It offers a free tier.

GoRetro scores 5.2 overall and is best for scrum teams that live in Jira and want a polished retro plus planning-poker bundle priced per team, and can live without an active roadmap. It offers a free tier.

FigJam leads on fun factor, AI & insights, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade. GoRetro leads on ease of use and retro toolkit.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, FigJam edges ahead with an overall score of 7.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

FigJam
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit4.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor9.0
AI & Insights5.0
Integrations6.0
Open Platform9.5
Enterprise-grade9.5
GoRetro
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit6.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor7.0
AI & Insights1.0
Integrations4.0
Open Platform1.5
Enterprise-grade5.0
DetailFigJamGoRetro
CategoryWhiteboardRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketAny
Free tierYesYes
Free limitStarter: 3 FigJam files per team (unlimited personal drafts), 150 AI credits/day up to 500/month, 300+ templates, timer, music, AI Sort/Summarize/Generate, REST API and 20 MCP tool calls/month, 30-day version history — no voting sessions, audio chat, open (no-account) sessions or webhooksFree plan: 1 team, 5 public boards, 2 team boards per 31-day cycle, 3 columns per board, unlimited users and guests, 20+ templates. Excludes exports, retro analytics, Jira sync, happiness index, polls, icebreakers and action-item management. No longer listed on the pricing page — you land on it when the 30-day trial ends.
Starting price$3/user/mo$29/team/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$72/mo (24 Collab seats × $3, billed annually; $120/mo billed monthly at $5) — more if facilitators need $16 Full seats$87/mo (Premium, 3 teams, billed annually; $105/mo billed monthly)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20122020
HQSan Francisco, USIsrael
Data residencyUnited States · European Union · Australia · IN · BRUnited States
Languages7 (English, Japanese, Korean, …)English only
Export formatsPDF · Image · CSVPDF · CSV · Image
Features4035
Integrations102

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityFigJamGoRetro
Features
Custom templates✓note✓
Anonymous input—✓
Health Checks—✓note
Action tracking—✓
Async mode✓✓note
Whiteboard✓—
Independent voting✓note✓
Polling✓✓note
Icebreaker games——
Agile Estimations✓note✓note
Team Kudos✓note✓note
AI grouping/clustering✓—
AI action items✓note—
AI Summaries✓—
Team Insights——
In-meeting AI assistant✓—
Action dashboard—✓note
Integrations
Asana✓note—
Azure DevOps——
Basecamp——
ClickUp——
Confluence✓note—
GitHub✓note—
GitLab——
Jira✓note✓note
Linear✓note—
Microsoft Teams✓note—
Monday.com✓note—
Notion✓note—
Shortcut——
Slack✓note✓note
Trello✓note—
Security & Privacy
SOC 2✓✓note
GDPR✓✓
SSO / SAML✓note✓note
SCIM provisioning✓note—
ISO 27001✓✓note
On-premises——
Public API✓—
Webhooks✓—
MCP server✓—

FigJam — pros

  • + Cheap $3/user/mo Collab seat unlocks unlimited boards without a full Figma editor seat
  • + Free Starter tier includes real AI credits (150/day, 500/month), 300+ templates, the timer, music and AI Sort/Summarize
  • + Playful, engaging UX — stamps, emotes, high-fives, music, cursor chat — lifts retro fun factor
  • + Best open platform of any whiteboard here: REST API on every plan, webhooks on paid, and an <strong>official MCP server that reads and writes FigJam boards</strong> on all plans
  • + Strong enterprise posture inherited from Figma: SAML, SCIM, activity logs, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and Enterprise data residency in the EU, Australia, India and Brazil

FigJam — cons

  • − No native action-item tracking, recurring retros or health checks
  • − Anonymity is weak — votes reveal who voted once the session ends, and stickies always carry a name
  • − Official connectors embed Figma files in Jira/Confluence/Linear/Notion rather than pushing action items out; GitHub-issue creation is a community widget; no Azure DevOps
  • − Free Starter caps a team at 3 FigJam files and excludes voting, audio chat, no-account guest links and webhooks; publishing custom templates needs Organization
  • − Built primarily for designers — the canvas paradigm is fiddly for structured retros, and large boards get sluggish

GoRetro — pros

  • + Flat per-team pricing ($29/team/mo annual) with unlimited members per team, plus a genuinely free plan for one team
  • + Polished, real-time facilitation UX with per-board anonymity toggles (hide author, hide cards, hide votes) and drag-to-merge grouping
  • + Bundles planning poker, capacity calculator and a Jira sprint monitor with retros
  • + Real engagement extras — Giphy picker on cards, an optional kudos column, icebreakers, polls and a happiness index
  • + Tight Jira Cloud integration; action items push through to Slack

GoRetro — cons

  • − <strong>Effectively in maintenance mode</strong> — the production app was last built 9 Feb 2025, the changelog stopped 23 May 2023 and the blog 28 Jul 2023, and two features are still badged "coming soon" from that era
  • − <em>No AI anywhere in the shipped app</em> — no clustering, summarisation or sentiment analysis; the .ai is a domain, not a capability
  • − Integration breadth is narrow — Jira and Slack only, with no native MS Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence or Trello
  • − No public API or webhooks; exports capped at PDF/CSV/PNG; US-only hosting with no EU residency option
  • − The security page contradicts its own hero: SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 are billed as certified up top and "pending audit" in the detail row

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.