Retrospective Tools

RetroFlow vs TeleRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

RetroFlow logo

RetroFlow

3.7

Your team's favourite way to retro

RetroFlow is a free, no-signup retrospective board built by solo developer Prashant Meena, with colourful boards, real-time collaboration, 7 ready-made templates, anonymous feedback, dot voting and action items. Participants join a shared link in one click with no account; the whole product is free with no paid tiers or locked features.

Full review →
TeleRetro logo

TeleRetro

6.7

Agile retros you'll love

TeleRetro is a remote-first retrospective tool built around team engagement — animated GIF reactions, icebreaker games, music, planning poker and a clean facilitation flow. It now pairs retros with a Pulse Survey module for tracking team health between sessions, aimed at small to mid-size agile teams who want retros that feel lively rather than mechanical.

Full review →

Summary

RetroFlow scores 3.7 overall and is best for small or ad-hoc teams who want a genuinely free, zero-friction retro board they can share with one link — no signup, no payment and no setup, accepting that there are no integrations, AI or enterprise controls. It offers a free tier.

TeleRetro scores 6.7 overall and is best for remote and hybrid agile teams who prioritise engagement and fun alongside a solid retrospective facilitation workflow. It offers a free tier.

RetroFlow leads on value. TeleRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, TeleRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 6.7. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

RetroFlow
Ease of Use8.0
Retro Toolkit3.5
Value9.0
Fun Factor4.5
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations0.0
Enterprise-grade1.0
TeleRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit8.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor8.0
AI & Insights4.0
Integrations6.0
Enterprise-grade4.0
DetailRetroFlowTeleRetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limitEverything is free — all 7 templates, real-time collaboration, anonymous feedback, dot voting and action items, with no account required to join a board1 team, 3 retros, 14-day retro access, 1 pulse survey, limited AI Retro Bot access
Starting priceFree£26/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 peopleFree (no paid tier)£72/mo (~$91/mo) on the Business plan (3 teams)
EnterpriseNoYes
Founded2020
HQUK
Data residency
LanguagesEnglish only14 (English, German, Spanish, …)
Features738
Integrations07

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityRetroFlowTeleRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous inputnote
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checksnote
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHubnote
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notionnote
Shortcut
Slack
Trellonote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooks

RetroFlow — pros

  • + Genuinely free with no paid tiers, no paywalled features and no account required to join a board
  • + Anonymous feedback — participants contribute with no signup, email or PII collected
  • + Three-step setup — pick a template, share the link, run the retro; participants join with one click
  • + Seven ready-made retrospective formats covering the common reflection patterns
  • + Real-time collaboration with live notes, dot voting and shared action items
  • + Light personalisation — custom column names, 2-6 columns, 7 colour palettes and 48 emojis

RetroFlow — cons

  • No integrations at all — nothing pushes to Jira, Linear, Slack, Teams or any agile-stack tool
  • No AI features (clustering, summary, action extraction or sentiment)
  • No health checks, recurring retros, mood tracking or cross-team reporting
  • No enterprise security or compliance — no SOC 2, SSO, SCIM or audit logs; the privacy policy confirms only HTTPS and Vercel hosting with Google Analytics/PostHog analytics
  • Built and run by a solo developer (Prashant Meena) with no support team or SLA — fine for ad-hoc use, but unsuitable for enterprise procurement
  • Boards are private only by unguessable URL — there are no accounts, so no real access control, invite management or board history

TeleRetro — pros

  • + Standout engagement features — GIF reactions, music and icebreaker games make retros genuinely enjoyable
  • + Clean, low-friction facilitation flow with timer, voting, grouping and action items in one place
  • + Pulse Surveys now track team health between retros, with a cross-team dashboard on the Business plan
  • + Async mode and action carry-over keep distributed teams aligned between sprints
  • + AI Retro Bot spins up a custom retro format from any topic in seconds

TeleRetro — cons

  • AI is limited to format and icebreaker generation — no board summary, clustering, action extraction or sentiment
  • Native integrations stop at Jira, Slack and Teams; Trello, GitHub and Azure DevOps run through Zapier
  • No SCIM, audit logs or SOC 2; SSO (Okta/Azure AD) is Enterprise-plan only
  • Health/pulse module is lighter than dedicated health-check tools — no team radars or psych-safety models
  • Annual-only discount and per-team pricing add up beyond a handful of teams
← All comparisons