Retrospective Tools

Metro Retro vs RetroTeam

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Metro Retro logo

Metro Retro

3.0

Rebranded twice — Metro Retro became Ludi, now Spreo; the playful retro whiteboard lives on

Metro Retro was a fun, freeform online whiteboard built for sprint retrospectives, known for its playful templates, timer and engagement features. The product has since been renamed twice by its maker, Deqo Software Limited: to Ludi on 4 August 2025, then to Spreo on 1 July 2026 after a trademark cease-and-desist. The metroretro.io domain now 301-redirects straight to spreo.io. If you are searching for Metro Retro, the product you want is Spreo; the original Metro Retro brand and domain are no longer maintained.

Full review →
RetroTeam logo

RetroTeam

4.6

AI-first retro tool the vendor is winding down

RetroTeam is a focused, AI-first retrospective app — capture, group, vote, act, with Jira hand-off — that its vendor has announced it is winding down while the team moves to an unrelated interview-coaching product.

Full review →

Summary

Metro Retro scores 3.0 overall and is best for searchers who remember Metro Retro and need to know where it went — the product now ships as <strong>Spreo</strong>. Go there, or to a dedicated retro platform, instead. It offers custom pricing.

RetroTeam scores 4.6 overall and is best for nobody adopting today — the vendor has announced it is winding down. Existing teams should export their PDF reports and pick a replacement. It offers a free tier.

Metro Retro leads on fun factor, open platform and enterprise-grade. RetroTeam leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value, AI & insights and integrations.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, RetroTeam edges ahead with an overall score of 4.6. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Metro Retro
Ease of Use5.0
Retro Toolkit4.0
Value3.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations2.0
Open Platform2.0
Enterprise-grade2.0
RetroTeam
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor4.0
AI & Insights6.5
Integrations2.5
Open Platform0.5
Enterprise-grade1.0
DetailMetro RetroRetroTeam
CategoryWhiteboardRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierNoYes
Free limit1 team, 10 users, 10 boards, 10 AI credits
Starting priceFree$10/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 peopleN/A — brand retired; see the Spreo listing$30/mo (Pro — 5 teams, 50 users; Premium's 2-team / 20-user cap doesn't fit 3 teams of 8)
EnterpriseNoYes
Founded2022
HQUnited KingdomOakland, California, US
Data residencyUnited States
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsPDF · CSV · HTML · Markdown · JSON · JiraPDF
Features720
Integrations01

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityMetro RetroRetroTeam
Features
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous input
Health Checks
Action tracking
Async mode
Whiteboard
Independent voting
Polling
Icebreaker games
Agile Estimations
Team Kudos
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
AI Summaries
Team Insights
In-meeting AI assistant
Action dashboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPRnote
SSO / SAML
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks
MCP server

Metro Retro — pros

  • + The product you remember still exists — it now ships as Spreo (Metro Retro → Ludi, 4 Aug 2025 → Spreo, 1 Jul 2026)
  • + The vendor says accounts, boards, data and workflows carried through both renames, and old links redirect
  • + Carried its playful templates, session timer and icebreakers into the rebrand
  • + Freeform whiteboard canvas that's friendly for engagement-first retros

Metro Retro — cons

  • The Metro Retro brand and metroretro.io domain are retired — the domain 301-redirects straight to spreo.io
  • Two name changes in under a year (Metro Retro → Ludi → Spreo) leave stranded searchers chasing a moving target; bookmarks, runbooks and SSO configs all need updating
  • No standalone free tier under the new brand — a 30-day trial, then paid
  • Neither old domain is a clean redirect everywhere: metroretro.io/pricing and ludi.co/pricing both return HTTP 200 with a stale Spreo <em>Non-prod environment</em> stub instead of forwarding (checked 1 Sep 2026)

RetroTeam — pros

  • + Tight, opinionated retro flow — capture, AI group, vote, act — with a timer on every stage
  • + AI grouping suggestions are accept/reject per card, not applied over your head
  • + Flat plan pricing: $30/mo covers 5 teams and 50 users, well under per-seat rivals
  • + Participants join by link with no account required
  • + Org-wide action dashboard with owner, status and due date, plus one-way Jira links

RetroTeam — cons

  • <strong>The vendor has announced RetroTeam is winding down</strong> — the same team has moved to ChannelPulse, an unrelated interview-coaching product
  • No published shutdown date and no migration path; the only export is a PDF report, with no API, webhooks or MCP to pull history out another way
  • Jira is the only integration — no Slack, Teams, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • No health checks, recurring retros, scheduling, async mode or kudos
  • No SSO, SCIM, SOC 2 or audit logs, and hosting is US-only with no EU residency option

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.