Retrospective Tools

Metro Retro vs RetroTeam

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Metro Retro logo

Metro Retro

3.1

Now rebranded as Ludi — the playful retro whiteboard lives on under a new name

Metro Retro was a fun, freeform online whiteboard built for sprint retrospectives, known for its playful templates, timer and engagement features. In 2024 the product was rebranded: metroretro.io now redirects to ludi.co, and the maker (Deqo Software Limited) positions Ludi as the continuation — 'Metro Retro is now Ludi.' If you are searching for Metro Retro, the product you want is Ludi; the original Metro Retro brand and domain are no longer maintained.

Full review →
RetroTeam logo

RetroTeam

5.3

AI retrospective tool for high-performing teams

RetroTeam is a focused, AI-first retrospective app that runs teams through a structured capture, group, vote, and action-items flow with Jira sync.

Full review →

Summary

Metro Retro scores 3.1 overall and is best for searchers looking for Metro Retro — the product now exists as Ludi. Use Ludi (or a dedicated retro tool) instead. It offers custom pricing.

RetroTeam scores 5.3 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams who want lightweight AI-assisted retros and Jira hand-off without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

Metro Retro leads on fun factor and enterprise-grade. RetroTeam leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value, AI & insights and integrations.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, RetroTeam edges ahead with an overall score of 5.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Metro Retro
Ease of Use 5.0
Retro Toolkit 4.0
Value 3.0
Fun Factor 6.0
AI & Insights 0.0
Integrations 2.0
Enterprise-grade 2.0
RetroTeam
Ease of Use 8.5
Retro Toolkit 5.0
Value 9.0
Fun Factor 4.0
AI & Insights 6.5
Integrations 2.5
Enterprise-grade 1.5
Detail Metro Retro RetroTeam
Category Whiteboard Retrospectives
Team size Small Small
Free tier No Yes
Free limit 1 team, 10 users, 10 boards, 10 AI credits
Starting price Free $10/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people N/A — rebranded as Ludi; see the Ludi listing $30/mo
Enterprise No Yes
Founded 2022
HQ United Kingdom
Data residency
Languages English only English only
Features 7 18
Integrations 0 1

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Metro Retro RetroTeam
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling note
Action dashboard
Custom templates note
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAML
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks

Metro Retro — pros

  • + The product you remember still exists — it's now called Ludi
  • + Carried its playful templates, timer, GIFs and icebreakers into the rebrand
  • + Freeform whiteboard canvas that's friendly for engagement-first retros

Metro Retro — cons

  • The Metro Retro brand and metroretro.io domain are retired (the domain now redirects to ludi.co)
  • No standalone free tier under the new brand — Ludi is a 30-day trial then paid
  • Light on the agile stack: no Jira/Slack/Teams integrations, no SSO, no SOC 2, no AI
  • Not a dedicated retro platform — it's a general whiteboard you adapt for retros

RetroTeam — pros

  • + Strong AI grouping and action-item generation
  • + Flat per-team pricing scales well for small squads
  • + Tight, opinionated retro flow (capture, group, vote, act)
  • + Direct Jira sync for action items
  • + Active product — weekly blog cadence through late March 2026
  • + Custom template builder for teams that outgrow the four presets

RetroTeam — cons

  • Integration set is Jira-only; Slack, Teams, GitHub, Linear, Azure DevOps not advertised
  • No health checks, kudos, or longitudinal team-pulse tracking
  • Light on enterprise controls (SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, audit logs not mentioned publicly)
  • AI is credit-gated — Premium ships 50 credits/mo, Pro 150; heavy use forces an upgrade
  • Only 4 built-in templates (custom builder fills the gap, but no template library)
← All comparisons