Retrospective Tools

FigJam vs Metro Retro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

FigJam logo

FigJam

6.9

Figma's whiteboard with AI-assisted clustering, voting and a free tier that includes meaningful AI credits

FigJam is the whiteboard product inside Figma — sticky notes, voting, timer, audio, music, expressive cursor stamps, an AI co-pilot that clusters and summarises sticky notes, and dozens of community retro templates. Sits inside the Figma platform so design and product teams already living there get retros without buying a second tool, with Figma's strong SSO/SCIM and SOC 2 enterprise posture on Org+/Enterprise plans.

Full review →
Metro Retro logo

Metro Retro

3.1

Now rebranded as Ludi — the playful retro whiteboard lives on under a new name

Metro Retro was a fun, freeform online whiteboard built for sprint retrospectives, known for its playful templates, timer and engagement features. In 2024 the product was rebranded: metroretro.io now redirects to ludi.co, and the maker (Deqo Software Limited) positions Ludi as the continuation — 'Metro Retro is now Ludi.' If you are searching for Metro Retro, the product you want is Ludi; the original Metro Retro brand and domain are no longer maintained.

Full review →

Summary

FigJam scores 6.9 overall and is best for design and product teams already on Figma who want retros on the same platform as their design files, with playful engagement and AI clustering. It offers a free tier.

Metro Retro scores 3.1 overall and is best for searchers looking for Metro Retro — the product now exists as Ludi. Use Ludi (or a dedicated retro tool) instead. It offers custom pricing.

FigJam leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, FigJam edges ahead with an overall score of 6.9. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

FigJam
Ease of Use 7.0
Retro Toolkit 4.5
Value 7.0
Fun Factor 9.0
AI & Insights 5.0
Integrations 6.0
Enterprise-grade 9.5
Metro Retro
Ease of Use 5.0
Retro Toolkit 4.0
Value 3.0
Fun Factor 6.0
AI & Insights 0.0
Integrations 2.0
Enterprise-grade 2.0
Detail FigJam Metro Retro
Category Whiteboard Whiteboard
Team size Mid-market Small
Free tier Yes No
Free limit Starter: 3 FigJam boards per team (unlimited personal drafts), 150 AI credits/day (500/month), community templates
Starting price $3/user/mo (Collab seat) Free
Est. 3 teams × 8 people ~$72/mo (24 Collab seats × $3, annual) — more if hosts need Full seats N/A — rebranded as Ludi; see the Ludi listing
Enterprise Yes No
Founded 2012
HQ San Francisco, US United Kingdom
Data residency United States
Languages English only English only
Features 38 7
Integrations 8 0

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability FigJam Metro Retro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items note
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations note
Health Checks
Team Kudos note
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com note
Notion note
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAML note
SCIM provisioning note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks

FigJam — pros

  • + Cheap $3/user/mo Collab seat unlocks unlimited boards without a full Figma editor seat
  • + Free tier includes real AI credits (150/day, 500/month) and the full retro toolkit
  • + Same login and platform as Figma — zero friction for design-led teams
  • + Playful, engaging UX (audio, music, stamps, expressive cursors) lifts retro fun factor
  • + Strong enterprise posture inherited from Figma: SAML, SCIM, SOC 2, ISO 27001

FigJam — cons

  • No native action-item tracking, recurring retros or health checks
  • Anonymous mode is weak — no built-in 'private until reveal' equivalent
  • No Microsoft Teams or Azure DevOps integration
  • Free Starter caps teams at 3 FigJam boards — a recurring retro practice outgrows it fast
  • Built primarily for designers; agile coaches sometimes find the canvas paradigm fiddly for structured retros

Metro Retro — pros

  • + The product you remember still exists — it's now called Ludi
  • + Carried its playful templates, timer, GIFs and icebreakers into the rebrand
  • + Freeform whiteboard canvas that's friendly for engagement-first retros

Metro Retro — cons

  • The Metro Retro brand and metroretro.io domain are retired (the domain now redirects to ludi.co)
  • No standalone free tier under the new brand — Ludi is a 30-day trial then paid
  • Light on the agile stack: no Jira/Slack/Teams integrations, no SSO, no SOC 2, no AI
  • Not a dedicated retro platform — it's a general whiteboard you adapt for retros
← All comparisons