Retrospective Tools

Metro Retro vs RetroFlow

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Metro Retro logo

Metro Retro

3.1

Now rebranded as Ludi — the playful retro whiteboard lives on under a new name

Metro Retro was a fun, freeform online whiteboard built for sprint retrospectives, known for its playful templates, timer and engagement features. In 2024 the product was rebranded: metroretro.io now redirects to ludi.co, and the maker (Deqo Software Limited) positions Ludi as the continuation — 'Metro Retro is now Ludi.' If you are searching for Metro Retro, the product you want is Ludi; the original Metro Retro brand and domain are no longer maintained.

Full review →
RetroFlow logo

RetroFlow

3.7

Your team's favourite way to retro

RetroFlow is a free, no-signup retrospective board built by solo developer Prashant Meena, with colourful boards, real-time collaboration, 7 ready-made templates, anonymous feedback, dot voting and action items. Participants join a shared link in one click with no account; the whole product is free with no paid tiers or locked features.

Full review →

Summary

Metro Retro scores 3.1 overall and is best for searchers looking for Metro Retro — the product now exists as Ludi. Use Ludi (or a dedicated retro tool) instead. It offers custom pricing.

RetroFlow scores 3.7 overall and is best for small or ad-hoc teams who want a genuinely free, zero-friction retro board they can share with one link — no signup, no payment and no setup, accepting that there are no integrations, AI or enterprise controls. It offers a free tier.

Metro Retro leads on retro toolkit, fun factor, integrations and enterprise-grade. RetroFlow leads on ease of use and value.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, RetroFlow edges ahead with an overall score of 3.7. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Metro Retro
Ease of Use5.0
Retro Toolkit4.0
Value3.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations2.0
Enterprise-grade2.0
RetroFlow
Ease of Use8.0
Retro Toolkit3.5
Value9.0
Fun Factor4.5
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations0.0
Enterprise-grade1.0
DetailMetro RetroRetroFlow
CategoryWhiteboardRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierNoYes
Free limitEverything is free — all 7 templates, real-time collaboration, anonymous feedback, dot voting and action items, with no account required to join a board
Starting priceFreeFree
Est. 3 teams × 8 peopleN/A — rebranded as Ludi; see the Ludi listingFree (no paid tier)
EnterpriseNoNo
Founded
HQUnited Kingdom
Data residency
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Features77
Integrations00

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityMetro RetroRetroFlow
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous inputnote
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHub
GitLab
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Monday.com
Notion
Shortcut
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAML
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public API
Webhooks

Metro Retro — pros

  • + The product you remember still exists — it's now called Ludi
  • + Carried its playful templates, timer, GIFs and icebreakers into the rebrand
  • + Freeform whiteboard canvas that's friendly for engagement-first retros

Metro Retro — cons

  • The Metro Retro brand and metroretro.io domain are retired (the domain now redirects to ludi.co)
  • No standalone free tier under the new brand — Ludi is a 30-day trial then paid
  • Light on the agile stack: no Jira/Slack/Teams integrations, no SSO, no SOC 2, no AI
  • Not a dedicated retro platform — it's a general whiteboard you adapt for retros

RetroFlow — pros

  • + Genuinely free with no paid tiers, no paywalled features and no account required to join a board
  • + Anonymous feedback — participants contribute with no signup, email or PII collected
  • + Three-step setup — pick a template, share the link, run the retro; participants join with one click
  • + Seven ready-made retrospective formats covering the common reflection patterns
  • + Real-time collaboration with live notes, dot voting and shared action items
  • + Light personalisation — custom column names, 2-6 columns, 7 colour palettes and 48 emojis

RetroFlow — cons

  • No integrations at all — nothing pushes to Jira, Linear, Slack, Teams or any agile-stack tool
  • No AI features (clustering, summary, action extraction or sentiment)
  • No health checks, recurring retros, mood tracking or cross-team reporting
  • No enterprise security or compliance — no SOC 2, SSO, SCIM or audit logs; the privacy policy confirms only HTTPS and Vercel hosting with Google Analytics/PostHog analytics
  • Built and run by a solo developer (Prashant Meena) with no support team or SLA — fine for ad-hoc use, but unsuitable for enterprise procurement
  • Boards are private only by unguessable URL — there are no accounts, so no real access control, invite management or board history
← All comparisons