Retrospective Tools

Metro Retro vs RetroFlow

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Metro Retro logo

Metro Retro

3.0

Rebranded twice — Metro Retro became Ludi, now Spreo; the playful retro whiteboard lives on

Metro Retro was a fun, freeform online whiteboard built for sprint retrospectives, known for its playful templates, timer and engagement features. The product has since been renamed twice by its maker, Deqo Software Limited: to Ludi on 4 August 2025, then to Spreo on 1 July 2026 after a trademark cease-and-desist. The metroretro.io domain now 301-redirects straight to spreo.io. If you are searching for Metro Retro, the product you want is Spreo; the original Metro Retro brand and domain are no longer maintained.

Full review →
RetroFlow logo

RetroFlow

3.4

Your team's favourite way to retro

RetroFlow is a free, no-signup retrospective board built by solo developer Prashant Meena, with colourful boards, real-time collaboration, 11 ready-made templates plus a custom board builder, anonymous feedback, unrestricted upvoting, drag-to-move between columns, action items and PDF/Excel export. Participants join a shared link in one click with no account; the whole product is free with no paid tiers or locked features. The board is desktop-only — any viewport under 768px is blocked outright.

Full review →

Summary

Metro Retro scores 3.0 overall and is best for searchers who remember Metro Retro and need to know where it went — the product now ships as <strong>Spreo</strong>. Go there, or to a dedicated retro platform, instead. It offers custom pricing.

RetroFlow scores 3.4 overall and is best for small or ad-hoc teams on laptops who want a genuinely free, zero-friction retro board they can share with one link — no signup, no payment and no setup, accepting that there is no timer, no phone support, no integrations, no AI and no enterprise controls. It offers a free tier.

Metro Retro leads on fun factor, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade. RetroFlow leads on ease of use and value.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, RetroFlow edges ahead with an overall score of 3.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Metro Retro
Ease of Use5.0
Retro Toolkit4.0
Value3.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations2.0
Open Platform2.0
Enterprise-grade2.0
RetroFlow
Ease of Use8.0
Retro Toolkit4.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor4.5
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations0.0
Open Platform1.0
Enterprise-grade1.0
DetailMetro RetroRetroFlow
CategoryWhiteboardRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierNoYes
Free limitEverything is free — all 11 templates, custom boards, saved layouts, real-time collaboration, anonymous feedback, unlimited upvoting, action items and PDF/Excel export, with no account required to join a board and no paid tier to upgrade to
Starting priceFreeFree
Est. 3 teams × 8 peopleN/A — brand retired; see the Spreo listingFree (no paid tier)
EnterpriseNoNo
Founded——
HQUnited Kingdom—
Data residency——
LanguagesEnglish onlyEnglish only
Export formatsPDF · CSV · HTML · Markdown · JSON · JiraPDF · Excel
Features78
Integrations00

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityMetro RetroRetroFlow
Features
Custom templates—✓note
Anonymous input—✓note
Health Checks——
Action tracking—✓note
Async mode——
Whiteboard✓—
Independent voting✓✓note
Polling——
Icebreaker games——
Agile Estimations——
Team Kudos——
AI grouping/clustering——
AI action items——
AI Summaries——
Team Insights——
In-meeting AI assistant——
Action dashboard——
Integrations
Asana——
Azure DevOps——
Basecamp——
ClickUp——
Confluence——
GitHub——
GitLab——
Jira——
Linear——
Microsoft Teams——
Monday.com——
Notion——
Shortcut——
Slack——
Trello——
Security & Privacy
SOC 2——
GDPR——
SSO / SAML——
SCIM provisioning——
ISO 27001——
On-premises——
Public API——
Webhooks——
MCP server——

Metro Retro — pros

  • + The product you remember still exists — it now ships as Spreo (Metro Retro → Ludi, 4 Aug 2025 → Spreo, 1 Jul 2026)
  • + The vendor says accounts, boards, data and workflows carried through both renames, and old links redirect
  • + Carried its playful templates, session timer and icebreakers into the rebrand
  • + Freeform whiteboard canvas that's friendly for engagement-first retros

Metro Retro — cons

  • − The Metro Retro brand and metroretro.io domain are retired — the domain 301-redirects straight to spreo.io
  • − Two name changes in under a year (Metro Retro → Ludi → Spreo) leave stranded searchers chasing a moving target; bookmarks, runbooks and SSO configs all need updating
  • − No standalone free tier under the new brand — a 30-day trial, then paid
  • − Neither old domain is a clean redirect everywhere: metroretro.io/pricing and ludi.co/pricing both return HTTP 200 with a stale Spreo <em>Non-prod environment</em> stub instead of forwarding (checked 1 Sep 2026)

RetroFlow — pros

  • + Genuinely free with no paid tiers, no paywalled features and no account required to join a board
  • + Anonymous feedback — participants contribute with no signup, email or PII collected
  • + Three-step setup — pick a template, share the link, run the retro; participants join in one click and notes sync live
  • + Eleven ready-made formats plus a Custom Board builder (2-6 columns, 7 palettes, 48 emoji) with reusable saved layouts
  • + <strong>Unrestricted voting</strong> — no vote budget, no phase gate, and you can upvote your own cards; cards also drag between columns
  • + PDF and Excel export of the finished board — the only route to getting your data out, and it works

RetroFlow — cons

  • − No timer or phase controls — <em>still</em> nothing in the shipped app, and two timer requests raised in July 2026 sit unshipped as <em>Planned</em> on the vendor's own public roadmap
  • − <strong>Desktop-only</strong> — every board route hard-blocks viewports under 768px with a 'Whoa, tiny screen detected' overlay, even though the marketing FAQ promises a fully responsive phone experience
  • − No grouping of similar cards, no in-column reordering and no carry-over of previous action items; the 'Present' button is still badged SOON
  • − No integrations at all — nothing pushes to Jira, Linear, Slack or Teams, and there is no public API, webhooks or AI
  • − No health checks, recurring retros, mood tracking or cross-team reporting
  • − Solo-developer project with no support team, SLA, SOC 2, SSO or GDPR statement — support routes to a personal WhatsApp number and LinkedIn DMs, and the free-tier backend still shows a ~10s cold start plus a first-load error

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.